Cross-specialty impact in the adoption of minimally invasive surgery in abdominal surgical oncology at the hospital level.

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Anne Pannekoek, Alexander Melamed, Jose Alejandro Rauh-Hain, Mengyuan Ruan, Stuart R Lipsitz, Li Siguo, George Molina
{"title":"Cross-specialty impact in the adoption of minimally invasive surgery in abdominal surgical oncology at the hospital level.","authors":"Anne Pannekoek, Alexander Melamed, Jose Alejandro Rauh-Hain, Mengyuan Ruan, Stuart R Lipsitz, Li Siguo, George Molina","doi":"10.1007/s11701-025-02549-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Colorectal surgeons have been early adopters of MIS. The objective of this study was to evaluate whether use of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) for colorectal cancers (CRC) has had an impact on use of MIS for hepatic, pancreatic, biliary, and gastric cancer (HPB/gastric) at the hospital level. We hypothesized that there is cross-specialty, hospital-level impact between colorectal and HPB/gastric surgeons in their use of MIS. Using the 2010-2019 National Cancer Database, we identified patients with histologically confirmed cancers who underwent curative-intent surgery. The hospital-level use of MIS for CRC and HPB/gastric cancers was standardized by adjusting hospital and patient covariates. Using these adjusted MIS rates as covariates, the yearly-level odds of receiving MIS for HPB/gastric cancers were estimated using logistic regression models. 87,241 and 134,019 patients (median age 65 years) with HPB/gastric cancers and CRC, respectively, were included. The proportion of hospitals performing more than 50% of their cases via MIS for both groups of cancers increased from 1% in 2010 to 27% in 2019. The proportion of hospitals performing more than 10% of their cases via a robotic approach increased from 1 to 33%. The odds of receiving MIS among patients with HPB/gastric cancers were more strongly associated with the level of MIS use for HPB/gastric cancer in the previous year than with MIS use for CRC. Adoption of MIS for HPB/gastric cancers appears to be influenced to a greater degree by intra-specialty factors rather than by cross-specialty use of MIS for CRC.</p>","PeriodicalId":47616,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Robotic Surgery","volume":"19 1","pages":"366"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Robotic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-025-02549-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Colorectal surgeons have been early adopters of MIS. The objective of this study was to evaluate whether use of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) for colorectal cancers (CRC) has had an impact on use of MIS for hepatic, pancreatic, biliary, and gastric cancer (HPB/gastric) at the hospital level. We hypothesized that there is cross-specialty, hospital-level impact between colorectal and HPB/gastric surgeons in their use of MIS. Using the 2010-2019 National Cancer Database, we identified patients with histologically confirmed cancers who underwent curative-intent surgery. The hospital-level use of MIS for CRC and HPB/gastric cancers was standardized by adjusting hospital and patient covariates. Using these adjusted MIS rates as covariates, the yearly-level odds of receiving MIS for HPB/gastric cancers were estimated using logistic regression models. 87,241 and 134,019 patients (median age 65 years) with HPB/gastric cancers and CRC, respectively, were included. The proportion of hospitals performing more than 50% of their cases via MIS for both groups of cancers increased from 1% in 2010 to 27% in 2019. The proportion of hospitals performing more than 10% of their cases via a robotic approach increased from 1 to 33%. The odds of receiving MIS among patients with HPB/gastric cancers were more strongly associated with the level of MIS use for HPB/gastric cancer in the previous year than with MIS use for CRC. Adoption of MIS for HPB/gastric cancers appears to be influenced to a greater degree by intra-specialty factors rather than by cross-specialty use of MIS for CRC.

微创手术在腹部外科肿瘤医院采用的跨专科影响
结肠直肠外科医生是MIS的早期采用者。本研究的目的是评估微创手术(MIS)在结直肠癌(CRC)中的应用是否会影响微创手术在肝脏、胰腺、胆道和胃癌(HPB/胃癌)中的应用。我们假设结直肠和HPB/胃外科医生在使用MIS方面存在跨专业、医院水平的影响。使用2010-2019年国家癌症数据库,我们确定了组织学证实的接受治疗目的手术的癌症患者。通过调整医院和患者协变量,标准化了医院层面对结直肠癌和HPB/胃癌的MIS使用。使用这些调整后的MIS率作为协变量,使用logistic回归模型估计HPB/胃癌患者接受MIS的年水平几率。分别纳入了87,241例和134,019例HPB/胃癌和CRC患者(中位年龄65岁)。通过管理信息系统处理两类癌症病例的比例超过50%的医院比例从2010年的1%增加到2019年的27%。通过机器人方法处理超过10%病例的医院比例从1%增加到33%。HPB/胃癌患者接受MIS的几率与前一年HPB/胃癌患者使用MIS的水平相关,而与结肠直肠癌患者使用MIS相关。采用MIS治疗HPB/胃癌似乎更大程度上受到专业内因素的影响,而不是跨专业使用MIS治疗CRC。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
8.70%
发文量
145
期刊介绍: The aim of the Journal of Robotic Surgery is to become the leading worldwide journal for publication of articles related to robotic surgery, encompassing surgical simulation and integrated imaging techniques. The journal provides a centralized, focused resource for physicians wishing to publish their experience or those wishing to avail themselves of the most up-to-date findings.The journal reports on advance in a wide range of surgical specialties including adult and pediatric urology, general surgery, cardiac surgery, gynecology, ENT, orthopedics and neurosurgery.The use of robotics in surgery is broad-based and will undoubtedly expand over the next decade as new technical innovations and techniques increase the applicability of its use. The journal intends to capture this trend as it develops.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信