Rimegepant safety and patient-reported outcomes among triptan-naïve, triptan-using, and triptan-failure participants: Subgroup analysis of an open-label, multicenter study.

IF 4.6 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Cephalalgia Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-07-09 DOI:10.1177/03331024251343309
Jessica Ailani, Jelena Pavlovic, Glenn C Pixton, Terence Fullerton
{"title":"Rimegepant safety and patient-reported outcomes among triptan-naïve, triptan-using, and triptan-failure participants: Subgroup analysis of an open-label, multicenter study.","authors":"Jessica Ailani, Jelena Pavlovic, Glenn C Pixton, Terence Fullerton","doi":"10.1177/03331024251343309","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundRimegepant was safe and well tolerated in a multicenter, open-label, phase 2/3 trial for acute treatment of migraine administered as 75 mg every other day (EOD) and as needed (PRN; EOD + PRN) for 12 weeks or PRN for 52 weeks.MethodsPost-hoc analysis of this long-term safety study in adults was conducted according to five subgroups based on current and historical triptan use: current triptan use and no historical discontinued triptans; no current triptan use and no historical discontinued triptans (triptan-naïve); and history of =1, ≥1 and ≥2 discontinued triptans. Triptan failure was defined as discontinuation of any triptan, for any reason, including insufficient response and/or tolerability.ResultsThe proportion of participants with ≥1 on-treatment adverse event (AE) was 57.6-66.3% across triptan subgroups. Rimegepant-related AEs (17.7-23.2%), treatment discontinuations (1.6-3.8%) and the most common AE (upper respiratory tract infection, 7.7-9.5%) were consistent across subgroups. After long-term treatment, the proportion of participants who preferred rimegepant to their previous medication was >75% in all triptan subgroups.ConclusionsLong-term acute treatment of migraine with rimegepant 75 mg up to once daily was safe and well tolerated in triptan-naïve participants, current triptan users and those with single or multiple historical triptan discontinuations.Trial RegistrationNCT03266588.</p>","PeriodicalId":10075,"journal":{"name":"Cephalalgia","volume":"45 7","pages":"3331024251343309"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cephalalgia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03331024251343309","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BackgroundRimegepant was safe and well tolerated in a multicenter, open-label, phase 2/3 trial for acute treatment of migraine administered as 75 mg every other day (EOD) and as needed (PRN; EOD + PRN) for 12 weeks or PRN for 52 weeks.MethodsPost-hoc analysis of this long-term safety study in adults was conducted according to five subgroups based on current and historical triptan use: current triptan use and no historical discontinued triptans; no current triptan use and no historical discontinued triptans (triptan-naïve); and history of =1, ≥1 and ≥2 discontinued triptans. Triptan failure was defined as discontinuation of any triptan, for any reason, including insufficient response and/or tolerability.ResultsThe proportion of participants with ≥1 on-treatment adverse event (AE) was 57.6-66.3% across triptan subgroups. Rimegepant-related AEs (17.7-23.2%), treatment discontinuations (1.6-3.8%) and the most common AE (upper respiratory tract infection, 7.7-9.5%) were consistent across subgroups. After long-term treatment, the proportion of participants who preferred rimegepant to their previous medication was >75% in all triptan subgroups.ConclusionsLong-term acute treatment of migraine with rimegepant 75 mg up to once daily was safe and well tolerated in triptan-naïve participants, current triptan users and those with single or multiple historical triptan discontinuations.Trial RegistrationNCT03266588.

triptan-naïve、曲坦使用和曲坦失败参与者中巨大的安全性和患者报告的结果:一项开放标签、多中心研究的亚组分析
背景:在一项多中心、开放标签、2/3期临床试验中,drimegepant用于急性偏头痛治疗是安全且耐受性良好的,每隔一天(EOD)和根据需要(PRN)给药75mg;EOD + PRN)为12周或PRN为52周。方法对成人长期安全性研究进行事后分析,根据目前和历史使用曲坦类药物的情况分为五个亚组:目前使用曲坦类药物和没有停药史;目前没有曲坦类药物的使用,也没有停止使用曲坦类药物的历史(triptan-naïve);曲坦类药物停药史=1、≥1和≥2例。曲坦类药物失效定义为由于任何原因,包括反应不足和/或耐受性不足,停止使用任何曲坦类药物。结果在曲坦类药物亚组中,出现≥1次治疗不良事件(AE)的患者比例为57.6% ~ 66.3%。利美盖泮相关AE(17.7-23.2%)、停药AE(1.6-3.8%)和最常见AE(上呼吸道感染,7.7-9.5%)在亚组间一致。在长期治疗后,在所有曲坦类药物亚组中,更喜欢利美格坦的参与者比例为75%。结论:对于triptan-naïve参与者、目前使用曲坦类药物的患者以及有单次或多次曲坦类药物停药史的患者,长期急性偏头痛治疗rimegepant 75mg每日1次是安全且耐受性良好的。RegistrationNCT03266588审判。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cephalalgia
Cephalalgia 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
10.10
自引率
6.10%
发文量
108
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Cephalalgia contains original peer reviewed papers on all aspects of headache. The journal provides an international forum for original research papers, review articles and short communications. Published monthly on behalf of the International Headache Society, Cephalalgia''s rapid review averages 5 ½ weeks from author submission to first decision.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信