E-PASS Scoring System in Predicting Postoperative Complications After Penile Prosthesis Implantation.

IF 1.8 3区 医学 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Kursat Kucuker, Alper Simsek, Mesut Berkan Duran, Mehmet Kirdar, Burak Saglam, Oguz Celik, Caner Ozdemir, Yusuf Ozlulerden, Sinan Celen
{"title":"E-PASS Scoring System in Predicting Postoperative Complications After Penile Prosthesis Implantation.","authors":"Kursat Kucuker, Alper Simsek, Mesut Berkan Duran, Mehmet Kirdar, Burak Saglam, Oguz Celik, Caner Ozdemir, Yusuf Ozlulerden, Sinan Celen","doi":"10.1111/iju.70165","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Complications related to penile prosthesis implantation surgery (PPI) can be categorized as infectious, non-infectious organ/tissue damage, device failure, and patient/partner dissatisfaction. However, no scoring system has been established to assess both preoperative physical status and intraoperative risk factors. The Estimation of Physiologic Ability and Surgical Stress (E-PASS) score was originally developed to estimate postoperative complication risk in gastrointestinal surgeries. It incorporates age, severe cardiac/pulmonary disease, diabetes mellitus, performance status index, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification, blood loss, body weight, operative time, and skin incision length. This study aims to evaluate the feasibility of the E-PASS scoring system in predicting postoperative complications following PPI.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this single-center retrospective study, data of 56 patients who underwent PPI between 2015 and 2024 were analyzed. Demographics, preoperative physical condition parameters, and intraoperative risk factors were recorded. E-PASS score and sub-scores were calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Postoperative complications occurred in 17 patients (30.4%). Patients with complications had higher performance scores, ASA scores, prior pelvic/penile/urethral surgeries, prior PPI history, and higher E-PASS scores (preoperative risk score, surgical stress score, and comprehensive risk score [CRS]). A CRS cut-off value of -0.1238 predicted complications (AUC = 0.75; 95% CI 0.62-0.88; p < 0.003). CRS above the cut-off was associated with a 16.2-fold increase in complication risk.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The E-PASS scoring system appears to be a reliable tool for predicting postoperative complications in patients undergoing PPI by incorporating both preoperative physical condition and intraoperative risk factors.</p>","PeriodicalId":14323,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Urology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Urology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/iju.70165","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Complications related to penile prosthesis implantation surgery (PPI) can be categorized as infectious, non-infectious organ/tissue damage, device failure, and patient/partner dissatisfaction. However, no scoring system has been established to assess both preoperative physical status and intraoperative risk factors. The Estimation of Physiologic Ability and Surgical Stress (E-PASS) score was originally developed to estimate postoperative complication risk in gastrointestinal surgeries. It incorporates age, severe cardiac/pulmonary disease, diabetes mellitus, performance status index, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification, blood loss, body weight, operative time, and skin incision length. This study aims to evaluate the feasibility of the E-PASS scoring system in predicting postoperative complications following PPI.

Methods: In this single-center retrospective study, data of 56 patients who underwent PPI between 2015 and 2024 were analyzed. Demographics, preoperative physical condition parameters, and intraoperative risk factors were recorded. E-PASS score and sub-scores were calculated.

Results: Postoperative complications occurred in 17 patients (30.4%). Patients with complications had higher performance scores, ASA scores, prior pelvic/penile/urethral surgeries, prior PPI history, and higher E-PASS scores (preoperative risk score, surgical stress score, and comprehensive risk score [CRS]). A CRS cut-off value of -0.1238 predicted complications (AUC = 0.75; 95% CI 0.62-0.88; p < 0.003). CRS above the cut-off was associated with a 16.2-fold increase in complication risk.

Conclusions: The E-PASS scoring system appears to be a reliable tool for predicting postoperative complications in patients undergoing PPI by incorporating both preoperative physical condition and intraoperative risk factors.

E-PASS评分系统在阴茎假体植入术后并发症预测中的应用。
目的:与阴茎假体植入手术(PPI)相关的并发症可分为感染性、非感染性器官/组织损伤、器械失效和患者/伴侣不满。然而,尚未建立评分系统来评估术前身体状况和术中危险因素。生理能力和手术压力评估(E-PASS)评分最初用于评估胃肠道手术术后并发症的风险。它包括年龄、严重心肺疾病、糖尿病、工作状态指数、美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)分类、出血量、体重、手术时间和皮肤切口长度。本研究旨在评估E-PASS评分系统预测PPI术后并发症的可行性。方法:在这项单中心回顾性研究中,分析了2015年至2024年间56例接受PPI治疗的患者的数据。记录人口统计学、术前身体状况参数和术中危险因素。计算E-PASS分数和分分数。结果:术后并发症17例(30.4%)。有并发症的患者表现评分、ASA评分、既往盆腔/阴茎/尿道手术、既往PPI史以及E-PASS评分(术前风险评分、手术应激评分和综合风险评分[CRS])均较高。CRS截止值-0.1238预测并发症(AUC = 0.75;95% ci 0.62-0.88;结论:E-PASS评分系统结合术前身体状况和术中危险因素,是预测PPI患者术后并发症的可靠工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Urology
International Journal of Urology 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
11.50%
发文量
340
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: International Journal of Urology is the official English language journal of the Japanese Urological Association, publishing articles of scientific excellence in urology. Submissions of papers from all countries are considered for publication. All manuscripts are subject to peer review and are judged on the basis of their contribution of original data and ideas or interpretation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信