Total Knee Arthroplasty in End-Stage Knee Osteoarthritis with Tibia Stress Fractures- A Propensity Score Matched Comparative Study.

IF 1.2 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS
Abhay Elhence, Saurabh Gupta, Sanchit Roy, Sumit Banerjee, Nitesh Gahlot, Sandeep Yadav, Prabodh Kantiwal, Rajesh Kumar Rajnish
{"title":"Total Knee Arthroplasty in End-Stage Knee Osteoarthritis with Tibia Stress Fractures- A Propensity Score Matched Comparative Study.","authors":"Abhay Elhence, Saurabh Gupta, Sanchit Roy, Sumit Banerjee, Nitesh Gahlot, Sandeep Yadav, Prabodh Kantiwal, Rajesh Kumar Rajnish","doi":"10.22038/ABJS.2024.78268.3601","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Knee osteoarthritis (KO) is a leading contributor to disability years, with a prevalence ranging from 22% to 39%. Tibia stress fractures (TSFs) are well-described for end-stage arthritis patients undergoing TKA. Literature is ambiguous, with a wide range of management options. This study primarily aims to compare and determine the clinical, functional, and radiological outcomes of TSFs in end-stage KO treated with TKA by propensity score-based matching.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>It is a retrospective, single-center, comparative study conducted at University Teaching Hospital. The institutional medical records (IMRs) database was inquired. The TSF group included all patients of end-stage KO who underwent primary TKA with TSFs, and the TKA group included matched patients without TSF. Cases were 3:1 (TKA: TSF) propensity score-matched (PSM). The primary outcome was a PSM comparison of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and 1-year Postoperative Complications and Adverse Events (POCAE). PROMs included the knee society score (KSS), patient satisfaction (PS), and KSS functional activities (FA) score.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Study includes thirty-seven patients. Both groups showed no statistically significant difference in KSS FA and KSS PS scores. At the final follow-up, MCID for KSS FA was achieved by 31 patients (96.9%) in the TSF group compared to 92 patients (95.83%) in the TKA group. MCID for KSS PS was achieved by 29 patients (90.63%) in the TSF group compared to 91 patients (94.79%) in the TKA group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>End-stage KO patients with coexisting TSFs who undergo primary TKA with stem/ plate fixation as per fracture location may expect favorable PROMs, POAECs, radiological outcomes, and rates of achieving the MCID at a minimum 2-year follow-up. Accurate management of such cases results in excellent outcomes and minimized revision rates. All patients achieved complete bone union. These results were comparable to the PSM control group.</p>","PeriodicalId":46704,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Bone and Joint Surgery-ABJS","volume":"13 5","pages":"281-290"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12232567/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Bone and Joint Surgery-ABJS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22038/ABJS.2024.78268.3601","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Knee osteoarthritis (KO) is a leading contributor to disability years, with a prevalence ranging from 22% to 39%. Tibia stress fractures (TSFs) are well-described for end-stage arthritis patients undergoing TKA. Literature is ambiguous, with a wide range of management options. This study primarily aims to compare and determine the clinical, functional, and radiological outcomes of TSFs in end-stage KO treated with TKA by propensity score-based matching.

Methods: It is a retrospective, single-center, comparative study conducted at University Teaching Hospital. The institutional medical records (IMRs) database was inquired. The TSF group included all patients of end-stage KO who underwent primary TKA with TSFs, and the TKA group included matched patients without TSF. Cases were 3:1 (TKA: TSF) propensity score-matched (PSM). The primary outcome was a PSM comparison of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and 1-year Postoperative Complications and Adverse Events (POCAE). PROMs included the knee society score (KSS), patient satisfaction (PS), and KSS functional activities (FA) score.

Results: Study includes thirty-seven patients. Both groups showed no statistically significant difference in KSS FA and KSS PS scores. At the final follow-up, MCID for KSS FA was achieved by 31 patients (96.9%) in the TSF group compared to 92 patients (95.83%) in the TKA group. MCID for KSS PS was achieved by 29 patients (90.63%) in the TSF group compared to 91 patients (94.79%) in the TKA group.

Conclusion: End-stage KO patients with coexisting TSFs who undergo primary TKA with stem/ plate fixation as per fracture location may expect favorable PROMs, POAECs, radiological outcomes, and rates of achieving the MCID at a minimum 2-year follow-up. Accurate management of such cases results in excellent outcomes and minimized revision rates. All patients achieved complete bone union. These results were comparable to the PSM control group.

终末期膝关节骨性关节炎伴胫骨应力性骨折的全膝关节置换术——倾向评分匹配的比较研究。
目的:膝关节骨关节炎(KO)是导致残疾年的主要原因,患病率为22%至39%。胫骨应力性骨折(TSFs)是终末期关节炎患者接受TKA的良好描述。文献是模棱两可的,有广泛的管理选择。本研究主要目的是通过基于倾向评分的匹配来比较和确定TKA治疗终末期KO的tsf的临床、功能和放射学结果。方法:在大学附属教学医院进行回顾性、单中心、比较研究。对机构医疗记录数据库进行了查询。TSF组包括所有原发性TKA合并TSF的终末期KO患者,TKA组包括匹配的无TSF患者。病例为3:1 (TKA: TSF)倾向评分匹配(PSM)。主要结果是患者报告的结果测量(PROMs)和1年术后并发症和不良事件(POCAE)的PSM比较。PROMs包括膝关节社会评分(KSS)、患者满意度(PS)和KSS功能活动评分(FA)。结果:研究纳入37例患者。两组KSS FA、KSS PS评分差异无统计学意义。在最后的随访中,TSF组有31例患者(96.9%)达到KSS FA的MCID,而TKA组有92例患者(95.83%)达到MCID。TSF组29例患者(90.63%)达到KSS PS的MCID,而TKA组为91例患者(94.79%)。结论:在至少2年的随访中,合并合并tsf的终末期KO患者接受原发性TKA并根据骨折位置进行柄/钢板固定,可以预期良好的PROMs、poaec、放射学结果和达到MCID的比率。这种情况下的准确管理结果良好的结果和最低的修订率。所有患者均实现骨完全愈合。这些结果与PSM对照组相当。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
128
期刊介绍: The Archives of Bone and Joint Surgery (ABJS) aims to encourage a better understanding of all aspects of Orthopedic Sciences. The journal accepts scientific papers including original research, review article, short communication, case report, and letter to the editor in all fields of bone, joint, musculoskeletal surgery and related researches. The Archives of Bone and Joint Surgery (ABJS) will publish papers in all aspects of today`s modern orthopedic sciences including: Arthroscopy, Arthroplasty, Sport Medicine, Reconstruction, Hand and Upper Extremity, Pediatric Orthopedics, Spine, Trauma, Foot and Ankle, Tumor, Joint Rheumatic Disease, Skeletal Imaging, Orthopedic Physical Therapy, Rehabilitation, Orthopedic Basic Sciences (Biomechanics, Biotechnology, Biomaterial..).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信