Barriers to providing low-intensity cognitive behavioural therapy to individuals with schizophrenia by home-visiting nurses in Japan: a qualitative descriptive study of nurses' experiences.

IF 2 Q2 NURSING
Journal of Research in Nursing Pub Date : 2025-07-02 eCollection Date: 2025-06-01 DOI:10.1177/17449871251333288
Yuki Taga-Shikuri, Hiroki Tanoue, Yoshifumi Kido, Naoki Yoshinaga
{"title":"Barriers to providing low-intensity cognitive behavioural therapy to individuals with schizophrenia by home-visiting nurses in Japan: a qualitative descriptive study of nurses' experiences.","authors":"Yuki Taga-Shikuri, Hiroki Tanoue, Yoshifumi Kido, Naoki Yoshinaga","doi":"10.1177/17449871251333288","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) is recommended for managing individuals with schizophrenia, it has been underutilised in clinical practice. Low-intensity CBT (fewer sessions provided by non-specialists) is expected to offer a partial solution; however, its implementation within community-based care settings remains limited.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>To explore the difficulties and barriers faced by home-visiting nurses when providing low-intensity CBT to individuals with schizophrenia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A qualitative descriptive study was conducted through semi-structured interviews with six nurses in Japan who had experience in delivering low-intensity CBT, including CBTs for psychosis (CBt-p) and individualised metacognitive training for psychosis (MCT+). Data were analysed using a qualitative descriptive method.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three main categories of difficulties/barriers were identified: 'Difficulties in learning low-intensity CBT', 'Difficulties in applying low-intensity CBT to individual clients' and 'Difficulties in providing low-intensity CBT due to the unique structures and functions of home-visiting nursing'.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The findings suggest the need for refining the implementation manuals with simplified terminology and familiar examples; creating a work environment that allows continuous consultation with supervisors and mutual learning; revising reimbursement systems under the national health insurance scheme to allow for longer visit times; and training non-specialist nurses as co-therapists to ensure the continuity of care.</p>","PeriodicalId":47172,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Research in Nursing","volume":"30 4","pages":"326-340"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12231956/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Research in Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17449871251333288","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Although cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) is recommended for managing individuals with schizophrenia, it has been underutilised in clinical practice. Low-intensity CBT (fewer sessions provided by non-specialists) is expected to offer a partial solution; however, its implementation within community-based care settings remains limited.

Aims: To explore the difficulties and barriers faced by home-visiting nurses when providing low-intensity CBT to individuals with schizophrenia.

Methods: A qualitative descriptive study was conducted through semi-structured interviews with six nurses in Japan who had experience in delivering low-intensity CBT, including CBTs for psychosis (CBt-p) and individualised metacognitive training for psychosis (MCT+). Data were analysed using a qualitative descriptive method.

Results: Three main categories of difficulties/barriers were identified: 'Difficulties in learning low-intensity CBT', 'Difficulties in applying low-intensity CBT to individual clients' and 'Difficulties in providing low-intensity CBT due to the unique structures and functions of home-visiting nursing'.

Conclusions: The findings suggest the need for refining the implementation manuals with simplified terminology and familiar examples; creating a work environment that allows continuous consultation with supervisors and mutual learning; revising reimbursement systems under the national health insurance scheme to allow for longer visit times; and training non-specialist nurses as co-therapists to ensure the continuity of care.

日本家访护士为精神分裂症患者提供低强度认知行为治疗的障碍:一项对护士经验的定性描述性研究。
背景:虽然认知行为疗法(CBT)被推荐用于治疗精神分裂症患者,但在临床实践中尚未得到充分利用。低强度CBT(由非专业人员提供的疗程较少)有望提供部分解决方案;然而,它在社区护理环境中的实施仍然有限。目的:探讨家访护士在为精神分裂症患者提供低强度认知行为治疗时面临的困难和障碍。方法:通过半结构化访谈对6名日本护士进行定性描述性研究,这些护士具有提供低强度CBT的经验,包括精神病CBT (CBT -p)和个性化精神病元认知训练(MCT+)。数据分析采用定性描述方法。结果:发现了三种主要的困难/障碍:“学习低强度CBT的困难”,“对个体客户应用低强度CBT的困难”和“由于家访护理的独特结构和功能,提供低强度CBT的困难”。结论:研究结果表明,需要用简化的术语和熟悉的例子来完善实施手册;创造一个可以与主管持续协商和相互学习的工作环境;修订国家健康保险计划下的报销制度,以便延长出诊时间;培训非专业护士作为合作治疗师,以确保护理的连续性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
3.20%
发文量
82
期刊介绍: The Journal of Research in Nursing is a leading peer reviewed journal that blends good research with contemporary debates about policy and practice. The Journal of Research in Nursing contributes knowledge to nursing practice, research and local, national and international health and social care policy. Each issue contains a variety of papers and review commentaries within a specific theme. The editors are advised and supported by a board of key academics, practitioners and policy makers of international standing. The Journal of Research in Nursing will: • Ensure an evidence base to your practice and policy development • Inform your research work at an advanced level • Challenge you to critically reflect on the interface between practice, policy and research
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信