Patient Satisfaction and Oral Health-Related Quality of Life of Quadrilateral Bar versus Bilateral Linear Bar for Mandibular Implant Overdenture: Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.

IF 2.1 Q1 Dentistry
Heba Wageh Abozaed
{"title":"Patient Satisfaction and Oral Health-Related Quality of Life of Quadrilateral Bar versus Bilateral Linear Bar for Mandibular Implant Overdenture: Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.","authors":"Heba Wageh Abozaed","doi":"10.1055/s-0045-1809912","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study aimed to evaluate four implant complete mandibular overdentures retained with different bar designs regarding patient satisfaction and oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL).Twenty participants were selected for this study. Each participant received four implants in the mandibular canine and first molar regions. All patients were divided into two equal groups based on their bar designs: quadrilateral (group I) and bilateral linear (group II). A visual analog scale (VAS) was used to quantify patient satisfaction, and OHRQoL was determined using the Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP-14). Three months later, the VAS and OHIP-14 questions were evaluated.For properly distributed data, continuous variables were shown as mean ± standard deviation. The Mann-Whitney <i>U</i> test was used to compare the two groups. The significance criterion is set at the 5% level. When <i>p</i> < 0.05, the results were deemed significant.Patient satisfaction differs significantly between the two groups, as the quadrilateral bar designs enhance denture support and retention (<i>p</i> = 0.034*) and biting or chewing food (<i>p</i> = 0.019*). However, bilateral linear bar designs improve denture comfort (<i>p</i> = 0.014*) and hygiene practices (<i>p</i> = 0.007*). There were no significant variations between the two attachment designs in the remaining items of VAS and OHIP-14 questions, except that the bilateral linear bar configuration demonstrated higher scores in functional limitation (<i>p</i> = 0.02*).The quadrilateral bar demonstrated greater patient satisfaction than the bilateral linear bar regarding denture stability/retention and biting or chewing food. However, the bilateral linear bars increase patient satisfaction with denture comfort and the ease of hygienic procedures. Furthermore, regarding the functional limitations of the OHIP-14 questions, the bilateral linear bar provides higher scores than the quadrilateral ones.</p>","PeriodicalId":12028,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Dentistry","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0045-1809912","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate four implant complete mandibular overdentures retained with different bar designs regarding patient satisfaction and oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL).Twenty participants were selected for this study. Each participant received four implants in the mandibular canine and first molar regions. All patients were divided into two equal groups based on their bar designs: quadrilateral (group I) and bilateral linear (group II). A visual analog scale (VAS) was used to quantify patient satisfaction, and OHRQoL was determined using the Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP-14). Three months later, the VAS and OHIP-14 questions were evaluated.For properly distributed data, continuous variables were shown as mean ± standard deviation. The Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare the two groups. The significance criterion is set at the 5% level. When p < 0.05, the results were deemed significant.Patient satisfaction differs significantly between the two groups, as the quadrilateral bar designs enhance denture support and retention (p = 0.034*) and biting or chewing food (p = 0.019*). However, bilateral linear bar designs improve denture comfort (p = 0.014*) and hygiene practices (p = 0.007*). There were no significant variations between the two attachment designs in the remaining items of VAS and OHIP-14 questions, except that the bilateral linear bar configuration demonstrated higher scores in functional limitation (p = 0.02*).The quadrilateral bar demonstrated greater patient satisfaction than the bilateral linear bar regarding denture stability/retention and biting or chewing food. However, the bilateral linear bars increase patient satisfaction with denture comfort and the ease of hygienic procedures. Furthermore, regarding the functional limitations of the OHIP-14 questions, the bilateral linear bar provides higher scores than the quadrilateral ones.

患者满意度和下颌种植覆盖义齿的四边形棒与双侧线性棒:随机对照临床试验。
本研究旨在评估四种不同牙棒设计的下颌种植全口覆盖义齿对患者满意度和口腔健康相关生活质量的影响。本研究共选取20名受试者。每个参与者在下颌犬齿和第一磨牙区域接受了四个种植体。所有患者根据柱形设计分为两组:四边形(组I)和双侧线性(组II)。使用视觉模拟量表(VAS)量化患者满意度,并使用口腔健康影响量表(OHIP-14)确定OHRQoL。3个月后,对VAS和OHIP-14问题进行评估。对于分布适当的数据,连续变量表示为平均值±标准差。采用Mann-Whitney U检验对两组进行比较。显著性标准设为5%水平。当p p = 0.034*),咬或咀嚼食物(p = 0.019*)。然而,双侧线性棒设计改善了义齿舒适度(p = 0.014*)和卫生习惯(p = 0.007*)。两种附件设计在VAS和OHIP-14问题的其余项目中没有显著差异,除了双侧线性杆配置在功能限制方面得分更高(p = 0.02*)。在义齿稳定性/固位和咬或咀嚼食物方面,四边形杆比双侧线形杆表现出更高的患者满意度。然而,双侧线形条增加了患者对义齿舒适度和卫生程序的满意度。此外,在OHIP-14问题的功能限制方面,双侧线性条的得分高于四边形。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Journal of Dentistry
European Journal of Dentistry Dentistry-Dentistry (all)
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
161
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Dentistry is the official journal of the Dental Investigations Society, based in Turkey. It is a double-blinded peer-reviewed, Open Access, multi-disciplinary international journal addressing various aspects of dentistry. The journal''s board consists of eminent investigators in dentistry from across the globe and presents an ideal international composition. The journal encourages its authors to submit original investigations, reviews, and reports addressing various divisions of dentistry including oral pathology, prosthodontics, endodontics, orthodontics etc. It is available both online and in print.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信