Application of Psychoeducation-Based Model Group Work in Continuous Treatment of Patients With Bipolar Disorder in Remission.

IF 3.5 Q3 PSYCHIATRY
Alpha psychiatry Pub Date : 2025-06-18 eCollection Date: 2025-06-01 DOI:10.31083/AP43989
Xuemin Shi, Suilin Jia, Lingkai Yang, Zhipeng Yin, Bowen Yin, Guangdong Chen
{"title":"Application of Psychoeducation-Based Model Group Work in Continuous Treatment of Patients With Bipolar Disorder in Remission.","authors":"Xuemin Shi, Suilin Jia, Lingkai Yang, Zhipeng Yin, Bowen Yin, Guangdong Chen","doi":"10.31083/AP43989","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To explore the value of psychoeducation-based group work in the continuous treatment of patients with bipolar disorder in remission.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From December 2020 to March 2022, 60 outpatients with remission-stage bipolar disorder were enrolled in the trial. All enrolled subjects were randomly and single-blindly divided into a study group and a control group at a 1:1 ratio. The control group was treated with general drug therapy, while the study group was treated with group psychological education combined with drug therapy. To analyze the treatment adherence of patients in the two groups, and to compare the changes in self-awareness and attitude toward treatment questionnaire (ITAQ) scale scores, Morisky medication adherence scale scores, Self-rating Depression Scale (SDS) total scores, and subscale scores before and after the intervention in the two groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean score for treatment compliance in the study group was 4.2 ± 0.3, which was significantly higher than that in the control group (4.2 ± 0.3 <i>vs</i>. 3.2 ± 0.5, <i>p</i> < 0.001). The ITAQ score in the study group following the intervention was significantly higher than that in the control group (18.5 ± 3.2 <i>vs</i>. 12.7 ± 2.7, <i>p</i> < 0.001), as well as the study group prior to the intervention (<i>p</i> < 0.001). Morisky scale scores after intervention were significantly higher than those in the control group (6.9 ± 1.0 <i>vs</i>. 5.5 ± 0.8, <i>p</i> < 0.001) and the study group before intervention (<i>p</i> < 0.001). Sheehan Disability Scale 1 (SDS1), SDS2, SDS3, and SDS scores after intervention were 8.5 ± 1.2, 8.0 ± 1.5, 7.9 ± 2.0, and 25.5 ± 4.3, respectively, all of which were significantly higher than those in the control group (all <i>p</i> < 0.001). The proportion of positive coping style for bipolar disorder in the study group was significantly higher than that in the control group (93.3% <i>vs</i>. 50.0%, <i>p</i> = 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Continuous intervention using psychoeducation-based model group work in patients with bipolar disorder in the remission stage can significantly improve treatment compliance, improve insight and treatment attitudes, ensure compliance with drug therapy, and reduce the degree of mental disability.</p>","PeriodicalId":72151,"journal":{"name":"Alpha psychiatry","volume":"26 3","pages":"43989"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12231409/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Alpha psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31083/AP43989","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To explore the value of psychoeducation-based group work in the continuous treatment of patients with bipolar disorder in remission.

Methods: From December 2020 to March 2022, 60 outpatients with remission-stage bipolar disorder were enrolled in the trial. All enrolled subjects were randomly and single-blindly divided into a study group and a control group at a 1:1 ratio. The control group was treated with general drug therapy, while the study group was treated with group psychological education combined with drug therapy. To analyze the treatment adherence of patients in the two groups, and to compare the changes in self-awareness and attitude toward treatment questionnaire (ITAQ) scale scores, Morisky medication adherence scale scores, Self-rating Depression Scale (SDS) total scores, and subscale scores before and after the intervention in the two groups.

Results: The mean score for treatment compliance in the study group was 4.2 ± 0.3, which was significantly higher than that in the control group (4.2 ± 0.3 vs. 3.2 ± 0.5, p < 0.001). The ITAQ score in the study group following the intervention was significantly higher than that in the control group (18.5 ± 3.2 vs. 12.7 ± 2.7, p < 0.001), as well as the study group prior to the intervention (p < 0.001). Morisky scale scores after intervention were significantly higher than those in the control group (6.9 ± 1.0 vs. 5.5 ± 0.8, p < 0.001) and the study group before intervention (p < 0.001). Sheehan Disability Scale 1 (SDS1), SDS2, SDS3, and SDS scores after intervention were 8.5 ± 1.2, 8.0 ± 1.5, 7.9 ± 2.0, and 25.5 ± 4.3, respectively, all of which were significantly higher than those in the control group (all p < 0.001). The proportion of positive coping style for bipolar disorder in the study group was significantly higher than that in the control group (93.3% vs. 50.0%, p = 0.001).

Conclusion: Continuous intervention using psychoeducation-based model group work in patients with bipolar disorder in the remission stage can significantly improve treatment compliance, improve insight and treatment attitudes, ensure compliance with drug therapy, and reduce the degree of mental disability.

基于心理教育的模式小组工作在双相情感障碍缓解期患者持续治疗中的应用。
目的:探讨以心理教育为基础的小组工作在双相情感障碍缓解期患者持续治疗中的价值。方法:从2020年12月到2022年3月,60名缓解期双相情感障碍门诊患者入组试验。所有入组的受试者按1:1的比例随机单盲分为研究组和对照组。对照组采用一般药物治疗,研究组采用团体心理教育结合药物治疗。分析两组患者的治疗依从性,比较干预前后两组患者对治疗问卷(ITAQ)量表得分、Morisky药物依从性量表得分、抑郁自评量表(SDS)总分和亚量表得分的自我意识和态度变化。结果:研究组治疗依从性平均评分为4.2±0.3分,显著高于对照组(4.2±0.3比3.2±0.5,p < 0.001)。干预后研究组ITAQ评分显著高于对照组(18.5±3.2比12.7±2.7,p < 0.001),也高于干预前研究组(p < 0.001)。干预后Morisky量表得分显著高于对照组(6.9±1.0比5.5±0.8,p < 0.001)和干预前研究组(p < 0.001)。干预后Sheehan残疾量表1 (SDS1)、SDS2、SDS3、SDS评分分别为8.5±1.2、8.0±1.5、7.9±2.0、25.5±4.3,均显著高于对照组(p均< 0.001)。研究组双相情感障碍患者积极应对方式的比例显著高于对照组(93.3%比50.0%,p = 0.001)。结论:以心理教育为基础的模式小组工作对缓解期双相情感障碍患者进行持续干预,可显著提高治疗依从性,改善洞察力和治疗态度,保证药物治疗的依从性,降低精神残疾程度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信