Utilizing Predictive Analytics to Understand Neurogenic Bladder Symptom Score (NBSS) Variations in Adults With Acquired Spinal Cord Injury.

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Neurourology and Urodynamics Pub Date : 2025-09-01 Epub Date: 2025-07-09 DOI:10.1002/nau.70116
Mehran Nejad-Mansouri, Daniel Lizotte, Jeremy Myers, Sean Elliott, John T Stoffel, Sara Lenherr, Rhiannon Lyons, Tianyue Zhong, Blayne Welk
{"title":"Utilizing Predictive Analytics to Understand Neurogenic Bladder Symptom Score (NBSS) Variations in Adults With Acquired Spinal Cord Injury.","authors":"Mehran Nejad-Mansouri, Daniel Lizotte, Jeremy Myers, Sean Elliott, John T Stoffel, Sara Lenherr, Rhiannon Lyons, Tianyue Zhong, Blayne Welk","doi":"10.1002/nau.70116","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI) have varying bladder health trajectories after their injury. We explored whether a predictive machine learning model could identify which variables impact urinary symptoms.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used 238 variables from the Neurogenic Bladder Research Group SCI registry for a Decision Tree analysis (eCHAID technique). The primary outcomes were the baseline Neurogenic Bladder Symptom Score (NBSS), and the change from the baseline NBSS at 1-year follow up (measured as better/worse than the median change).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 1479 participants, mean baseline NBSS was 24.16 ± 0.28 (standard error of the mean). Our decision tree that evaluated the NBSS at baseline predicted that individuals with a suprapubic tube/urostomy as their primary bladder management method and good bowel QOL at baseline had the lowest (best) mean baseline NBSS at 13.44 ± 0.83. In contrast, females with baseline spontaneous voiding had the highest (worst) mean baseline NBSS at 34.42 ± 1.05. Our second decision tree evaluated the change in the NBSS at 1-year follow-up. Of the 711 participants that performed better than the median change (i.e., improved), 45% were accounted for jointly by women who did not use bladder relaxing medications at baseline, and men without a history of prior urinary tract infections who used a single bladder management method at follow-up. The predictive capacity the decision tree was 57%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Decision tree models help identify combinations of patient characteristics which correlate with urinary symptoms after SCI. However, there was a limited predictive capacity of the decision tree to forecast future bladder symptoms.</p>","PeriodicalId":19200,"journal":{"name":"Neurourology and Urodynamics","volume":" ","pages":"1466-1473"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12319491/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurourology and Urodynamics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/nau.70116","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI) have varying bladder health trajectories after their injury. We explored whether a predictive machine learning model could identify which variables impact urinary symptoms.

Methods: We used 238 variables from the Neurogenic Bladder Research Group SCI registry for a Decision Tree analysis (eCHAID technique). The primary outcomes were the baseline Neurogenic Bladder Symptom Score (NBSS), and the change from the baseline NBSS at 1-year follow up (measured as better/worse than the median change).

Results: Among the 1479 participants, mean baseline NBSS was 24.16 ± 0.28 (standard error of the mean). Our decision tree that evaluated the NBSS at baseline predicted that individuals with a suprapubic tube/urostomy as their primary bladder management method and good bowel QOL at baseline had the lowest (best) mean baseline NBSS at 13.44 ± 0.83. In contrast, females with baseline spontaneous voiding had the highest (worst) mean baseline NBSS at 34.42 ± 1.05. Our second decision tree evaluated the change in the NBSS at 1-year follow-up. Of the 711 participants that performed better than the median change (i.e., improved), 45% were accounted for jointly by women who did not use bladder relaxing medications at baseline, and men without a history of prior urinary tract infections who used a single bladder management method at follow-up. The predictive capacity the decision tree was 57%.

Conclusions: Decision tree models help identify combinations of patient characteristics which correlate with urinary symptoms after SCI. However, there was a limited predictive capacity of the decision tree to forecast future bladder symptoms.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

利用预测分析了解获得性脊髓损伤成人神经源性膀胱症状评分(NBSS)的变化。
简介:脊髓损伤(SCI)患者在损伤后膀胱健康轨迹不同。我们探索了预测机器学习模型是否可以识别哪些变量影响泌尿系统症状。方法:我们使用神经源性膀胱研究小组SCI登记处的238个变量进行决策树分析(eCHAID技术)。主要结果是基线神经源性膀胱症状评分(NBSS),以及1年随访时基线NBSS的变化(以比中位数变化更好/更差来衡量)。结果:在1479名参与者中,平均基线NBSS为24.16±0.28(平均标准误差)。我们评估基线时NBSS的决策树预测,以耻骨上管/泌尿造口术作为主要膀胱管理方法且基线时肠道生活质量良好的个体的平均基线NBSS最低(最佳),为13.44±0.83。相比之下,基线自然排尿的女性平均基线NBSS最高(最差),为34.42±1.05。我们的第二个决策树评估了1年随访时NBSS的变化。在711名表现优于中位数变化(即改善)的参与者中,45%的女性在基线时没有使用膀胱松弛药物,而男性在随访时没有尿路感染史,使用单一膀胱管理方法。决策树的预测能力为57%。结论:决策树模型有助于识别与脊髓损伤后泌尿系统症状相关的患者特征组合。然而,决策树预测未来膀胱症状的能力有限。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Neurourology and Urodynamics
Neurourology and Urodynamics 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
10.00%
发文量
231
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Neurourology and Urodynamics welcomes original scientific contributions from all parts of the world on topics related to urinary tract function, urinary and fecal continence and pelvic floor function.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信