Knowledge and reporting of adverse events following childhood immunization (AEFI) among health workers and caregivers at Mengo Hospital (2021), Kampala, Uganda: A mixed-methods study.

PLOS global public health Pub Date : 2025-07-08 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1371/journal.pgph.0004827
Benjamin Watyaba, Lucy Chimoyi, Ivana Knezevic, Oliver Ombeva Malande, Hamza Kalutte, Henry Bazira, Faith Kewaza, Florence Adong, Oliver Nankonyoli, Bernard Kikaire
{"title":"Knowledge and reporting of adverse events following childhood immunization (AEFI) among health workers and caregivers at Mengo Hospital (2021), Kampala, Uganda: A mixed-methods study.","authors":"Benjamin Watyaba, Lucy Chimoyi, Ivana Knezevic, Oliver Ombeva Malande, Hamza Kalutte, Henry Bazira, Faith Kewaza, Florence Adong, Oliver Nankonyoli, Bernard Kikaire","doi":"10.1371/journal.pgph.0004827","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Vaccines used in National Immunization Programmes (NIPs) are known to be safe and effective if used correctly, however, no vaccine is completely risk-free as adverse events occasionally occur after immunization. The World Health Organization (WHO) recommends adverse event following immunization (AEFI) surveillance for all vaccines as a critical tool to monitor safety and address potential concerns. However, the factors contributing to Uganda's inability to meet global vaccine safety indicators remain unclear. This study assessed the level of knowledge and reporting of AEFI of children among healthcare workers and caregivers at Mengo Hospital, Kampala. A cross-sectional mixed-methods study involving three focus group discussions, each consisting of five caregivers, eight key informant interviews with healthcare workers (HCWs) and 388 face-to-face interviews with caregivers was carried out. Caregivers accompanying their children for their routine vaccination visits were invited to participate in the study. We descriptively summarized data using measures of central tendency, dispersion, and frequencies. Crude and adjusted measures of association between predictors and AEFI reporting were assessed using Pearson's Chi-square test, and binary logistic regression analysis respectively. Thematic analysis was used to identify behavioral, personal, and social patterns influencing knowledge and reporting of adverse events following immunization among caregivers and HCWs. Approximately one-third of caregivers (130, 33.5%) reported that their children experienced an AEFI and reported it to a healthcare facility. Significant predictors of AEFI reporting included having a secondary education (aOR = 3.56, 95% CI: 1.12-11.30), tertiary education or higher (aOR = 8.52, 95% CI: 2.09-34.81), being older than 35 years (aOR= 18.77; 95% CI: 2.34-150.60) and unmarried (aOR = 3.27, 95% CI: 1.51-7.12). While most HCWs had good AEFI knowledge, they lacked awareness of the national reporting system. Strengthening training for HCWs and raising awareness among caregivers is essential to improve AEFI surveillance.</p>","PeriodicalId":74466,"journal":{"name":"PLOS global public health","volume":"5 7","pages":"e0004827"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12237010/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PLOS global public health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgph.0004827","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Vaccines used in National Immunization Programmes (NIPs) are known to be safe and effective if used correctly, however, no vaccine is completely risk-free as adverse events occasionally occur after immunization. The World Health Organization (WHO) recommends adverse event following immunization (AEFI) surveillance for all vaccines as a critical tool to monitor safety and address potential concerns. However, the factors contributing to Uganda's inability to meet global vaccine safety indicators remain unclear. This study assessed the level of knowledge and reporting of AEFI of children among healthcare workers and caregivers at Mengo Hospital, Kampala. A cross-sectional mixed-methods study involving three focus group discussions, each consisting of five caregivers, eight key informant interviews with healthcare workers (HCWs) and 388 face-to-face interviews with caregivers was carried out. Caregivers accompanying their children for their routine vaccination visits were invited to participate in the study. We descriptively summarized data using measures of central tendency, dispersion, and frequencies. Crude and adjusted measures of association between predictors and AEFI reporting were assessed using Pearson's Chi-square test, and binary logistic regression analysis respectively. Thematic analysis was used to identify behavioral, personal, and social patterns influencing knowledge and reporting of adverse events following immunization among caregivers and HCWs. Approximately one-third of caregivers (130, 33.5%) reported that their children experienced an AEFI and reported it to a healthcare facility. Significant predictors of AEFI reporting included having a secondary education (aOR = 3.56, 95% CI: 1.12-11.30), tertiary education or higher (aOR = 8.52, 95% CI: 2.09-34.81), being older than 35 years (aOR= 18.77; 95% CI: 2.34-150.60) and unmarried (aOR = 3.27, 95% CI: 1.51-7.12). While most HCWs had good AEFI knowledge, they lacked awareness of the national reporting system. Strengthening training for HCWs and raising awareness among caregivers is essential to improve AEFI surveillance.

乌干达坎帕拉蒙戈医院卫生工作者和护理人员儿童免疫不良事件(AEFI)的知识和报告(2021年):一项混合方法研究。
众所周知,国家免疫规划中使用的疫苗如果使用正确,是安全有效的,然而,没有一种疫苗是完全没有风险的,因为免疫接种后偶尔会发生不良事件。世界卫生组织(世卫组织)建议对所有疫苗进行免疫后不良事件(AEFI)监测,作为监测安全性和解决潜在问题的重要工具。然而,导致乌干达无法达到全球疫苗安全指标的因素仍不清楚。本研究评估了坎帕拉蒙戈医院医护人员和护理人员对儿童急性脑损伤的知识水平和报告情况。一项横断面混合方法研究包括三个焦点小组讨论,每个小组由5名护理人员组成,8个与卫生保健工作者(HCWs)的关键信息提供者访谈和388个与护理人员的面对面访谈。陪同孩子进行常规疫苗接种的护理人员被邀请参加这项研究。我们使用集中趋势、分散和频率的测量方法描述性地总结了数据。预测因子与AEFI报告之间的相关性分别采用Pearson卡方检验和二元logistic回归分析进行评估。主题分析用于确定影响护理人员和卫生保健工作者免疫接种后不良事件的知识和报告的行为、个人和社会模式。大约三分之一的护理人员(130,33.5%)报告说,他们的孩子经历了急性脑损伤,并向医疗机构报告。AEFI报告的显著预测因子包括中等教育程度(aOR= 3.56, 95% CI: 1.12-11.30)、高等教育或更高学历(aOR= 8.52, 95% CI: 2.09-34.81)、年龄大于35岁(aOR= 18.77;95% CI: 2.34-150.60)和未婚(aOR = 3.27, 95% CI: 1.51-7.12)。虽然大多数卫生保健工作者具有良好的AEFI知识,但他们缺乏对国家报告系统的认识。加强对卫生保健工作者的培训和提高护理人员的认识对于改善急性脑损伤监测至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信