The impact of video-based training on football referees' decision-making skills: a systematic review and meta analysis.

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION
Rui Zhou, Xiaocen Hao, Pei Deng, Danyang Li, Yingzhe Song, Yeqin Zhang
{"title":"The impact of video-based training on football referees' decision-making skills: a systematic review and meta analysis.","authors":"Rui Zhou, Xiaocen Hao, Pei Deng, Danyang Li, Yingzhe Song, Yeqin Zhang","doi":"10.1186/s13102-024-01046-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Video-based decision-making training is considered a promising intervention to enhance the decision-making skills of football referees. This study conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to validate the effectiveness of video-based training and evaluate its overall impact on improving referees' decision-making skills, providing a scientific basis for the optimization and innovation of referee training methods.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A systematic search was performed across four electronic databases (EBSCO, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science). Inclusion and exclusion criteria were defined using the PICOS framework. Relevant literature was independently screened, and key information was extracted. The revised Cochrane risk-of-bias tool (RoB 2) was employed to assess the risk of bias in the included studies, and statistical analyses were conducted using CMA 3.0 software.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>Six randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving a total of 163 participants were included. The meta-analysis revealed that video-based training significantly improved referees' decision-making skills (Hedges' s g = 1.718, 95% CI [1.058, 2.377], P < 0.001, τ<sup>2</sup> = 0.464). The overall risk of bias across the included studies was assessed as low to moderate, indicating a generally reliable methodological quality. Sensitivity analysis confirmed the robustness of the overall effect size.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This meta-analysis demonstrates that video-based decision-making training is an effective and practical intervention for significantly enhancing the decision-making skills of football referees. Its convenience and cost-effectiveness make it an essential supplementary training tool for referees. However, the findings are limited by factors such as the small sample size of included studies, incomplete descriptions of participant characteristics, and insufficient gender representation. Future high-quality research is needed to comprehensively evaluate the effectiveness of video-based training across referees of different levels and genders.</p>","PeriodicalId":48585,"journal":{"name":"BMC Sports Science Medicine and Rehabilitation","volume":"17 1","pages":"186"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12239248/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Sports Science Medicine and Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13102-024-01046-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Video-based decision-making training is considered a promising intervention to enhance the decision-making skills of football referees. This study conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to validate the effectiveness of video-based training and evaluate its overall impact on improving referees' decision-making skills, providing a scientific basis for the optimization and innovation of referee training methods.

Method: A systematic search was performed across four electronic databases (EBSCO, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science). Inclusion and exclusion criteria were defined using the PICOS framework. Relevant literature was independently screened, and key information was extracted. The revised Cochrane risk-of-bias tool (RoB 2) was employed to assess the risk of bias in the included studies, and statistical analyses were conducted using CMA 3.0 software.

Result: Six randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving a total of 163 participants were included. The meta-analysis revealed that video-based training significantly improved referees' decision-making skills (Hedges' s g = 1.718, 95% CI [1.058, 2.377], P < 0.001, τ2 = 0.464). The overall risk of bias across the included studies was assessed as low to moderate, indicating a generally reliable methodological quality. Sensitivity analysis confirmed the robustness of the overall effect size.

Conclusion: This meta-analysis demonstrates that video-based decision-making training is an effective and practical intervention for significantly enhancing the decision-making skills of football referees. Its convenience and cost-effectiveness make it an essential supplementary training tool for referees. However, the findings are limited by factors such as the small sample size of included studies, incomplete descriptions of participant characteristics, and insufficient gender representation. Future high-quality research is needed to comprehensively evaluate the effectiveness of video-based training across referees of different levels and genders.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

视频训练对足球裁判决策能力的影响:系统回顾和meta分析。
目的:基于视频的决策训练被认为是一种很有前途的干预手段,可以提高足球裁判的决策技能。本研究通过系统回顾和meta分析,验证视频训练的有效性,评估视频训练对裁判员决策能力提高的整体影响,为裁判员训练方法的优化和创新提供科学依据。方法:系统检索四个电子数据库(EBSCO、PubMed、Scopus和Web of Science)。采用PICOS框架确定纳入和排除标准。独立筛选相关文献,提取关键信息。采用修订后的Cochrane风险偏倚工具(RoB 2)评估纳入研究的偏倚风险,采用CMA 3.0软件进行统计分析。结果:纳入6项随机对照试验(RCTs),共163名受试者。meta分析显示,基于视频的训练显著提高了裁判的决策技能(Hedges’s g = 1.718, 95% CI [1.058, 2.377], P 2 = 0.464)。纳入研究的总体偏倚风险评估为低至中等,表明方法学质量总体可靠。敏感性分析证实了总体效应大小的稳健性。结论:本meta分析表明基于视频的决策训练是一种有效且实用的干预手段,可以显著提高足球裁判的决策技能。它的便利性和成本效益使它成为裁判员必不可少的补充训练工具。然而,研究结果受到一些因素的限制,如纳入研究的样本量小,对参与者特征的描述不完整,以及性别代表性不足。未来需要进行高质量的研究,以全面评估不同水平和性别裁判的视频培训效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Sports Science Medicine and Rehabilitation
BMC Sports Science Medicine and Rehabilitation Medicine-Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
5.30%
发文量
196
审稿时长
26 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Sports Science, Medicine and Rehabilitation is an open access, peer reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of sports medicine and the exercise sciences, including rehabilitation, traumatology, cardiology, physiology, and nutrition.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信