A novel machine-learning algorithm to screen for trisomy 21 in first-trimester singleton pregnancies.

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q4 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-07-09 DOI:10.1080/01443615.2025.2527111
James Osborne, Chris Cockcroft, Carolyn Williams
{"title":"A novel machine-learning algorithm to screen for trisomy 21 in first-trimester singleton pregnancies.","authors":"James Osborne, Chris Cockcroft, Carolyn Williams","doi":"10.1080/01443615.2025.2527111","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Antenatal screening for Trisomy 21 (T21) in the UK is performed primarily in the first trimester. Nuchal Translucency (NT), gestational age, Free β-HCG and PAPP-A are used in combination, creating the 'combined' test. Multivariate Gaussian distribution models then determine the chance of T21 expressed as an odds ratio. This study investigates the use of machine-learning algorithms in the prediction of T21 in first-trimester singleton pregnancies and compares their performance to existing screening models.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 86,354 anonymised, first trimester, singleton pregnancy screening cases, including 211 with T21, were used to train and test machine-learning models using adaptive boosting technology. Test case results were compared with pregnancy outcome data to assess performance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A machine-learning model was able to outperform current multivariate distribution models (McNemar's <i>p</i> = .006, AUC 0.978 vs 0.974). False positive rates were reduced from 3.82% to 2.28% (95% CI: 3.56-4.08 and 2.08-2.48 respectively) and overall screen positive rates were reduced from 4.00% to 2.48% (95% CI: 3.74-4.28 and 2.27-2.70 respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Machine-learning algorithms offer demonstrable improvements to first-trimester singleton T21 screening without major changes to the UK programme. Larger datasets and improved outcome data would likely offer further increases in performance.</p>","PeriodicalId":16627,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology","volume":"45 1","pages":"2527111"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01443615.2025.2527111","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Antenatal screening for Trisomy 21 (T21) in the UK is performed primarily in the first trimester. Nuchal Translucency (NT), gestational age, Free β-HCG and PAPP-A are used in combination, creating the 'combined' test. Multivariate Gaussian distribution models then determine the chance of T21 expressed as an odds ratio. This study investigates the use of machine-learning algorithms in the prediction of T21 in first-trimester singleton pregnancies and compares their performance to existing screening models.

Methods: A total of 86,354 anonymised, first trimester, singleton pregnancy screening cases, including 211 with T21, were used to train and test machine-learning models using adaptive boosting technology. Test case results were compared with pregnancy outcome data to assess performance.

Results: A machine-learning model was able to outperform current multivariate distribution models (McNemar's p = .006, AUC 0.978 vs 0.974). False positive rates were reduced from 3.82% to 2.28% (95% CI: 3.56-4.08 and 2.08-2.48 respectively) and overall screen positive rates were reduced from 4.00% to 2.48% (95% CI: 3.74-4.28 and 2.27-2.70 respectively).

Conclusions: Machine-learning algorithms offer demonstrable improvements to first-trimester singleton T21 screening without major changes to the UK programme. Larger datasets and improved outcome data would likely offer further increases in performance.

一种新的机器学习算法,用于筛查早期单胎妊娠的21三体。
背景:在英国,21三体(T21)的产前筛查主要在妊娠早期进行。颈透性(NT)、胎龄、游离β-HCG和pap - a联合使用,形成“联合”测试。多变量高斯分布模型然后确定T21的机会表示为优势比。本研究探讨了机器学习算法在早期单胎妊娠T21预测中的应用,并将其性能与现有筛查模型进行了比较。方法:采用自适应增强技术对86,354例匿名早期妊娠、单胎妊娠筛查病例(其中211例为T21)进行机器学习模型训练和测试。将测试病例结果与妊娠结局数据进行比较,以评估其表现。结果:机器学习模型能够优于当前的多变量分布模型(McNemar’s p =)。006, AUC 0.978 vs 0.974)。假阳性率从3.82%降至2.28% (95% CI分别为3.56-4.08和2.08-2.48),总体筛查阳性率从4.00%降至2.48% (95% CI分别为3.74-4.28和2.27-2.70)。结论:机器学习算法为早期妊娠单胎T21筛查提供了明显的改进,而英国项目没有重大变化。更大的数据集和改进的结果数据可能会进一步提高性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
7.70%
发文量
398
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology represents an established forum for the entire field of obstetrics and gynaecology, publishing a broad range of original, peer-reviewed papers, from scientific and clinical research to reviews relevant to practice. It also includes occasional supplements on clinical symposia. The journal is read widely by trainees in our specialty and we acknowledge a major role in education in Obstetrics and Gynaecology. Past and present editors have recognized the difficulties that junior doctors encounter in achieving their first publications and spend time advising authors during their initial attempts at submission. The journal continues to attract a world-wide readership thanks to the emphasis on practical applicability and its excellent record of drawing on an international base of authors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信