Modifiable risk factors for sleep apnea: evidence from meta-analysis of traditional observational studies and two-sample Mendelian randomization.

IF 3.8 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Jia Wen Xu, Hui Jun Yue, Yu Zhang Huang, Hao Wu, Hui Min Su, Mei Jiao Li, Xue Qing Deng, Jing Hong Liang, Adrian I Campos, Miguel E Rentería, Lin Yang, Lin Xu, Jiao Wang
{"title":"Modifiable risk factors for sleep apnea: evidence from meta-analysis of traditional observational studies and two-sample Mendelian randomization.","authors":"Jia Wen Xu, Hui Jun Yue, Yu Zhang Huang, Hao Wu, Hui Min Su, Mei Jiao Li, Xue Qing Deng, Jing Hong Liang, Adrian I Campos, Miguel E Rentería, Lin Yang, Lin Xu, Jiao Wang","doi":"10.1093/epirev/mxaf010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Epidemiological studies have linked several modifiable factors to the risk of sleep apnea (SA). However, which specific factors affect the risk of SA and the strength of these effects are unclear. First, we conducted meta-analyses based on cross-sectional, cohort, and case-control studies published in PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science, up to 1 Aug 2023. Studies that reported one of the associations of education level, physical activity, sedentary behavior, smoking status, alcohol consumption, and coffee consumption with SA were included. Two independent investigators assessed the risk of bias using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) and the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) Scale. The study protocol was prospectively registered with PROSPERO, CRD42022319988. Then, we performed two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) studies to clarify the causality further. A total of 49 studies were included in the meta-analysis (total N =429,809). Compared with the other categorial groups, lower level of education (odds ratio (OR) 1.58, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.28-1.96), higher level of sedentary behavior (1.22, 1.01-1.47), current smoking status (1.33, 1.17-1.51), current alcohol consumption (1.40, 1.33-1.48) were associated with higher risk of SA, and higher level of physical activity (0.77, 0.70-0.83) were associated with lower risk of SA. In the MR study, we found that years of educational attainment were associated with a lower risk of SA (0.83, 0.78-0.88), and that smoking initiation was associated with a higher risk of SA (1.10, 1.05-1.15). Prevention strategies of SA should focus on modifying these risk factors, especially reducing education inequalities and smoking initiation.</p>","PeriodicalId":50510,"journal":{"name":"Epidemiologic Reviews","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Epidemiologic Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/epirev/mxaf010","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Epidemiological studies have linked several modifiable factors to the risk of sleep apnea (SA). However, which specific factors affect the risk of SA and the strength of these effects are unclear. First, we conducted meta-analyses based on cross-sectional, cohort, and case-control studies published in PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science, up to 1 Aug 2023. Studies that reported one of the associations of education level, physical activity, sedentary behavior, smoking status, alcohol consumption, and coffee consumption with SA were included. Two independent investigators assessed the risk of bias using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) and the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) Scale. The study protocol was prospectively registered with PROSPERO, CRD42022319988. Then, we performed two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) studies to clarify the causality further. A total of 49 studies were included in the meta-analysis (total N =429,809). Compared with the other categorial groups, lower level of education (odds ratio (OR) 1.58, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.28-1.96), higher level of sedentary behavior (1.22, 1.01-1.47), current smoking status (1.33, 1.17-1.51), current alcohol consumption (1.40, 1.33-1.48) were associated with higher risk of SA, and higher level of physical activity (0.77, 0.70-0.83) were associated with lower risk of SA. In the MR study, we found that years of educational attainment were associated with a lower risk of SA (0.83, 0.78-0.88), and that smoking initiation was associated with a higher risk of SA (1.10, 1.05-1.15). Prevention strategies of SA should focus on modifying these risk factors, especially reducing education inequalities and smoking initiation.

睡眠呼吸暂停可改变的危险因素:来自传统观察性研究和双样本孟德尔随机化荟萃分析的证据。
流行病学研究已经将几个可改变的因素与睡眠呼吸暂停(SA)的风险联系起来。然而,哪些具体因素会影响SA的风险以及这些影响的强度尚不清楚。首先,我们对截至2023年8月1日发表在PubMed、Scopus和Web of Science上的横断面、队列和病例对照研究进行了荟萃分析。研究报告了教育水平、体育活动、久坐行为、吸烟状况、饮酒和咖啡消费与SA的关联。两名独立调查人员使用纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表(NOS)和卫生保健研究与质量机构(AHRQ)量表评估偏倚风险。研究方案已在PROSPERO进行前瞻性注册,编号为CRD42022319988。然后,我们进行了双样本孟德尔随机化(MR)研究,以进一步阐明因果关系。meta分析共纳入49项研究(总N =429,809)。与其他类别组相比,较低的教育水平(优势比(OR) 1.58, 95%可信区间(CI) 1.28-1.96)、较高水平的久坐行为(1.22,1.01-1.47)、当前吸烟状况(1.33,1.17-1.51)、当前饮酒状况(1.40,1.33-1.48)与SA风险较高相关,较高水平的体育活动(0.77,0.70-0.83)与SA风险较低相关。在MR研究中,我们发现受教育年限与SA风险较低相关(0.83,0.78-0.88),而开始吸烟与SA风险较高相关(1.10,1.05-1.15)。SA的预防策略应侧重于改变这些危险因素,特别是减少教育不平等和吸烟开始。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Epidemiologic Reviews
Epidemiologic Reviews 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
8.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
期刊介绍: Epidemiologic Reviews is a leading review journal in public health. Published once a year, issues collect review articles on a particular subject. Recent issues have focused on The Obesity Epidemic, Epidemiologic Research on Health Disparities, and Epidemiologic Approaches to Global Health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信