Epidemiology of Paediatric Injuries Related to Scooter Use in 2020.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 PEDIATRICS
Lara L Cohen, Alina Syros, Joseph S Geller, Brian W Yang, Paul R Allegra, Max Baron, Seth D Dodds
{"title":"Epidemiology of Paediatric Injuries Related to Scooter Use in 2020.","authors":"Lara L Cohen, Alina Syros, Joseph S Geller, Brian W Yang, Paul R Allegra, Max Baron, Seth D Dodds","doi":"10.1111/jpc.70140","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>Powered, or electric, scooters (e-scooters) have recently increased in popularity, resulting in more e-scooter-related trauma. Paediatric e-scooter injuries are of particular concern. Motorised scooter injuries are logged in the National Electronic Injury Surveillance System (NEISS). There are specific codes for powered versus unpowered scooters, allowing for differentiation of scooter-related injuries. Our primary objective was to describe e-scooter injury epidemiology for the year 2020 amongst e-scooter riders to best inform medical providers and public health officials of the most common injuries. Secondary objectives compare powered versus unpowered scooter injuries.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We queried the US Consumer Product Safety Commission's (CPSC) NEISS database for incidents involving powered and unpowered scooters during 2020. We included patients 0 through 18 years old. We excluded patients without known injury and those who left without being seen.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Two-hundred and thirty one patients with powered scooter injuries and 324 with unpowered scooter injuries met the inclusion criteria. Within the powered cohort, 66.7% (154/231) were male and the average age at injury was 11.4 years. Patients using powered scooters were older than those using unpowered scooters (11.4 ± 4.1 versus 7.6 ± 3.6; p < 0.0001) and experienced more head injuries (18.1% versus 13.7%; p < 0.0001). An estimated 5268 patients (CI: 3818, 6718) were treated for powered and 7526 (CI: 4921, 10 132) for unpowered scooter injuries in the US in 2020.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>E-scooters continue to be popular amongst children, with increasing injury prevalence and severity. Given the increasing incidence of severe e-scooter injuries in the paediatric population, we support continued efforts to educate and legislate regarding paediatric e-scooter use.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level III.</p>","PeriodicalId":16648,"journal":{"name":"Journal of paediatrics and child health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of paediatrics and child health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jpc.70140","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: Powered, or electric, scooters (e-scooters) have recently increased in popularity, resulting in more e-scooter-related trauma. Paediatric e-scooter injuries are of particular concern. Motorised scooter injuries are logged in the National Electronic Injury Surveillance System (NEISS). There are specific codes for powered versus unpowered scooters, allowing for differentiation of scooter-related injuries. Our primary objective was to describe e-scooter injury epidemiology for the year 2020 amongst e-scooter riders to best inform medical providers and public health officials of the most common injuries. Secondary objectives compare powered versus unpowered scooter injuries.

Methods: We queried the US Consumer Product Safety Commission's (CPSC) NEISS database for incidents involving powered and unpowered scooters during 2020. We included patients 0 through 18 years old. We excluded patients without known injury and those who left without being seen.

Results: Two-hundred and thirty one patients with powered scooter injuries and 324 with unpowered scooter injuries met the inclusion criteria. Within the powered cohort, 66.7% (154/231) were male and the average age at injury was 11.4 years. Patients using powered scooters were older than those using unpowered scooters (11.4 ± 4.1 versus 7.6 ± 3.6; p < 0.0001) and experienced more head injuries (18.1% versus 13.7%; p < 0.0001). An estimated 5268 patients (CI: 3818, 6718) were treated for powered and 7526 (CI: 4921, 10 132) for unpowered scooter injuries in the US in 2020.

Conclusions: E-scooters continue to be popular amongst children, with increasing injury prevalence and severity. Given the increasing incidence of severe e-scooter injuries in the paediatric population, we support continued efforts to educate and legislate regarding paediatric e-scooter use.

Level of evidence: Level III.

2020年与滑板车使用相关的儿科伤害流行病学。
目的:电动滑板车(e-scooters)最近越来越受欢迎,导致了更多与电动滑板车相关的创伤。儿童电动滑板车的伤害尤其令人担忧。电动滑板车的伤害记录在国家电子伤害监测系统(NEISS)中。电动滑板车和非电动滑板车有特定的规范,允许区分与滑板车相关的伤害。我们的主要目标是描述2020年电动滑板车伤害流行病学,以最好地告知医疗提供者和公共卫生官员最常见的伤害。次要目标比较动力与无动力滑板车的伤害。方法:我们查询了2020年美国消费者产品安全委员会(CPSC) NEISS数据库中涉及电动和非电动滑板车的事件。我们纳入了0到18岁的患者。我们排除了没有已知损伤的患者和那些没有被看到就离开的患者。结果:231例电动滑板车损伤患者和324例非电动滑板车损伤患者符合纳入标准。在有动力的队列中,66.7%(154/231)为男性,平均受伤年龄为11.4岁。使用电动滑板车的患者比使用非电动滑板车的患者年龄大(11.4±4.1比7.6±3.6);结论:电动滑板车在儿童中继续流行,伤害发生率和严重程度都在增加。鉴于儿童中电动滑板车严重伤害的发生率越来越高,我们支持继续努力就儿童电动滑板车的使用进行教育和立法。证据等级:三级。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
5.90%
发文量
487
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Paediatrics and Child Health publishes original research articles of scientific excellence in paediatrics and child health. Research Articles, Case Reports and Letters to the Editor are published, together with invited Reviews, Annotations, Editorial Comments and manuscripts of educational interest.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信