Wake EEG and Sleep Hypoxemia Predicts Poor Driving and Vigilance Following Extended Wakefulness in People With OSA.

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Andrew Vakulin, Garry Cho, David Stevens, Nathaniel S Marshall, Hannah Openshaw, Delwyn J Bartlett, Caroline D Rae, Keith K H Wong, R Doug McEvoy, Ronald R Grunstein, Angela L D'Rozario
{"title":"Wake EEG and Sleep Hypoxemia Predicts Poor Driving and Vigilance Following Extended Wakefulness in People With OSA.","authors":"Andrew Vakulin, Garry Cho, David Stevens, Nathaniel S Marshall, Hannah Openshaw, Delwyn J Bartlett, Caroline D Rae, Keith K H Wong, R Doug McEvoy, Ronald R Grunstein, Angela L D'Rozario","doi":"10.1111/jsr.70131","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) is a highly prevalent but heterogeneous condition which makes identifying patients at risk of vigilance and driving impairment clinically challenging. Resting wake electroencephalography (EEG) is associated with vigilance performance in healthy participants. We examined if rested wake EEG predicted vigilance and driving impairment in OSA following extended wakefulness. Fifty-four patients underwent baseline polysomnography and 28-h extended wakefulness, repeated vigilance assessments (psychomotor vigilance task (PVT), driving simulator) and resting wake EEG (Karolinska drowsiness test). Cluster analysis assigned patients into groups of either resistant (n = 38) or vulnerable (n = 16) to vigilance failure based on PVT and driving performance following extended wakefulness. Backward stepwise regression models and receiver operator characteristics curves were used to determine the strongest clinical and wake EEG predictors of vigilance impairment. The vulnerable OSA group showed impaired PVT and driving performance relative to the resistant group (p < 0.01). Compared with resistant patients, the vulnerable group exhibited increased delta (p < 0.001) and theta (p = 0.003) EEG power across extended wake. Significant predictors of vigilance impairment were (1) baseline wake EEG theta and O<sub>2</sub> Nadir during sleep, explaining 42% of the variance, and (2) delta power and O<sub>2</sub> Nadir explaining 32% of the variance in vigilance performance. ROC analysis showed strong discrimination between vulnerable and resistant patients (AUC 0.85-0.86, sensitivity 73%-87%, specificity 71%-84%). Slow frequency wake EEG activity and sleep hypoxemia at baseline are predictive of subsequent driving simulator and vigilance impairment in patients with OSA following extended wakefulness. This is potentially important for vigilance and fitness-to-drive assessments in OSA. Trial Registration: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry: ACTRN12613001171707.</p>","PeriodicalId":17057,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Sleep Research","volume":" ","pages":"e70131"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Sleep Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jsr.70131","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) is a highly prevalent but heterogeneous condition which makes identifying patients at risk of vigilance and driving impairment clinically challenging. Resting wake electroencephalography (EEG) is associated with vigilance performance in healthy participants. We examined if rested wake EEG predicted vigilance and driving impairment in OSA following extended wakefulness. Fifty-four patients underwent baseline polysomnography and 28-h extended wakefulness, repeated vigilance assessments (psychomotor vigilance task (PVT), driving simulator) and resting wake EEG (Karolinska drowsiness test). Cluster analysis assigned patients into groups of either resistant (n = 38) or vulnerable (n = 16) to vigilance failure based on PVT and driving performance following extended wakefulness. Backward stepwise regression models and receiver operator characteristics curves were used to determine the strongest clinical and wake EEG predictors of vigilance impairment. The vulnerable OSA group showed impaired PVT and driving performance relative to the resistant group (p < 0.01). Compared with resistant patients, the vulnerable group exhibited increased delta (p < 0.001) and theta (p = 0.003) EEG power across extended wake. Significant predictors of vigilance impairment were (1) baseline wake EEG theta and O2 Nadir during sleep, explaining 42% of the variance, and (2) delta power and O2 Nadir explaining 32% of the variance in vigilance performance. ROC analysis showed strong discrimination between vulnerable and resistant patients (AUC 0.85-0.86, sensitivity 73%-87%, specificity 71%-84%). Slow frequency wake EEG activity and sleep hypoxemia at baseline are predictive of subsequent driving simulator and vigilance impairment in patients with OSA following extended wakefulness. This is potentially important for vigilance and fitness-to-drive assessments in OSA. Trial Registration: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry: ACTRN12613001171707.

清醒脑电图和睡眠低氧血症预测OSA患者长时间清醒后驾驶和警觉性差。
阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停(OSA)是一种非常普遍但异质性的疾病,这使得识别具有警觉性和驾驶障碍风险的患者具有临床挑战性。静息觉醒脑电图(EEG)与健康参与者的警觉性表现有关。我们检查了休息清醒脑电图是否能预测长时间清醒后OSA患者的警觉性和驾驶障碍。54例患者接受基线多导睡眠图和28小时延长清醒、重复警觉性评估(精神运动警觉性任务(PVT)、驾驶模拟器)和静息清醒脑电图(卡罗林斯卡嗜睡试验)。基于PVT和长时间清醒后的驾驶表现,聚类分析将患者分为抵抗(n = 38)和易感(n = 16)两组。采用后向逐步回归模型和接收者算子特征曲线确定警觉性障碍的最强临床和清醒脑电图预测因子。与抵抗性OSA组相比,易感OSA组的PVT和驾驶表现受损(睡眠时的p 2 Nadir,解释了42%的方差,(2)δ功率和O2 Nadir解释了警觉性表现32%的方差)。ROC分析显示易感和耐药患者之间存在较强的差异(AUC 0.85-0.86,敏感性73%-87%,特异性71%-84%)。慢频清醒脑电图活动和基线睡眠低氧血症可预测OSA患者在长时间清醒后的驾驶模拟器和警觉性损伤。这对OSA患者的警惕性和健康驾驶评估具有潜在的重要意义。试验注册:澳大利亚新西兰临床试验注册:ACTRN12613001171707。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Sleep Research
Journal of Sleep Research 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
9.00
自引率
6.80%
发文量
234
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Sleep Research is dedicated to basic and clinical sleep research. The Journal publishes original research papers and invited reviews in all areas of sleep research (including biological rhythms). The Journal aims to promote the exchange of ideas between basic and clinical sleep researchers coming from a wide range of backgrounds and disciplines. The Journal will achieve this by publishing papers which use multidisciplinary and novel approaches to answer important questions about sleep, as well as its disorders and the treatment thereof.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信