Pathologist performed ultrasound guided fine needle aspiration (US-FNA): current status, trends, and insights from the American Society of Cytopathology Sponsored Survey.

Q2 Medicine
Daniel F I Kurtycz, Zubair W Baloch, Ronald Balassanian, Terrance Lynn, Poonam Vohra, Maoxin Wu
{"title":"Pathologist performed ultrasound guided fine needle aspiration (US-FNA): current status, trends, and insights from the American Society of Cytopathology Sponsored Survey.","authors":"Daniel F I Kurtycz, Zubair W Baloch, Ronald Balassanian, Terrance Lynn, Poonam Vohra, Maoxin Wu","doi":"10.1016/j.jasc.2025.05.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (US-FNA) performed by cytopathologists represents prospects for expanding cytopathology practice. While there is a perceived need for further education and standardization to support future opportunities, this need remains insufficiently documented. The Product Innovation Committee of the American Society of Cytopathology conducted a survey to gather opinions and examine current practices in US-FNA.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>An online survey of 32 questions focused on US-FNA practice was open from December 19, 2022, to March 19, 2023, promoted through national and international cytopathology professional societies, using Qualtrics survey software.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 216 individuals accessed the survey, with 174 (68% from the USA) successfully completing a qualifying question. Data collected included information on certification, work setting, workload, and years of practice (mean: 16 years, range: 0-50 years). Fifty-nine percent (80/135) were certified in cytopathology by the American Board of Pathology or the International Academy of Cytology. Sixty-three percent (84/134) practiced in academia. Over one-half (70/123) worked in low-volume settings (0-50 US-FNA procedures/year), while 19% worked in medium-to-high volume settings (>300 US-FNA procedures/year). Responses showed variability in diagnostic practices and patient management. Nearly one-half (67/137) of respondents indicated that their pathologists performed US-FNA. Most, but not all, reported following standard procedures, including informed consent, site verification, procedure time-out, and documentation of both the procedure and ultrasound findings.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Pathologist performed US-FNA represents an opportunity for growth, but there are significant barriers to adoption including: training, equipment, reimbursement, and procedural variability. This survey stands as an initial step to developing recommendations on best practices.</p>","PeriodicalId":38262,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Society of Cytopathology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Society of Cytopathology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jasc.2025.05.001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (US-FNA) performed by cytopathologists represents prospects for expanding cytopathology practice. While there is a perceived need for further education and standardization to support future opportunities, this need remains insufficiently documented. The Product Innovation Committee of the American Society of Cytopathology conducted a survey to gather opinions and examine current practices in US-FNA.

Materials and methods: An online survey of 32 questions focused on US-FNA practice was open from December 19, 2022, to March 19, 2023, promoted through national and international cytopathology professional societies, using Qualtrics survey software.

Results: A total of 216 individuals accessed the survey, with 174 (68% from the USA) successfully completing a qualifying question. Data collected included information on certification, work setting, workload, and years of practice (mean: 16 years, range: 0-50 years). Fifty-nine percent (80/135) were certified in cytopathology by the American Board of Pathology or the International Academy of Cytology. Sixty-three percent (84/134) practiced in academia. Over one-half (70/123) worked in low-volume settings (0-50 US-FNA procedures/year), while 19% worked in medium-to-high volume settings (>300 US-FNA procedures/year). Responses showed variability in diagnostic practices and patient management. Nearly one-half (67/137) of respondents indicated that their pathologists performed US-FNA. Most, but not all, reported following standard procedures, including informed consent, site verification, procedure time-out, and documentation of both the procedure and ultrasound findings.

Conclusions: Pathologist performed US-FNA represents an opportunity for growth, but there are significant barriers to adoption including: training, equipment, reimbursement, and procedural variability. This survey stands as an initial step to developing recommendations on best practices.

病理学家进行超声引导细针抽吸(US-FNA):美国细胞病理学协会赞助调查的现状、趋势和见解。
由细胞病理学家执行的超声引导细针穿刺(US-FNA)代表了扩大细胞病理学实践的前景。虽然人们认为需要进一步的教育和标准化来支持未来的机会,但这种需求仍然没有得到充分的记录。美国细胞病理学学会产品创新委员会进行了一项调查,以收集意见并检查US-FNA的现行做法。材料与方法:于2022年12月19日至2023年3月19日,通过国内和国际细胞病理学专业学会,使用Qualtrics调查软件,对US-FNA实践进行了32个问题的在线调查。结果:共有216人参与了调查,其中174人(68%来自美国)成功完成了一个合格问题。收集的数据包括有关认证、工作设置、工作量和实践年数的信息(平均:16年,范围:0-50年)。59%(80/135)的人获得了美国病理委员会或国际细胞学学会的细胞病理学认证。63%(84/134)在学术界工作。超过一半(70/123)的人在低容量环境中工作(每年0-50次US-FNA程序),而19%的人在中高容量环境中工作(每年300次US-FNA程序)。反应显示在诊断实践和患者管理方面存在差异。近一半(67/137)的受访者表示他们的病理学家进行了US-FNA。大多数(但不是全部)报告遵循了标准程序,包括知情同意、现场验证、程序暂停以及程序和超声结果的记录。结论:病理学家进行US-FNA代表了增长的机会,但采用存在重大障碍,包括:培训,设备,报销和程序可变性。这项调查是制定最佳做法建议的第一步。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of the American Society of Cytopathology
Journal of the American Society of Cytopathology Medicine-Pathology and Forensic Medicine
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
226
审稿时长
40 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信