3-year revision rates of left vs right cephalomedullary nails with a helical blade design.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Linda Kelly, Darren Moloney, Denis Collins
{"title":"3-year revision rates of left vs right cephalomedullary nails with a helical blade design.","authors":"Linda Kelly, Darren Moloney, Denis Collins","doi":"10.1007/s11845-025-04000-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Intramedullary (IM) femoral nailing in the form of cephalomedullary (CM) nailing is a common treatment of intertrochanteric femoral fractures. Previous literature has demonstrated higher revision rates of left intertrochanteric fractures. Helical blade constructs offer a theoretical advantage over a screw design.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The objective of this study is to examine 3 year revision rates for right vs left CM nails with helical blade head screw. No current studies exist which compare revision rates in left versus right IM nails over this defined time period.</p><p><strong>Study design and methods: </strong>Patients who sustained intertrochanteric femoral fracture subsequently treated by CM nailing between July 2021 and December 2022 were retrospectively identified from a database of orthopaedic patients. Patients were stratified based on left-sided or right-sided fracture. Criteria for inclusion were anterograde femoral nails, performed for Intertrochanteric hip fractures. Exclusion criteria included revision nails, retrograde nails, diaphyseal and subtrochanteric fractures, reverse oblique fracture patterns and prophylactic nails. The primary outcome was 3 year revision rate. Relevant frequency statistics were generated for each cohort with odds ratios comparing revision rates between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>n = 104 patients were included in the final sample, comprising n = 48 left and n = 56 right sided intertrochanteric fractures who underwent CM nailing. n = 4 (3.8%) TFNAs underwent subsequent surgical revision. Incidence of revision was higher in patients undergoing left IM nailing Left: 3/48, 0.063, Right: 1/56, 0.018, Odds Ratio: 3.667, 95% Confidence Interval: 0.37 - 36.47, p = 0.268).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A greater proportion of patients who sustained a left sided intertrochanteric fracture and were surgically treated with CM nailing underwent revision surgery within 3 years of initial surgery compared to right sided CM nails.</p>","PeriodicalId":14507,"journal":{"name":"Irish Journal of Medical Science","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Irish Journal of Medical Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11845-025-04000-8","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Intramedullary (IM) femoral nailing in the form of cephalomedullary (CM) nailing is a common treatment of intertrochanteric femoral fractures. Previous literature has demonstrated higher revision rates of left intertrochanteric fractures. Helical blade constructs offer a theoretical advantage over a screw design.

Objectives: The objective of this study is to examine 3 year revision rates for right vs left CM nails with helical blade head screw. No current studies exist which compare revision rates in left versus right IM nails over this defined time period.

Study design and methods: Patients who sustained intertrochanteric femoral fracture subsequently treated by CM nailing between July 2021 and December 2022 were retrospectively identified from a database of orthopaedic patients. Patients were stratified based on left-sided or right-sided fracture. Criteria for inclusion were anterograde femoral nails, performed for Intertrochanteric hip fractures. Exclusion criteria included revision nails, retrograde nails, diaphyseal and subtrochanteric fractures, reverse oblique fracture patterns and prophylactic nails. The primary outcome was 3 year revision rate. Relevant frequency statistics were generated for each cohort with odds ratios comparing revision rates between the two groups.

Results: n = 104 patients were included in the final sample, comprising n = 48 left and n = 56 right sided intertrochanteric fractures who underwent CM nailing. n = 4 (3.8%) TFNAs underwent subsequent surgical revision. Incidence of revision was higher in patients undergoing left IM nailing Left: 3/48, 0.063, Right: 1/56, 0.018, Odds Ratio: 3.667, 95% Confidence Interval: 0.37 - 36.47, p = 0.268).

Conclusion: A greater proportion of patients who sustained a left sided intertrochanteric fracture and were surgically treated with CM nailing underwent revision surgery within 3 years of initial surgery compared to right sided CM nails.

螺旋刀片设计的左、右头髓钉3年翻修率。
简介:髓内(IM)股髓内钉形式的头髓内(CM)钉是股骨粗隆间骨折的常用治疗方法。先前的文献表明,左侧粗隆间骨折的翻修率较高。螺旋叶片结构在理论上比螺旋设计有优势。目的:本研究的目的是检查3年改良率右与左CM钉螺旋刃头螺钉。目前还没有研究在这段时间内比较左钉和右钉的修复率。研究设计和方法:从骨科患者数据库中回顾性筛选2021年7月至2022年12月期间接受CM钉治疗的持续股骨粗隆间骨折患者。患者根据左侧或右侧骨折进行分层。纳入标准为股骨顺行钉,用于治疗股骨粗隆间骨折。排除标准包括翻修钉、逆行钉、骨干和粗隆下骨折、反向斜向骨折模式和预防性钉。主要终点为3年修正率。对每个队列进行相关的频率统计,并使用比值比比较两组之间的修订率。结果:最终样本n = 104例,其中左侧粗隆间骨折n = 48例,右侧粗隆间骨折n = 56例,均行CM内钉治疗。n = 4 (3.8%) tfna随后接受了手术翻修。左髓内钉患者翻修发生率较高(左:3/48,0.063,右:1/56,0.018,优势比:3.667,95%可信区间:0.37 ~ 36.47,p = 0.268)。结论:与右侧CM钉相比,左侧粗隆间骨折手术治疗的CM钉患者在初始手术3年内接受翻修手术的比例更大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Irish Journal of Medical Science
Irish Journal of Medical Science 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
4.80%
发文量
357
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Irish Journal of Medical Science is the official organ of the Royal Academy of Medicine in Ireland. Established in 1832, this quarterly journal is a contribution to medical science and an ideal forum for the younger medical/scientific professional to enter world literature and an ideal launching platform now, as in the past, for many a young research worker. The primary role of both the Academy and IJMS is that of providing a forum for the exchange of scientific information and to promote academic discussion, so essential to scientific progress.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信