Omega-3 Polyunsaturated Fatty Acids and Adipose Tissue Inflammation in Humans: A Scoping Review.

IF 5.9 2区 医学 Q1 NUTRITION & DIETETICS
Ji-Eun Chon, Kira Zhi Hua Lai, Zhila Semnani-Azad, Adam H Metherel, David J A Jenkins, Richard P Bazinet, Anthony J Hanley
{"title":"Omega-3 Polyunsaturated Fatty Acids and Adipose Tissue Inflammation in Humans: A Scoping Review.","authors":"Ji-Eun Chon, Kira Zhi Hua Lai, Zhila Semnani-Azad, Adam H Metherel, David J A Jenkins, Richard P Bazinet, Anthony J Hanley","doi":"10.1093/nutrit/nuaf089","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Adipose tissue (AT) inflammation is a topic of increasing interest given its role in initiating systemic subclinical inflammation. Evidence from preclinical studies suggests that n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs) may ameliorate AT inflammation through various pathways. However, fewer data are available from humans, and existing studies are heterogeneous in design and findings. The objective of this scoping review was to identify, review, and map the current literature on the relationship between n-3 PUFAs and AT inflammation in healthy humans. MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases were searched from inception to August 4, 2022. Eligible studies included experimental trials and observational studies, enrolling nonpregnant adult study populations free of diagnosed chronic/infectious diseases. Screening and data extraction were performed on study characteristics. Overall, the 25 retained studies were heterogeneous in study design, intervention formulation/exposure assessment, comparator, study duration, and methods used to characterize AT inflammation. Most experimental trials used EPA+DHA [eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA, 20:5n-3) and docosapentaenoic acid (DPA, 22:5n-3)] supplementation and measured circulating adiponectin and leptin to characterize AT inflammation. A wide range of comparators were employed, including saturated/unsaturated oils, ketogenic diets, and n-6 PUFAs. All observational studies reported a significant association with ≥1 of their primary outcomes, while 15 of 20 experimental trials documented a significant effect of n-3 supplementation on ≥1 outcomes. Existing human literature on n-3 PUFAs and AT inflammation is inconclusive due to the limited number of studies available and their heterogeneous designs. Therefore, larger, longer-term longitudinal studies and experimental trials using AT biopsy measures or validated AT-specific biomarkers are needed. Registration: Open Science Framework (https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/29WGQ).</p>","PeriodicalId":19469,"journal":{"name":"Nutrition reviews","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nutrition reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/nutrit/nuaf089","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Adipose tissue (AT) inflammation is a topic of increasing interest given its role in initiating systemic subclinical inflammation. Evidence from preclinical studies suggests that n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs) may ameliorate AT inflammation through various pathways. However, fewer data are available from humans, and existing studies are heterogeneous in design and findings. The objective of this scoping review was to identify, review, and map the current literature on the relationship between n-3 PUFAs and AT inflammation in healthy humans. MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases were searched from inception to August 4, 2022. Eligible studies included experimental trials and observational studies, enrolling nonpregnant adult study populations free of diagnosed chronic/infectious diseases. Screening and data extraction were performed on study characteristics. Overall, the 25 retained studies were heterogeneous in study design, intervention formulation/exposure assessment, comparator, study duration, and methods used to characterize AT inflammation. Most experimental trials used EPA+DHA [eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA, 20:5n-3) and docosapentaenoic acid (DPA, 22:5n-3)] supplementation and measured circulating adiponectin and leptin to characterize AT inflammation. A wide range of comparators were employed, including saturated/unsaturated oils, ketogenic diets, and n-6 PUFAs. All observational studies reported a significant association with ≥1 of their primary outcomes, while 15 of 20 experimental trials documented a significant effect of n-3 supplementation on ≥1 outcomes. Existing human literature on n-3 PUFAs and AT inflammation is inconclusive due to the limited number of studies available and their heterogeneous designs. Therefore, larger, longer-term longitudinal studies and experimental trials using AT biopsy measures or validated AT-specific biomarkers are needed. Registration: Open Science Framework (https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/29WGQ).

Omega-3多不饱和脂肪酸和人类脂肪组织炎症:范围综述。
脂肪组织(AT)炎症是一个越来越感兴趣的话题,因为它在启动全身亚临床炎症中的作用。来自临床前研究的证据表明,n-3多不饱和脂肪酸(PUFAs)可能通过多种途径改善AT炎症。然而,来自人类的数据较少,现有的研究在设计和发现上都是异质的。本综述的目的是识别、回顾和绘制当前关于健康人n-3 PUFAs与AT炎症之间关系的文献。检索了MEDLINE、EMBASE和Cochrane数据库,检索时间从创建到2022年8月4日。符合条件的研究包括实验试验和观察性研究,纳入无诊断慢性/传染性疾病的未怀孕成人研究人群。对研究特征进行筛选和数据提取。总的来说,25项保留的研究在研究设计、干预制剂/暴露评估、比较物、研究持续时间和用于表征AT炎症的方法方面存在异质性。大多数实验使用EPA+DHA[二十碳五烯酸(EPA, 20:5n-3)和二十碳五烯酸(DPA, 22:5n-3)]补充,并测量循环脂联素和瘦素来表征AT炎症。采用了广泛的比较物,包括饱和/不饱和油,生酮饮食和n-6 PUFAs。所有观察性研究都报告了n-3与≥1个主要结局的显著关联,而20项实验试验中有15项记录了n-3补充剂对≥1个结局的显著影响。现有关于n-3 PUFAs和AT炎症的人类文献是不确定的,因为可用的研究数量有限,而且它们的设计是异质的。因此,需要更大规模、更长期的纵向研究和使用AT活检测量或经验证的AT特异性生物标志物的实验试验。注册:开放科学框架(https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/29WGQ)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Nutrition reviews
Nutrition reviews 医学-营养学
CiteScore
12.20
自引率
1.60%
发文量
121
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Nutrition Reviews is a highly cited, monthly, international, peer-reviewed journal that specializes in the publication of authoritative and critical literature reviews on current and emerging topics in nutrition science, food science, clinical nutrition, and nutrition policy. Readers of Nutrition Reviews include nutrition scientists, biomedical researchers, clinical and dietetic practitioners, and advanced students of nutrition.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信