Efficacy of Dry Needling Combined with Eccentric Exercise Versus Oral and Topical NSAID Treatment in Patients with Tennis Elbow: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

IF 3.3 Q1 INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE
Zacarías Sánchez-Milá, Vanesa Abuín-Porras, Helena Fidalgo-Gómez, Isabel Mínguez-Esteban, Jaime Almazán-Polo, Jorge Velázquez-Saornil
{"title":"Efficacy of Dry Needling Combined with Eccentric Exercise Versus Oral and Topical NSAID Treatment in Patients with Tennis Elbow: A Randomized Controlled Trial.","authors":"Zacarías Sánchez-Milá, Vanesa Abuín-Porras, Helena Fidalgo-Gómez, Isabel Mínguez-Esteban, Jaime Almazán-Polo, Jorge Velázquez-Saornil","doi":"10.1177/2515690X251355017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>ObjectiveThe study aimed to compare the effects of a combined intervention of dry needling and eccentric exercises versus oral and topical NSAID treatment, each combined with eccentric exercises, on pain intensity and hand function in patients with lateral epicondylalgia.DesignA single-blind, randomized controlled trial.MethodsA total of 111 participants with LE were randomly assigned to three groups: Dry needling plus eccentric exercise, Oral treatment plus eccentric exercise, and Topical treatment plus eccentric exercise. Pain intensity was assessed using the Visual Analog Scale and pressure pain threshold at the lateral epicondyle, medial epicondyle, radial styloid, and ulnar styloid. Functional impairment was measured using the HAND10 questionnaire. Statistical analysis included repeated measures ANOVA and post-hoc tests.ResultsAll groups showed significant improvements in pain intensity and function over the 30-day intervention period The DN group achieved the most substantial reduction in pain and the greatest improvement in pressure pain threshold and functional scores, followed by the TopA group. The OralI group demonstrated the least improvement across all measures. Significant differences were found between the three groups,with the dry needling group outperforming both Oral and Topical treatment groups in pain relief and functional outcomes.ConclusionThe combination of dry needling and eccentric exercises was more effective in reducing pain and improving hand function compared to NSAID-based interventions. These findings support the use of dry needling as an adjunct therapy to eccentric exercises for the management of lateral epicondylalgia.<b>Clinical Trials Registry number:</b> NCT05021354.</p>","PeriodicalId":15714,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Evidence-based Integrative Medicine","volume":"30 ","pages":"2515690X251355017"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12254548/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Evidence-based Integrative Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/2515690X251355017","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ObjectiveThe study aimed to compare the effects of a combined intervention of dry needling and eccentric exercises versus oral and topical NSAID treatment, each combined with eccentric exercises, on pain intensity and hand function in patients with lateral epicondylalgia.DesignA single-blind, randomized controlled trial.MethodsA total of 111 participants with LE were randomly assigned to three groups: Dry needling plus eccentric exercise, Oral treatment plus eccentric exercise, and Topical treatment plus eccentric exercise. Pain intensity was assessed using the Visual Analog Scale and pressure pain threshold at the lateral epicondyle, medial epicondyle, radial styloid, and ulnar styloid. Functional impairment was measured using the HAND10 questionnaire. Statistical analysis included repeated measures ANOVA and post-hoc tests.ResultsAll groups showed significant improvements in pain intensity and function over the 30-day intervention period The DN group achieved the most substantial reduction in pain and the greatest improvement in pressure pain threshold and functional scores, followed by the TopA group. The OralI group demonstrated the least improvement across all measures. Significant differences were found between the three groups,with the dry needling group outperforming both Oral and Topical treatment groups in pain relief and functional outcomes.ConclusionThe combination of dry needling and eccentric exercises was more effective in reducing pain and improving hand function compared to NSAID-based interventions. These findings support the use of dry needling as an adjunct therapy to eccentric exercises for the management of lateral epicondylalgia.Clinical Trials Registry number: NCT05021354.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

干针联合偏心运动与口服和局部非甾体抗炎药治疗网球肘患者的疗效:一项随机对照试验。
目的:本研究旨在比较干针和偏心运动联合干预与口服和外用非甾体抗炎药治疗(每种联合偏心运动)对外上髁痛患者疼痛强度和手部功能的影响。设计一项单盲、随机对照试验。方法将111例LE患者随机分为干针加偏心运动组、口服治疗加偏心运动组和局部治疗加偏心运动组。疼痛强度评估采用视觉模拟量表和压力痛阈在外侧上髁,内侧上髁,桡骨茎突和尺侧茎突。使用HAND10问卷测量功能损害。统计分析包括重复测量、方差分析和事后检验。结果在30天的干预期内,各组疼痛强度和功能均有显著改善,DN组疼痛减轻最明显,压痛阈值和功能评分改善最大,TopA组次之。OralI组在所有测量中表现出的改善最小。三组之间存在显著差异,干针组在疼痛缓解和功能结局方面优于口服和局部治疗组。结论与以非甾体抗炎药为基础的干预措施相比,干针联合偏心运动在减轻疼痛和改善手功能方面更有效。这些发现支持使用干针作为偏心运动治疗外侧上髁痛的辅助疗法。临床试验注册号:NCT05021354。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Evidence-based Integrative Medicine
Journal of Evidence-based Integrative Medicine INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE-
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
43
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信