Periarticular Versus Intravenous Corticosteroids in Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

IF 1.2 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS
Ralph Maroun, Mohammad Daher, Jonathan Liu, Alan H Daniels, Thomas J Barrett, Mouhanad M El-Othmani
{"title":"Periarticular Versus Intravenous Corticosteroids in Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.","authors":"Ralph Maroun, Mohammad Daher, Jonathan Liu, Alan H Daniels, Thomas J Barrett, Mouhanad M El-Othmani","doi":"10.22038/ABJS.2025.84324.3834","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Despite the extensive research revolving around total knee arthroplasty (TKA), the optimal steroid administration route remains unclear. This study aimed to compare the clinical efficacy of intravenous (IV) to periarticular (PA) steroid administration in TKA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Embase, PubMed, Cochrane, and Google Scholar were searched till April 2024 for randomized controlled trials (RCT) comparing IV to PA steroids in TKA. Each trial was assessed using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool and classified as having a High, Low, or Unclear risk of bias. The clinical outcomes of interest were post-operative pain (reported as the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)), vomiting, post-operative range of motion (reported as knee flexion angle), post-operative IL-6 and CRP, and glucose levels. Post-operative complications such as surgical site or deep infections, and wound dehiscence following TKA were also recorded and assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Five RCTs with a total of 501 patients were included in this review. There were no significant differences in pain at rest on post-operative day (POD) 1 and 2 and during activity between PA and IV administration, while pain at rest on POD 3 was lower in the PA group (I2 =38% SMD=-0.27; 95% CI: -0.5, -0.04, P=0.02). Post-operative complications, knee flexion, and laboratory values such as IL-6, CPR, and glucose showed no significant difference between the groups, while vomiting rates were significantly higher in the PA group (I2= 0% OR=2.43; 95% CI: 1.36-4.35, P=0.003).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>PA and IV peri-operative administration of glucocorticoids in TKA have similar clinical outcomes in inflammation reduction, knee flexion function, adverse event rates, and post-operative pain at rest during the first 48 hours post-operatively and at activity, while the PA group is associated with lower pain at rest on POD 3 and a higher rate of post-operative vomiting.</p>","PeriodicalId":46704,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Bone and Joint Surgery-ABJS","volume":"13 5","pages":"237-248"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12232571/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Bone and Joint Surgery-ABJS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22038/ABJS.2025.84324.3834","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Despite the extensive research revolving around total knee arthroplasty (TKA), the optimal steroid administration route remains unclear. This study aimed to compare the clinical efficacy of intravenous (IV) to periarticular (PA) steroid administration in TKA.

Methods: Embase, PubMed, Cochrane, and Google Scholar were searched till April 2024 for randomized controlled trials (RCT) comparing IV to PA steroids in TKA. Each trial was assessed using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool and classified as having a High, Low, or Unclear risk of bias. The clinical outcomes of interest were post-operative pain (reported as the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)), vomiting, post-operative range of motion (reported as knee flexion angle), post-operative IL-6 and CRP, and glucose levels. Post-operative complications such as surgical site or deep infections, and wound dehiscence following TKA were also recorded and assessed.

Results: Five RCTs with a total of 501 patients were included in this review. There were no significant differences in pain at rest on post-operative day (POD) 1 and 2 and during activity between PA and IV administration, while pain at rest on POD 3 was lower in the PA group (I2 =38% SMD=-0.27; 95% CI: -0.5, -0.04, P=0.02). Post-operative complications, knee flexion, and laboratory values such as IL-6, CPR, and glucose showed no significant difference between the groups, while vomiting rates were significantly higher in the PA group (I2= 0% OR=2.43; 95% CI: 1.36-4.35, P=0.003).

Conclusion: PA and IV peri-operative administration of glucocorticoids in TKA have similar clinical outcomes in inflammation reduction, knee flexion function, adverse event rates, and post-operative pain at rest during the first 48 hours post-operatively and at activity, while the PA group is associated with lower pain at rest on POD 3 and a higher rate of post-operative vomiting.

全膝关节置换术中关节周围与静脉注射皮质类固醇:随机对照试验的系统回顾和荟萃分析。
目的:尽管围绕全膝关节置换术(TKA)进行了广泛的研究,但最佳类固醇给药途径仍不清楚。本研究旨在比较静脉注射(IV)和关节周围注射(PA)类固醇治疗TKA的临床疗效。方法:检索Embase、PubMed、Cochrane和谷歌Scholar,检索截至2024年4月比较IV和PA类固醇治疗TKA的随机对照试验(RCT)。每个试验使用Cochrane风险偏倚工具进行评估,并将其分类为高、低或不明确的偏倚风险。临床结果包括术后疼痛(以视觉模拟量表(VAS)和数值评定量表(NRS)报告)、呕吐、术后活动范围(以膝关节屈曲角度报告)、术后IL-6和CRP以及血糖水平。术后并发症,如手术部位或深部感染,TKA后伤口裂开也被记录和评估。结果:本综述纳入了5项随机对照试验,共501例患者。PA组和IV组术后第1、2天休息时疼痛和活动时疼痛无显著差异,而PA组术后第3天休息时疼痛较低(I2 =38% SMD=-0.27;95% ci: -0.5, -0.04, p =0.02)。术后并发症、膝关节屈曲、IL-6、心肺复苏术、血糖等实验室指标在两组间无显著差异,而PA组呕吐率明显高于PA组(I2= 0% OR=2.43;95% ci: 1.36-4.35, p =0.003)。结论:全膝关节置换术围手术期给予糖皮质激素与静脉给予糖皮质激素在消炎、膝关节屈曲功能、不良事件发生率、术后48小时及活动时静息疼痛方面具有相似的临床结果,而PA组POD 3静息疼痛较低,术后呕吐率较高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
128
期刊介绍: The Archives of Bone and Joint Surgery (ABJS) aims to encourage a better understanding of all aspects of Orthopedic Sciences. The journal accepts scientific papers including original research, review article, short communication, case report, and letter to the editor in all fields of bone, joint, musculoskeletal surgery and related researches. The Archives of Bone and Joint Surgery (ABJS) will publish papers in all aspects of today`s modern orthopedic sciences including: Arthroscopy, Arthroplasty, Sport Medicine, Reconstruction, Hand and Upper Extremity, Pediatric Orthopedics, Spine, Trauma, Foot and Ankle, Tumor, Joint Rheumatic Disease, Skeletal Imaging, Orthopedic Physical Therapy, Rehabilitation, Orthopedic Basic Sciences (Biomechanics, Biotechnology, Biomaterial..).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信