Neoadjuvant triple-modality therapy with immune checkpoint blockade, anti-angiogenesis, and chemotherapy enhances pathologic response and survival in locally advanced and metastatic colorectal cancer: a multicenter cohort study.

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Heng Wang, Junwei Zheng, Jun Pan, Shuliang Li, Bingbing Ren, Pei Wang, Bo Mo
{"title":"Neoadjuvant triple-modality therapy with immune checkpoint blockade, anti-angiogenesis, and chemotherapy enhances pathologic response and survival in locally advanced and metastatic colorectal cancer: a multicenter cohort study.","authors":"Heng Wang, Junwei Zheng, Jun Pan, Shuliang Li, Bingbing Ren, Pei Wang, Bo Mo","doi":"10.1007/s00384-025-04945-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The current study seeks to investigate the clinical outcomes of combining immune checkpoint blockade, anti-angiogenesis, and chemotherapy in neoadjuvant treatment for individuals diagnosed with locally advanced (high-risk Stage III or initially unresectable Stage III) or resectable/unresectable Stage IV colorectal cancer, including metastatic cases.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 120 individuals diagnosed with advanced colorectal cancer (stage III: n = 65; stage IV: n = 55; metastatic sites: liver n = 30, lung n = 15, peritoneal n = 10) were enrolled at three hospitals between February 2021 and December 2022. All patients underwent biopsy and pathology confirmation. Based on the treatment plan, patients were categorized into a control group (n = 60) receiving standard FOLFOX/FOLFIRI chemotherapy and an experimental group (n = 60) receiving a combination of pembrolizumab (200 mg IV q3w), bevacizumab (5 mg/kg IV q2w), and FOLFOX regimen (oxaliplatin 85 mg/m<sup>2</sup>, leucovorin 400 mg/m<sup>2</sup>, 5-fluorouracil 400 mg/m<sup>2</sup> bolus followed by 2400 mg/m<sup>2</sup> infusion over 46 h). VEGF and bFGF levels were assessed using ELISA before and after treatment. Flow cytometry analyzed CD4 + levels and the CD4 + /CD8 + ratio, while serum tumor markers Cancer antigen 199 (CA 19-9) and Carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) were measured by chemiluminescence immunoassay. Therapeutic outcomes, median OS, and median PFS were compared between the two groups using Kaplan-Meier analysis and log-rank tests (normality confirmed via Shapiro-Wilk test).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After a 6-week treatment period, the experimental group showed a more significant reduction in VEGF (Δ = 132.0 pg/mL vs. 57.9 pg/mL) and bFGF (Δ = 51.4 pg/mL vs. 20.1 pg/mL) compared to the control group (P < 0.001). The experimental group demonstrated higher CD4 + /CD8 + ratios post-treatment (1.65 vs. 1.23, P < 0.01) and greater reductions in CA 19-9 (Δ = 42.5 U/mL vs. 23.8 U/mL) and CEA (Δ = 12.6 ng/mL vs. 6.9 ng/mL) (P < 0.01). Response rates (CR + PR: 40.0% (Experimental: 8.3% CR + 31.7% PR) vs. 18.4% (Control: 1.7% CR + 16.7% PR); DCR: 46.7% vs. 25.0%) and survival outcomes (median OS: 32.26 vs. 28.55 months; median PFS: 6.37 vs. 4.58 months) were superior in the experimental group (P < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Combining neoadjuvant therapy with immune checkpoint blockade, anti-angiogenesis, and chemotherapy significantly improves tumor downstaging (as evidenced by pathologic complete response rates of 18% in the experimental group vs. 5% in the control group among resected patients) and survival outcomes, presenting a promising therapeutic approach for locally advanced and oligometastatic colorectal cancer.</p>","PeriodicalId":13789,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Colorectal Disease","volume":"40 1","pages":"154"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12241296/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Colorectal Disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-025-04945-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The current study seeks to investigate the clinical outcomes of combining immune checkpoint blockade, anti-angiogenesis, and chemotherapy in neoadjuvant treatment for individuals diagnosed with locally advanced (high-risk Stage III or initially unresectable Stage III) or resectable/unresectable Stage IV colorectal cancer, including metastatic cases.

Methods: A total of 120 individuals diagnosed with advanced colorectal cancer (stage III: n = 65; stage IV: n = 55; metastatic sites: liver n = 30, lung n = 15, peritoneal n = 10) were enrolled at three hospitals between February 2021 and December 2022. All patients underwent biopsy and pathology confirmation. Based on the treatment plan, patients were categorized into a control group (n = 60) receiving standard FOLFOX/FOLFIRI chemotherapy and an experimental group (n = 60) receiving a combination of pembrolizumab (200 mg IV q3w), bevacizumab (5 mg/kg IV q2w), and FOLFOX regimen (oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2, leucovorin 400 mg/m2, 5-fluorouracil 400 mg/m2 bolus followed by 2400 mg/m2 infusion over 46 h). VEGF and bFGF levels were assessed using ELISA before and after treatment. Flow cytometry analyzed CD4 + levels and the CD4 + /CD8 + ratio, while serum tumor markers Cancer antigen 199 (CA 19-9) and Carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) were measured by chemiluminescence immunoassay. Therapeutic outcomes, median OS, and median PFS were compared between the two groups using Kaplan-Meier analysis and log-rank tests (normality confirmed via Shapiro-Wilk test).

Results: After a 6-week treatment period, the experimental group showed a more significant reduction in VEGF (Δ = 132.0 pg/mL vs. 57.9 pg/mL) and bFGF (Δ = 51.4 pg/mL vs. 20.1 pg/mL) compared to the control group (P < 0.001). The experimental group demonstrated higher CD4 + /CD8 + ratios post-treatment (1.65 vs. 1.23, P < 0.01) and greater reductions in CA 19-9 (Δ = 42.5 U/mL vs. 23.8 U/mL) and CEA (Δ = 12.6 ng/mL vs. 6.9 ng/mL) (P < 0.01). Response rates (CR + PR: 40.0% (Experimental: 8.3% CR + 31.7% PR) vs. 18.4% (Control: 1.7% CR + 16.7% PR); DCR: 46.7% vs. 25.0%) and survival outcomes (median OS: 32.26 vs. 28.55 months; median PFS: 6.37 vs. 4.58 months) were superior in the experimental group (P < 0.05).

Conclusion: Combining neoadjuvant therapy with immune checkpoint blockade, anti-angiogenesis, and chemotherapy significantly improves tumor downstaging (as evidenced by pathologic complete response rates of 18% in the experimental group vs. 5% in the control group among resected patients) and survival outcomes, presenting a promising therapeutic approach for locally advanced and oligometastatic colorectal cancer.

一项多中心队列研究:免疫检查点阻断、抗血管生成和化疗的新辅助三重模式治疗可提高局部晚期和转移性结直肠癌的病理反应和生存率。
目的:本研究旨在探讨联合免疫检查点阻断、抗血管生成和化疗在局部晚期(高风险III期或最初不可切除的III期)或可切除/不可切除的IV期结直肠癌(包括转移病例)患者的新辅助治疗中的临床结果。方法:共120例晚期结直肠癌患者(III期:n = 65;IV期:n = 55;转移部位:肝n = 30,肺n = 15,腹膜n = 10)于2021年2月至2022年12月在三家医院登记。所有患者均行活检和病理证实。根据治疗方案,将患者分为对照组(n = 60)和实验组(n = 60),对照组接受标准FOLFOX/FOLFIRI化疗,实验组接受派姆单抗(200mg IV q3w)、贝伐单抗(5mg /kg IV q2w)和FOLFOX方案(奥沙利铂85mg /m2,亚叶酸钙400mg /m2, 5-氟尿嘧啶400mg /m2,随后2400mg /m2输注,超过46 h)联合治疗。采用ELISA法检测治疗前后VEGF、bFGF水平。流式细胞术检测CD4 +水平和CD4 + /CD8 +比值,化学发光免疫法检测血清肿瘤标志物癌抗原199 (CA 19-9)和癌胚抗原(CEA)。使用Kaplan-Meier分析和log-rank检验比较两组的治疗结果、中位OS和中位PFS(通过Shapiro-Wilk检验证实正态性)。结果:治疗6周后,实验组VEGF (Δ = 132.0 pg/mL vs. 57.9 pg/mL)和bFGF (Δ = 51.4 pg/mL vs. 20.1 pg/mL)较对照组明显降低(P将新辅助治疗与免疫检查点阻断、抗血管生成和化疗相结合,可显著改善肿瘤的降期(实验组的病理完全缓解率为18%,对照组为5%)和生存结果,为局部晚期和少转移性结直肠癌提供了一种有希望的治疗方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
3.60%
发文量
206
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Colorectal Disease, Clinical and Molecular Gastroenterology and Surgery aims to publish novel and state-of-the-art papers which deal with the physiology and pathophysiology of diseases involving the entire gastrointestinal tract. In addition to original research articles, the following categories will be included: reviews (usually commissioned but may also be submitted), case reports, letters to the editor, and protocols on clinical studies. The journal offers its readers an interdisciplinary forum for clinical science and molecular research related to gastrointestinal disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信