Does prior mesh infection matter? Clinical outcomes of patients undergoing complex abdominal wall reconstruction after infected mesh explantation.

IF 2.4 2区 医学 Q1 SURGERY
Hernia Pub Date : 2025-07-09 DOI:10.1007/s10029-025-03405-9
Daphne Remulla, Brianna L Slatnick, Kimberly P Woo, William C Bennett, Alvaro Carvalho, Cammy Tang, Kimberly S Miles, Li-Ching Huang, Benjamin T Miller, Lucas R Beffa, David M Krpata, Clayton C Petro, Ajita S Prabhu, Michael J Rosen
{"title":"Does prior mesh infection matter? Clinical outcomes of patients undergoing complex abdominal wall reconstruction after infected mesh explantation.","authors":"Daphne Remulla, Brianna L Slatnick, Kimberly P Woo, William C Bennett, Alvaro Carvalho, Cammy Tang, Kimberly S Miles, Li-Ching Huang, Benjamin T Miller, Lucas R Beffa, David M Krpata, Clayton C Petro, Ajita S Prabhu, Michael J Rosen","doi":"10.1007/s10029-025-03405-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>While mesh infection after ventral hernia repair often requires explantation and subsequent repair, the association between prior mesh infection with outcomes following complex abdominal wall reconstruction remains poorly understood.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A two-stage propensity score-matched analysis was performed using the Abdominal Core Health Quality Collaborative database. Patients undergoing clean, elective, open ventral hernia repair with prior mesh infections were compared with those with no prior wound morbidity and non-mesh-related surgical site infections (SSIs). All patients underwent elective open ventral hernia repair with transversus abdominis release (TAR) and retromuscular synthetic mesh placement.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After propensity score matching, 205 patients with prior mesh infection were matched to 205 patients with prior non-mesh-related SSI and to 548 patients with no prior wound morbidity. Patients with a prior mesh infection experienced significantly higher rates of 30-day surgical site occurrences (SSO) (24.9% vs. 14.1%; p < 0.001) and surgical site occurrences requiring procedural intervention (14.1% vs. 7.7%; p = 0.007), compared with those with no prior wound morbidity. Compared with those with prior non-mesh-related SSIs, patients with a prior mesh infection also had a higher rate of SSO (25% vs. 14%; p = 0.004) and a higher proportion of deep SSIs (65% vs. 20%; p = 0.004). Despite these differences, mesh excision rates were low across all groups (0.1-0.2%). Patients with prior mesh infection reported significantly worse quality of life at baseline (median HerQLes: 22 vs. 32; p = 0.008) and worse pain scores at 30 days (median PROMIS 3 A: 52 vs. 46; p = 0.007). Reoperation and hernia recurrence rates were similar between groups throughout the five-year follow-up period.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Prior mesh infection is associated with increased short-term wound morbidity following complex abdominal wall reconstruction, despite similar long-term hernia recurrence rates and low rates of mesh excision. While transversus abdominis release (TAR) with retromuscular mesh placement may mitigate the risk of repeated mesh infection and explantation, prior mesh infections impact patient outcomes well beyond the immediate postoperative period. These findings can help guide informed discussion and set appropriate patient expectations.</p>","PeriodicalId":13168,"journal":{"name":"Hernia","volume":"29 1","pages":"226"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hernia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-025-03405-9","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: While mesh infection after ventral hernia repair often requires explantation and subsequent repair, the association between prior mesh infection with outcomes following complex abdominal wall reconstruction remains poorly understood.

Methods: A two-stage propensity score-matched analysis was performed using the Abdominal Core Health Quality Collaborative database. Patients undergoing clean, elective, open ventral hernia repair with prior mesh infections were compared with those with no prior wound morbidity and non-mesh-related surgical site infections (SSIs). All patients underwent elective open ventral hernia repair with transversus abdominis release (TAR) and retromuscular synthetic mesh placement.

Results: After propensity score matching, 205 patients with prior mesh infection were matched to 205 patients with prior non-mesh-related SSI and to 548 patients with no prior wound morbidity. Patients with a prior mesh infection experienced significantly higher rates of 30-day surgical site occurrences (SSO) (24.9% vs. 14.1%; p < 0.001) and surgical site occurrences requiring procedural intervention (14.1% vs. 7.7%; p = 0.007), compared with those with no prior wound morbidity. Compared with those with prior non-mesh-related SSIs, patients with a prior mesh infection also had a higher rate of SSO (25% vs. 14%; p = 0.004) and a higher proportion of deep SSIs (65% vs. 20%; p = 0.004). Despite these differences, mesh excision rates were low across all groups (0.1-0.2%). Patients with prior mesh infection reported significantly worse quality of life at baseline (median HerQLes: 22 vs. 32; p = 0.008) and worse pain scores at 30 days (median PROMIS 3 A: 52 vs. 46; p = 0.007). Reoperation and hernia recurrence rates were similar between groups throughout the five-year follow-up period.

Conclusions: Prior mesh infection is associated with increased short-term wound morbidity following complex abdominal wall reconstruction, despite similar long-term hernia recurrence rates and low rates of mesh excision. While transversus abdominis release (TAR) with retromuscular mesh placement may mitigate the risk of repeated mesh infection and explantation, prior mesh infections impact patient outcomes well beyond the immediate postoperative period. These findings can help guide informed discussion and set appropriate patient expectations.

先前的补片感染重要吗?感染补片植入术后复杂腹壁重建的临床效果。
背景:虽然腹疝修补后补片感染通常需要取出并随后修复,但先前补片感染与复杂腹壁重建后结果之间的关系仍然知之甚少。方法:使用腹部核心健康质量协作数据库进行两阶段倾向评分匹配分析。接受清洁、选择性、开放式腹疝修补术且既往有补片感染的患者与既往无伤口发病率和非补片相关手术部位感染(ssi)的患者进行比较。所有患者均行选择性腹疝切开修补术,包括经腹释放术(TAR)和肌后合成补片置入。结果:经过倾向评分匹配,205例既往补片感染患者与205例既往非补片相关SSI患者和548例既往无伤口发病率患者进行匹配。先前有补片感染的患者30天手术部位发生率(SSO)明显更高(24.9% vs 14.1%;结论:尽管长期疝复发率和低补片切除率相似,但在复杂腹壁重建后,既往补片感染与短期伤口发病率增加有关。虽然经腹释放(TAR)与肌肉后补片放置可以降低重复补片感染和取出的风险,但先前的补片感染对患者预后的影响远远超出了术后的直接时间。这些发现可以帮助指导知情的讨论并设定适当的患者期望。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Hernia
Hernia SURGERY-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
26.10%
发文量
171
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Hernia was founded in 1997 by Jean P. Chevrel with the purpose of promoting clinical studies and basic research as they apply to groin hernias and the abdominal wall . Since that time, a true revolution in the field of hernia studies has transformed the field from a ”simple” disease to one that is very specialized. While the majority of surgeries for primary inguinal and abdominal wall hernia are performed in hospitals worldwide, complex situations such as multi recurrences, complications, abdominal wall reconstructions and others are being studied and treated in specialist centers. As a result, major institutions and societies are creating specific parameters and criteria to better address the complexities of hernia surgery. Hernia is a journal written by surgeons who have made abdominal wall surgery their specific field of interest, but we will consider publishing content from any surgeon who wishes to improve the science of this field. The Journal aims to ensure that hernia surgery is safer and easier for surgeons as well as patients, and provides a forum to all surgeons in the exchange of new ideas, results, and important research that is the basis of professional activity.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信