{"title":"A novel machine-learning algorithm to screen for trisomy 21 in first-trimester singleton pregnancies.","authors":"James Osborne, Chris Cockcroft, Carolyn Williams","doi":"10.1080/01443615.2025.2527111","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Antenatal screening for Trisomy 21 (T21) in the UK is performed primarily in the first trimester. Nuchal Translucency (NT), gestational age, Free β-HCG and PAPP-A are used in combination, creating the 'combined' test. Multivariate Gaussian distribution models then determine the chance of T21 expressed as an odds ratio. This study investigates the use of machine-learning algorithms in the prediction of T21 in first-trimester singleton pregnancies and compares their performance to existing screening models.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 86,354 anonymised, first trimester, singleton pregnancy screening cases, including 211 with T21, were used to train and test machine-learning models using adaptive boosting technology. Test case results were compared with pregnancy outcome data to assess performance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A machine-learning model was able to outperform current multivariate distribution models (McNemar's <i>p</i> = .006, AUC 0.978 vs 0.974). False positive rates were reduced from 3.82% to 2.28% (95% CI: 3.56-4.08 and 2.08-2.48 respectively) and overall screen positive rates were reduced from 4.00% to 2.48% (95% CI: 3.74-4.28 and 2.27-2.70 respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Machine-learning algorithms offer demonstrable improvements to first-trimester singleton T21 screening without major changes to the UK programme. Larger datasets and improved outcome data would likely offer further increases in performance.</p>","PeriodicalId":16627,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology","volume":"45 1","pages":"2527111"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01443615.2025.2527111","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Antenatal screening for Trisomy 21 (T21) in the UK is performed primarily in the first trimester. Nuchal Translucency (NT), gestational age, Free β-HCG and PAPP-A are used in combination, creating the 'combined' test. Multivariate Gaussian distribution models then determine the chance of T21 expressed as an odds ratio. This study investigates the use of machine-learning algorithms in the prediction of T21 in first-trimester singleton pregnancies and compares their performance to existing screening models.
Methods: A total of 86,354 anonymised, first trimester, singleton pregnancy screening cases, including 211 with T21, were used to train and test machine-learning models using adaptive boosting technology. Test case results were compared with pregnancy outcome data to assess performance.
Results: A machine-learning model was able to outperform current multivariate distribution models (McNemar's p = .006, AUC 0.978 vs 0.974). False positive rates were reduced from 3.82% to 2.28% (95% CI: 3.56-4.08 and 2.08-2.48 respectively) and overall screen positive rates were reduced from 4.00% to 2.48% (95% CI: 3.74-4.28 and 2.27-2.70 respectively).
Conclusions: Machine-learning algorithms offer demonstrable improvements to first-trimester singleton T21 screening without major changes to the UK programme. Larger datasets and improved outcome data would likely offer further increases in performance.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology represents an established forum for the entire field of obstetrics and gynaecology, publishing a broad range of original, peer-reviewed papers, from scientific and clinical research to reviews relevant to practice. It also includes occasional supplements on clinical symposia. The journal is read widely by trainees in our specialty and we acknowledge a major role in education in Obstetrics and Gynaecology. Past and present editors have recognized the difficulties that junior doctors encounter in achieving their first publications and spend time advising authors during their initial attempts at submission. The journal continues to attract a world-wide readership thanks to the emphasis on practical applicability and its excellent record of drawing on an international base of authors.