Examining the Burden of Chronic Disease and Low SES to Identify High-Need Rural Counties.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Gabriel A Benavidez, Emma Boswell, Peiyin Hung, Elizabeth Crouch
{"title":"Examining the Burden of Chronic Disease and Low SES to Identify High-Need Rural Counties.","authors":"Gabriel A Benavidez, Emma Boswell, Peiyin Hung, Elizabeth Crouch","doi":"10.1097/PHH.0000000000002181","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aims to identify rural counties across the United States that experience combined high prevalence of chronic diseases and low socioeconomic status (SES), categorizing them as high-need areas. We analyze the geographic and sociodemographic profiles of these counties and examine differences in access to care for high-need rural counties.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used the 2023 PLACES dataset from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention for chronic disease prevalence estimates and the 2020 American Community Survey for SES indicators. Counties were classified into tertiles based on disease prevalence and SES indicators, creating an overall composite score identifying counties as low, moderate, or high need. We used ArcGIS Pro to map the distribution of high-need counties across the United States with statistical analyses of geographic distribution and health care access conducted through quantile regression and spatial autocorrelation methods.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>A total of 1934 rural counties, representing nearly 99% of rural counties, were included in this analysis, identifying 534 high-need counties, primarily in the southeastern United States. These counties had significantly higher proportions of non-Hispanic Black residents. Significant spatial autocorrelation indicated that counties with similar levels of chronic disease and SES are geographically clustered. High-need counties faced greater distances to health care facilities compared to their lower-need counterparts, highlighting substantial barriers to accessing care.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This analysis identified geographic variation in chronic disease burden and socioeconomic status across rural US counties, with high-need areas concentrated in the Southeast. The findings demonstrate the value of a simple, replicable framework for identifying rural counties facing overlapping health and socioeconomic challenges. This approach can support efforts to prioritize resource allocation and guide future research and policy aimed at improving access and outcomes in underserved rural communities.</p>","PeriodicalId":47855,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Public Health Management and Practice","volume":" ","pages":"691-699"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Public Health Management and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PHH.0000000000002181","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This study aims to identify rural counties across the United States that experience combined high prevalence of chronic diseases and low socioeconomic status (SES), categorizing them as high-need areas. We analyze the geographic and sociodemographic profiles of these counties and examine differences in access to care for high-need rural counties.

Methods: We used the 2023 PLACES dataset from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention for chronic disease prevalence estimates and the 2020 American Community Survey for SES indicators. Counties were classified into tertiles based on disease prevalence and SES indicators, creating an overall composite score identifying counties as low, moderate, or high need. We used ArcGIS Pro to map the distribution of high-need counties across the United States with statistical analyses of geographic distribution and health care access conducted through quantile regression and spatial autocorrelation methods.

Findings: A total of 1934 rural counties, representing nearly 99% of rural counties, were included in this analysis, identifying 534 high-need counties, primarily in the southeastern United States. These counties had significantly higher proportions of non-Hispanic Black residents. Significant spatial autocorrelation indicated that counties with similar levels of chronic disease and SES are geographically clustered. High-need counties faced greater distances to health care facilities compared to their lower-need counterparts, highlighting substantial barriers to accessing care.

Conclusion: This analysis identified geographic variation in chronic disease burden and socioeconomic status across rural US counties, with high-need areas concentrated in the Southeast. The findings demonstrate the value of a simple, replicable framework for identifying rural counties facing overlapping health and socioeconomic challenges. This approach can support efforts to prioritize resource allocation and guide future research and policy aimed at improving access and outcomes in underserved rural communities.

检查慢性病负担和低社会经济地位以确定高需求的农村县。
目的:本研究旨在确定美国各地慢性疾病高患病率和低社会经济地位(SES)并存的农村县,并将其归类为高需求地区。我们分析了这些县的地理和社会人口特征,并检查了高需求农村县在获得护理方面的差异。方法:我们使用来自疾病控制和预防中心的2023年PLACES数据集进行慢性病患病率估算,并使用2020年美国社区调查的SES指标。根据疾病流行率和社会经济状况指标,将县划分为几个等级,形成一个综合评分,将县划分为低、中、高需求。利用ArcGIS Pro软件,通过分位数回归和空间自相关方法对地理分布和卫生保健可及性进行统计分析,绘制了美国各地高需求县的分布图。研究结果:共有1934个农村县,占农村县的近99%,被纳入该分析,确定了534个高需求县,主要在美国东南部。这些县的非西班牙裔黑人居民比例明显更高。显著的空间自相关表明,慢性病和SES水平相似的县在地理上呈聚集性。与需求较低的县相比,需求高的县到医疗机构的距离更远,这突出了获得医疗服务的重大障碍。结论:该分析确定了美国农村各县慢性疾病负担和社会经济地位的地理差异,高需求地区集中在东南部。研究结果表明,一个简单、可复制的框架对于确定面临卫生和社会经济双重挑战的农村县具有重要价值。这种方法可以支持优先分配资源的努力,并指导未来的研究和政策,旨在改善服务不足的农村社区的获取和成果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Public Health Management and Practice
Journal of Public Health Management and Practice PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
9.10%
发文量
287
期刊介绍: Journal of Public Health Management and Practice publishes articles which focus on evidence based public health practice and research. The journal is a bi-monthly peer-reviewed publication guided by a multidisciplinary editorial board of administrators, practitioners and scientists. Journal of Public Health Management and Practice publishes in a wide range of population health topics including research to practice; emergency preparedness; bioterrorism; infectious disease surveillance; environmental health; community health assessment, chronic disease prevention and health promotion, and academic-practice linkages.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信