Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Aromatherapy in Alleviating Post-Chemotherapy Nausea and Vomiting Among Cancer Patients.

Xin Zhang, Yining Wang, Jingjing He, Hui Li, Yanbin Wang
{"title":"Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Aromatherapy in Alleviating Post-Chemotherapy Nausea and Vomiting Among Cancer Patients.","authors":"Xin Zhang, Yining Wang, Jingjing He, Hui Li, Yanbin Wang","doi":"10.1177/10998004251356515","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background</b>: Chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) represent prevalent and distressing adverse effects among cancer patients, substantially compromising treatment compliance and quality of life. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluate the therapeutic efficacy of aromatherapy in managing CINV, with the objective of informing evidence-based clinical decision-making in supportive cancer care. <b>Methods</b>: We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing aromatherapy's effects on CINV. Two reviewers independently screened studies, extracted data, and evaluated bias risk. Meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.4, with outcomes expressed as odds ratios (ORs) or mean differences (MDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). <b>Results</b>: Twelve RCTs (n = 1,572) were included. Aromatherapy significantly reduced acute nausea (OR = 0.46, 95% CI 0.29-0.73), acute vomiting (OR = 0.56, 95% CI 0.40-0.79), and delayed nausea (OR = 0.64, 95% CI 0.47-0.88). However, no significant effects were observed for delayed vomiting (OR = 0.72, 95% CI 0.39-1.34), VAS scores (MD = -1.30, 95% CI -2.76-0.16), or INVR scores (MD = -1.67, 95% CI -3.67-0.32). No publication bias was detected (<i>p</i> > 0.05). <b>Conclusion</b>: The existing body of evidence suggests that aromatherapy may function as a valuable adjunctive therapy in mitigating chemotherapy-induced nausea, especially during the acute phase. Nevertheless, its efficacy in managing vomiting and symptoms in the delayed phase remains uncertain. Future research efforts should focus on conducting large-scale, methodologically robust RCTs that employ standardized aromatherapy protocols and incorporate longitudinal assessments of outcomes and understanding the biological mechanisms associated with aromatherapy therapeutic effects.</p>","PeriodicalId":93901,"journal":{"name":"Biological research for nursing","volume":" ","pages":"10998004251356515"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biological research for nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10998004251356515","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) represent prevalent and distressing adverse effects among cancer patients, substantially compromising treatment compliance and quality of life. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluate the therapeutic efficacy of aromatherapy in managing CINV, with the objective of informing evidence-based clinical decision-making in supportive cancer care. Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing aromatherapy's effects on CINV. Two reviewers independently screened studies, extracted data, and evaluated bias risk. Meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.4, with outcomes expressed as odds ratios (ORs) or mean differences (MDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results: Twelve RCTs (n = 1,572) were included. Aromatherapy significantly reduced acute nausea (OR = 0.46, 95% CI 0.29-0.73), acute vomiting (OR = 0.56, 95% CI 0.40-0.79), and delayed nausea (OR = 0.64, 95% CI 0.47-0.88). However, no significant effects were observed for delayed vomiting (OR = 0.72, 95% CI 0.39-1.34), VAS scores (MD = -1.30, 95% CI -2.76-0.16), or INVR scores (MD = -1.67, 95% CI -3.67-0.32). No publication bias was detected (p > 0.05). Conclusion: The existing body of evidence suggests that aromatherapy may function as a valuable adjunctive therapy in mitigating chemotherapy-induced nausea, especially during the acute phase. Nevertheless, its efficacy in managing vomiting and symptoms in the delayed phase remains uncertain. Future research efforts should focus on conducting large-scale, methodologically robust RCTs that employ standardized aromatherapy protocols and incorporate longitudinal assessments of outcomes and understanding the biological mechanisms associated with aromatherapy therapeutic effects.

芳香疗法缓解癌症患者化疗后恶心呕吐的系统评价和荟萃分析。
背景:化疗引起的恶心和呕吐(CINV)是癌症患者普遍和痛苦的不良反应,严重影响治疗依从性和生活质量。本系统综述和荟萃分析评估了芳香疗法治疗CINV的疗效,目的是为支持癌症治疗的循证临床决策提供信息。方法:我们系统地检索PubMed、Embase和Cochrane图书馆中评估芳香疗法对CINV影响的随机对照试验(rct)。两位审稿人独立筛选研究、提取数据并评估偏倚风险。使用RevMan 5.4进行meta分析,结果以比值比(ORs)或平均差异(MDs)表示,95%置信区间(ci)。结果:纳入12项rct (n = 1572)。芳香疗法显著减少急性恶心(OR = 0.46, 95% CI 0.29-0.73)、急性呕吐(OR = 0.56, 95% CI 0.40-0.79)和延迟性恶心(OR = 0.64, 95% CI 0.47-0.88)。然而,未观察到延迟呕吐(OR = 0.72, 95% CI 0.39-1.34)、VAS评分(MD = -1.30, 95% CI -2.76-0.16)或INVR评分(MD = -1.67, 95% CI -3.67-0.32)的显著影响。未发现发表偏倚(p < 0.05)。结论:现有的大量证据表明,芳香疗法可能是一种有价值的辅助疗法,可以减轻化疗引起的恶心,特别是在急性期。然而,其治疗延迟期呕吐和症状的效果仍不确定。未来的研究工作应侧重于进行大规模的、方法学上可靠的随机对照试验,这些随机对照试验采用标准化的芳香疗法方案,并纳入对结果的纵向评估,并了解芳香疗法治疗效果相关的生物学机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信