Rafael Martinez-Perez, Ahmed Aljuboori, Jorge Mura
{"title":"A vascularized \"superfascial\" flap for middle cranial Fossa reconstruction: technical note.","authors":"Rafael Martinez-Perez, Ahmed Aljuboori, Jorge Mura","doi":"10.1007/s10143-025-03692-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Reconstruction of the middle cranial fossa following extensive dural resection remains challenging, particularly in ensuring watertight closure and minimizing complications. We present a consecutive case series of five patients undergoing skull base surgery via a minipretemporal approach, in whom direct dural closure was not feasible due to resection-related dural loss or intraoperative dehiscence. A vascularized \"superfascial\" flap was used for reconstruction. This flap combines periosteum, galea, and superficial temporalis fascia in a single vascularized layer, preserving branches of the superficial temporal artery and minimizing risk to the frontal branch of the facial nerve. All patients underwent successful reconstruction without postoperative CSF leak, infection, pseudomeningocele, or wound dehiscence. One patient experienced transient frontalis weakness resolving within 6 weeks. No readmissions or returns to the OR were required. A surgical video and illustrative figures demonstrate flap harvesting and application. Compared to conventional options like the pericranial flap or autologous fat grafts, the superfascial flap offers enhanced vascularity, broader reach to lateral skull base defects, and excellent cosmetic outcomes. This technique is a reliable alternative in cases where primary closure is not achievable, providing robust coverage without additional donor site morbidity. Its implementation may reduce wound-related complications in select skull base cases.</p>","PeriodicalId":19184,"journal":{"name":"Neurosurgical Review","volume":"48 1","pages":"550"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurosurgical Review","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10143-025-03692-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Reconstruction of the middle cranial fossa following extensive dural resection remains challenging, particularly in ensuring watertight closure and minimizing complications. We present a consecutive case series of five patients undergoing skull base surgery via a minipretemporal approach, in whom direct dural closure was not feasible due to resection-related dural loss or intraoperative dehiscence. A vascularized "superfascial" flap was used for reconstruction. This flap combines periosteum, galea, and superficial temporalis fascia in a single vascularized layer, preserving branches of the superficial temporal artery and minimizing risk to the frontal branch of the facial nerve. All patients underwent successful reconstruction without postoperative CSF leak, infection, pseudomeningocele, or wound dehiscence. One patient experienced transient frontalis weakness resolving within 6 weeks. No readmissions or returns to the OR were required. A surgical video and illustrative figures demonstrate flap harvesting and application. Compared to conventional options like the pericranial flap or autologous fat grafts, the superfascial flap offers enhanced vascularity, broader reach to lateral skull base defects, and excellent cosmetic outcomes. This technique is a reliable alternative in cases where primary closure is not achievable, providing robust coverage without additional donor site morbidity. Its implementation may reduce wound-related complications in select skull base cases.
期刊介绍:
The goal of Neurosurgical Review is to provide a forum for comprehensive reviews on current issues in neurosurgery. Each issue contains up to three reviews, reflecting all important aspects of one topic (a disease or a surgical approach). Comments by a panel of experts within the same issue complete the topic. By providing comprehensive coverage of one topic per issue, Neurosurgical Review combines the topicality of professional journals with the indepth treatment of a monograph. Original papers of high quality are also welcome.