Reliability of the Ichthyosis Scoring System in Individuals With Skin of Color.

IF 11 1区 医学 Q1 DERMATOLOGY
Angela J Luo, Lisa M Arkin, Sarah Asch, Latanya Benjamin, Anna L Bruckner, María Laura Cossio, Lucia Diaz, Evelyn Lilly, Erin F Mathes, Caroline A Nelson, Elena Pope, Sarika Ramachandran, Dawn H Siegel, Joyce M C Teng, Yunshan Xu, Yanhong Deng, Amy S Paller, Keith A Choate
{"title":"Reliability of the Ichthyosis Scoring System in Individuals With Skin of Color.","authors":"Angela J Luo, Lisa M Arkin, Sarah Asch, Latanya Benjamin, Anna L Bruckner, María Laura Cossio, Lucia Diaz, Evelyn Lilly, Erin F Mathes, Caroline A Nelson, Elena Pope, Sarika Ramachandran, Dawn H Siegel, Joyce M C Teng, Yunshan Xu, Yanhong Deng, Amy S Paller, Keith A Choate","doi":"10.1001/jamadermatol.2025.1965","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>The Ichthyosis Scoring System (ISS) is a reliable instrument for assessing ichthyosis severity. The ISS's performance in individuals with skin of color (ie, Fitzpatrick IV-VI skin types) remains unknown because it was initially assessed in individuals with Fitzpatrick I to III skin types.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the reliability of the ISS in individuals with Fitzpatrick IV to VI skin types.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>In this cross-sectional study, 14 dermatologists used the ISS to rate 94 test photographs, 47 from individuals with Fitzpatrick I to III skin types and 47 from individuals with Fitzpatrick IV to VI skin types. The professional photographs were obtained from the National Registry for Ichthyosis and Related Disorders, which enrolls participants with ichthyosis from referral centers, patient advocacy groups, and self-referral worldwide. Test photographs represented individuals of all phototypes with ichthyosis of all severities. Due to limited comprehensive, high-quality photography among individuals with Fitzpatrick IV to VI skin types, 4 body sites were chosen: upper back, legs, upper arm, and dorsal feet. From August to December 2023, dermatologists independently scored the same test photographs and were blinded to photographic groupings. Data were analyzed in March 2024.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>Interrater reliabilities were determined using interrater intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) using the two-way random effects model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 61 individuals with ichthyosis represented in the 94 photographs, 28 (46%) were younger than 18 years and 33 (54%) were 18 years and older; 32 (52%) were female and 29 (48%) were male; and 1 (2%) was American Indian, 16 (26%) were Black, 6 (10%) were Hispanic, 1 (2%) was Pacific Islander, 5 (8%) were South Asian, 31 (51%) were White, and 1 (2%) was White and Hispanic. For individuals with Fitzpatrick I to III skin types, scale and erythema ICCs ranged from 0.97 (95% CI, 0.93-0.99) to 0.99 (95% CI, 0.98-1.00) and 0.91 (95% CI, 0.79-0.97) to 0.95 (95% CI, 0.89-0.99), respectively. For individuals with Fitzpatrick IV to VI skin types, scale and erythema ICCs ranged from 0.97 (95% CI, 0.93-0.99) to 0.99 (95% CI, 0.98-1.00) and 0.90 (95% CI, 0.80-0.96) to 0.94 (95% CI, 0.86-0.98), respectively. The overlap of ICC confidence intervals demonstrates ISS reliability across phototypes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>This cross-sectional study shows that the ISS can be applied across phototypes to measure ichthyosis severity. Further studies using full-body photographs would further bolster the ISS's reliability to assess global ichthyosis severity. These findings set the stage for increasing diversity in ichthyosis clinical trials.</p>","PeriodicalId":14734,"journal":{"name":"JAMA dermatology","volume":" ","pages":"849-854"},"PeriodicalIF":11.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12242821/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAMA dermatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamadermatol.2025.1965","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Importance: The Ichthyosis Scoring System (ISS) is a reliable instrument for assessing ichthyosis severity. The ISS's performance in individuals with skin of color (ie, Fitzpatrick IV-VI skin types) remains unknown because it was initially assessed in individuals with Fitzpatrick I to III skin types.

Objective: To assess the reliability of the ISS in individuals with Fitzpatrick IV to VI skin types.

Design, setting, and participants: In this cross-sectional study, 14 dermatologists used the ISS to rate 94 test photographs, 47 from individuals with Fitzpatrick I to III skin types and 47 from individuals with Fitzpatrick IV to VI skin types. The professional photographs were obtained from the National Registry for Ichthyosis and Related Disorders, which enrolls participants with ichthyosis from referral centers, patient advocacy groups, and self-referral worldwide. Test photographs represented individuals of all phototypes with ichthyosis of all severities. Due to limited comprehensive, high-quality photography among individuals with Fitzpatrick IV to VI skin types, 4 body sites were chosen: upper back, legs, upper arm, and dorsal feet. From August to December 2023, dermatologists independently scored the same test photographs and were blinded to photographic groupings. Data were analyzed in March 2024.

Main outcomes and measures: Interrater reliabilities were determined using interrater intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) using the two-way random effects model.

Results: Of the 61 individuals with ichthyosis represented in the 94 photographs, 28 (46%) were younger than 18 years and 33 (54%) were 18 years and older; 32 (52%) were female and 29 (48%) were male; and 1 (2%) was American Indian, 16 (26%) were Black, 6 (10%) were Hispanic, 1 (2%) was Pacific Islander, 5 (8%) were South Asian, 31 (51%) were White, and 1 (2%) was White and Hispanic. For individuals with Fitzpatrick I to III skin types, scale and erythema ICCs ranged from 0.97 (95% CI, 0.93-0.99) to 0.99 (95% CI, 0.98-1.00) and 0.91 (95% CI, 0.79-0.97) to 0.95 (95% CI, 0.89-0.99), respectively. For individuals with Fitzpatrick IV to VI skin types, scale and erythema ICCs ranged from 0.97 (95% CI, 0.93-0.99) to 0.99 (95% CI, 0.98-1.00) and 0.90 (95% CI, 0.80-0.96) to 0.94 (95% CI, 0.86-0.98), respectively. The overlap of ICC confidence intervals demonstrates ISS reliability across phototypes.

Conclusions and relevance: This cross-sectional study shows that the ISS can be applied across phototypes to measure ichthyosis severity. Further studies using full-body photographs would further bolster the ISS's reliability to assess global ichthyosis severity. These findings set the stage for increasing diversity in ichthyosis clinical trials.

鱼鳞病评分系统在有色人种中的可靠性。
重要性:鱼鳞病评分系统(ISS)是评估鱼鳞病严重程度的可靠工具。ISS在有色皮肤(即Fitzpatrick IV-VI皮肤类型)中的表现尚不清楚,因为它最初是在Fitzpatrick I - III皮肤类型的个体中进行评估的。目的:评估菲茨帕特里克IV至VI型皮肤患者ISS的可靠性。设计、设置和参与者:在这项横断面研究中,14名皮肤科医生使用ISS对94张测试照片进行评分,其中47张来自菲茨帕特里克I至III皮肤类型的个体,47张来自菲茨帕特里克IV至VI皮肤类型的个体。专业照片来自国家鱼鳞病及相关疾病登记处,该登记处登记了来自转诊中心、患者倡导团体和世界各地自我转诊的鱼鳞病患者。测试照片代表了所有严重程度的鱼鳞病的所有光型个体。由于Fitzpatrick IV至VI皮肤类型个体的全面、高质量摄影有限,因此选择了4个身体部位:上背部、腿部、上臂和足背。从2023年8月到12月,皮肤科医生独立对相同的测试照片进行评分,并对照片分组进行盲检。数据分析于2024年3月进行。主要结果和测量方法:采用双向随机效应模型,采用组内相关系数(ICCs)确定组间信度。结果:94张照片中61例鱼鳞病患者中,18岁以下28例(46%),18岁及以上33例(54%);女性32例(52%),男性29例(48%);美洲印第安人1人(2%),黑人16人(26%),西班牙裔6人(10%),太平洋岛民1人(2%),南亚人5人(8%),白人31人(51%),白人和西班牙裔1人(2%)。对于Fitzpatrick I至III皮肤类型的个体,鳞片和红斑ICCs分别为0.97 (95% CI, 0.93-0.99)至0.99 (95% CI, 0.98-1.00)和0.91 (95% CI, 0.79-0.97)至0.95 (95% CI, 0.89-0.99)。对于Fitzpatrick IV至VI皮肤类型的个体,鳞片和红斑ICCs的范围分别为0.97 (95% CI, 0.93-0.99)至0.99 (95% CI, 0.98-1.00)和0.90 (95% CI, 0.80-0.96)至0.94 (95% CI, 0.86-0.98)。ICC置信区间的重叠证明了ISS在不同照片类型中的可靠性。结论和相关性:这项横断面研究表明,ISS可以应用于不同的光型来测量鱼鳞病的严重程度。使用全身照片的进一步研究将进一步增强国际空间站评估全球鱼鳞病严重程度的可靠性。这些发现为增加鱼鳞病临床试验的多样性奠定了基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JAMA dermatology
JAMA dermatology DERMATOLOGY-
CiteScore
14.10
自引率
5.50%
发文量
300
期刊介绍: JAMA Dermatology is an international peer-reviewed journal that has been in continuous publication since 1882. It began publication by the American Medical Association in 1920 as Archives of Dermatology and Syphilology. The journal publishes material that helps in the development and testing of the effectiveness of diagnosis and treatment in medical and surgical dermatology, pediatric and geriatric dermatology, and oncologic and aesthetic dermatologic surgery. JAMA Dermatology is a member of the JAMA Network, a consortium of peer-reviewed, general medical and specialty publications. It is published online weekly, every Wednesday, and in 12 print/online issues a year. The mission of the journal is to elevate the art and science of health and diseases of skin, hair, nails, and mucous membranes, and their treatment, with the aim of enabling dermatologists to deliver evidence-based, high-value medical and surgical dermatologic care. The journal publishes a broad range of innovative studies and trials that shift research and clinical practice paradigms, expand the understanding of the burden of dermatologic diseases and key outcomes, improve the practice of dermatology, and ensure equitable care to all patients. It also features research and opinion examining ethical, moral, socioeconomic, educational, and political issues relevant to dermatologists, aiming to enable ongoing improvement to the workforce, scope of practice, and the training of future dermatologists. JAMA Dermatology aims to be a leader in developing initiatives to improve diversity, equity, and inclusion within the specialty and within dermatology medical publishing.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信