Cemented Versus Cementless Total Knee Arthroplasty: Analysis of the Latest Literature Data.

IF 1.8 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS
E Carlos Rodriguez-Merchan
{"title":"Cemented Versus Cementless Total Knee Arthroplasty: Analysis of the Latest Literature Data.","authors":"E Carlos Rodriguez-Merchan","doi":"10.22038/ABJS.2024.83365.3796","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The use of cementless total knee arthorplasty (TKA) has increased in recent years to the detriment of the use of cemented TKA. However, there is still no agreement on when to cement and in whom. A recent meta-analysis has shown that the cumulative survival at 12 years was 97% for the cementless implants and 89% for the cemented implants. Besides, no differences between the cemented and cementless TKAs were found in patient-reported results and revision rates. Another study showed noninferiority to cemented TKA. Its authors stated that cementles TKA can be utilized as an alternative mode of fixation in individuals opting for primary TKA. However, it was mentioned that additional long-run follow-up was required to confirm if cementless TKA can exhibit improved survivorship over cemented TKA. In individuals > 70 years of age, cementless TKA accomplished clinical scores equivalent to those of younger individuals at 2-year follow-up. Cementless TKA seemed to be a safe alternative for older individuals. Another meta-analysis has shown a substantial reduction in all-cause revisions and revisions for aseptic loosening when utilizing cementless fixation in high body mass index individuals when compared to the usage of cemented implants. In conclusion, clinical practice guidelines are required to ensure safe and efficacious usage of cementless fixation.</p>","PeriodicalId":46704,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Bone and Joint Surgery-ABJS","volume":"13 5","pages":"29-303"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12232569/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Bone and Joint Surgery-ABJS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22038/ABJS.2024.83365.3796","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The use of cementless total knee arthorplasty (TKA) has increased in recent years to the detriment of the use of cemented TKA. However, there is still no agreement on when to cement and in whom. A recent meta-analysis has shown that the cumulative survival at 12 years was 97% for the cementless implants and 89% for the cemented implants. Besides, no differences between the cemented and cementless TKAs were found in patient-reported results and revision rates. Another study showed noninferiority to cemented TKA. Its authors stated that cementles TKA can be utilized as an alternative mode of fixation in individuals opting for primary TKA. However, it was mentioned that additional long-run follow-up was required to confirm if cementless TKA can exhibit improved survivorship over cemented TKA. In individuals > 70 years of age, cementless TKA accomplished clinical scores equivalent to those of younger individuals at 2-year follow-up. Cementless TKA seemed to be a safe alternative for older individuals. Another meta-analysis has shown a substantial reduction in all-cause revisions and revisions for aseptic loosening when utilizing cementless fixation in high body mass index individuals when compared to the usage of cemented implants. In conclusion, clinical practice guidelines are required to ensure safe and efficacious usage of cementless fixation.

骨水泥与无骨水泥全膝关节置换术:最新文献数据分析。
近年来,无骨水泥全膝关节置换术(TKA)的使用有所增加,这不利于骨水泥全膝关节置换术的使用。然而,对于何时和由谁来加固,目前仍未达成一致。最近的一项荟萃分析显示,非骨水泥种植体12年的累积生存率为97%,骨水泥种植体为89%。此外,在患者报告的结果和翻修率方面,没有发现骨水泥和非骨水泥tka之间的差异。另一项研究显示骨水泥TKA无劣效性。作者指出,骨水泥TKA可作为选择原发性TKA的个体的另一种固定方式。然而,需要额外的长期随访来确认非骨水泥TKA是否比骨水泥TKA表现出更高的生存率。在70岁以下的个体中,无骨水泥TKA在2年随访中获得的临床评分与年轻人相当。对于老年人来说,无水泥TKA似乎是一种安全的选择。另一项荟萃分析显示,与使用骨水泥植入物相比,在高体重指数个体中使用无骨水泥固定时,无菌性松动的全因翻修和翻修大幅减少。总之,需要临床实践指南来确保安全有效地使用无骨水泥固定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
128
期刊介绍: The Archives of Bone and Joint Surgery (ABJS) aims to encourage a better understanding of all aspects of Orthopedic Sciences. The journal accepts scientific papers including original research, review article, short communication, case report, and letter to the editor in all fields of bone, joint, musculoskeletal surgery and related researches. The Archives of Bone and Joint Surgery (ABJS) will publish papers in all aspects of today`s modern orthopedic sciences including: Arthroscopy, Arthroplasty, Sport Medicine, Reconstruction, Hand and Upper Extremity, Pediatric Orthopedics, Spine, Trauma, Foot and Ankle, Tumor, Joint Rheumatic Disease, Skeletal Imaging, Orthopedic Physical Therapy, Rehabilitation, Orthopedic Basic Sciences (Biomechanics, Biotechnology, Biomaterial..).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信