Improving Diabetes Monitoring in People with Sub-optimally Controlled Diabetes: Implementing a Clinical Laboratory-Led Quality Improvement Initiative in General Practice.

IF 3.8 3区 医学 Q2 Medicine
David Holland, Ian Halsall, Adrian H Heald, Mike Stedman, Fahmy W F Hanna, Anthony A Fryer
{"title":"Improving Diabetes Monitoring in People with Sub-optimally Controlled Diabetes: Implementing a Clinical Laboratory-Led Quality Improvement Initiative in General Practice.","authors":"David Holland, Ian Halsall, Adrian H Heald, Mike Stedman, Fahmy W F Hanna, Anthony A Fryer","doi":"10.1007/s13300-025-01766-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The appropriate use of glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c), the international standard for assessing overall glycaemic status in diabetes mellitus, is critical to ensuring optimal clinical outcome and minimise complications. We describe a clinical laboratory-led general practice service development to facilitate targeted follow-up in high-risk patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The service development comprised monthly reports identifying high-risk individuals (HbA1c ≥ 58 mmol/mol) overdue HbA1c testing, sent by the Clinical Biochemistry Laboratory to general practices in the 'Intervention' group (n = 60). A 'Non-intervention' group comprised 51 practices not sent the reports. Comparisons comprised: (i) intervention vs non-intervention groups during two time periods (pre-intervention: 2017-2020; 275,843 tests; 59,206 patients, and post-intervention: 2020-2023; 307,525 tests; 65,449 patients), (ii) pre- versus post-intervention in each group.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The intervention group (vs non-intervention group) showed larger net change in proportion overdue a test (- 20.6% vs - 10.3%, p < 0.001), particularly in the > 75 mmol/mol category (7.8-fold larger improvement, p < 0.001). Improvements were also observed in median time overdue in the 58-75 mmol/mol group (- 14.3 vs - 4.3%; p = 0.027). Improvements were identified in median HbA1c (p = 0.012) and overall proportion with HbA1c ≥ 58 mmol/mol (p = 0.037), compared with the non-intervention group, despite performing more tests/patient/year (p < 0.001). All remained significant after adjustment for practice characteristics (age, sex, social deprivation, list size, diabetes prevalence) and pre-intervention levels.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings indicate that clinical laboratories can support general practices facilitating targeting monitoring to high-risk patients. Providing succinct reports that identify patients overdue for testing can reduce the number of such patients, thereby improving diabetes control and increasing the achievement of target levels.</p>","PeriodicalId":11192,"journal":{"name":"Diabetes Therapy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diabetes Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13300-025-01766-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The appropriate use of glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c), the international standard for assessing overall glycaemic status in diabetes mellitus, is critical to ensuring optimal clinical outcome and minimise complications. We describe a clinical laboratory-led general practice service development to facilitate targeted follow-up in high-risk patients.

Methods: The service development comprised monthly reports identifying high-risk individuals (HbA1c ≥ 58 mmol/mol) overdue HbA1c testing, sent by the Clinical Biochemistry Laboratory to general practices in the 'Intervention' group (n = 60). A 'Non-intervention' group comprised 51 practices not sent the reports. Comparisons comprised: (i) intervention vs non-intervention groups during two time periods (pre-intervention: 2017-2020; 275,843 tests; 59,206 patients, and post-intervention: 2020-2023; 307,525 tests; 65,449 patients), (ii) pre- versus post-intervention in each group.

Results: The intervention group (vs non-intervention group) showed larger net change in proportion overdue a test (- 20.6% vs - 10.3%, p < 0.001), particularly in the > 75 mmol/mol category (7.8-fold larger improvement, p < 0.001). Improvements were also observed in median time overdue in the 58-75 mmol/mol group (- 14.3 vs - 4.3%; p = 0.027). Improvements were identified in median HbA1c (p = 0.012) and overall proportion with HbA1c ≥ 58 mmol/mol (p = 0.037), compared with the non-intervention group, despite performing more tests/patient/year (p < 0.001). All remained significant after adjustment for practice characteristics (age, sex, social deprivation, list size, diabetes prevalence) and pre-intervention levels.

Conclusions: Our findings indicate that clinical laboratories can support general practices facilitating targeting monitoring to high-risk patients. Providing succinct reports that identify patients overdue for testing can reduce the number of such patients, thereby improving diabetes control and increasing the achievement of target levels.

改善亚理想控制糖尿病患者的糖尿病监测:在全科实践中实施临床实验室主导的质量改进倡议。
适当使用糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)是评估糖尿病患者总体血糖状态的国际标准,对于确保最佳临床结果和减少并发症至关重要。我们描述了一个临床实验室主导的全科医生服务的发展,以促进高风险患者的有针对性的随访。方法:服务开发包括每月报告确定高危个体(HbA1c≥58 mmol/mol)逾期HbA1c检测,由临床生物化学实验室发送给“干预”组的全科医生(n = 60)。“不干预”组包括51家没有提交报告的诊所。比较包括:(i)两个时间段的干预组与非干预组(干预前:2017-2020;275843测试;59,206例患者,干预后:2020-2023;307525测试;65,449例患者),(ii)各组干预前后对比。结果:干预组(与非干预组相比)在逾期检测比例上显示出更大的净变化(- 20.6% vs - 10.3%, p 75 mmol/mol类别)(7.8倍的改善,p)结论:我们的研究结果表明临床实验室可以支持一般做法,促进对高危患者的针对性监测。提供简洁的报告,确定逾期检测的患者,可以减少此类患者的数量,从而改善糖尿病控制,提高目标水平的实现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Diabetes Therapy
Diabetes Therapy Medicine-Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
7.90%
发文量
130
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊介绍: Diabetes Therapy is an international, peer reviewed, rapid-publication (peer review in 2 weeks, published 3–4 weeks from acceptance) journal dedicated to the publication of high-quality clinical (all phases), observational, real-world, and health outcomes research around the discovery, development, and use of therapeutics and interventions (including devices) across all areas of diabetes. Studies relating to diagnostics and diagnosis, pharmacoeconomics, public health, epidemiology, quality of life, and patient care, management, and education are also encouraged. The journal is of interest to a broad audience of healthcare professionals and publishes original research, reviews, communications and letters. The journal is read by a global audience and receives submissions from all over the world. Diabetes Therapy will consider all scientifically sound research be it positive, confirmatory or negative data. Submissions are welcomed whether they relate to an international and/or a country-specific audience, something that is crucially important when researchers are trying to target more specific patient populations. This inclusive approach allows the journal to assist in the dissemination of all scientifically and ethically sound research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信