Psychosocial impact of living with an indwelling pleural catheter in patients with malignant pleural effusions: a thematic analysis.

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q1 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
Junyi Zhang, Janeth Liang, Laletha Agoramoorthy, Shanik Montalvo, Owais Kadwani, Gillian Radcliffe, Parthipan Sivakumar
{"title":"Psychosocial impact of living with an indwelling pleural catheter in patients with malignant pleural effusions: a thematic analysis.","authors":"Junyi Zhang, Janeth Liang, Laletha Agoramoorthy, Shanik Montalvo, Owais Kadwani, Gillian Radcliffe, Parthipan Sivakumar","doi":"10.1136/bmjresp-2024-002993","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Breathlessness is a frequent and debilitating symptom experienced by patients with malignant pleural effusions (MPEs). Indwelling pleural catheters (IPCs) are a recommended first line treatment option, but the psychological and social impact of living with one is poorly understood.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To determine the psychosocial impact of living with an IPC among patients with MPEs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>18 adult English-speaking patients undergoing IPC management for MPEs were recruited at a single pleural centre in London, UK, between May 2022 and 2023. 23 semi-structured interviews were conducted at 2 weeks and 6-8 weeks post IPC insertion. Inductive thematic analysis of the interview transcripts was used to identify key psychosocial impacts and modulatory factors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>13 participants completed the semi-structured interviews, mean age 67, 54% female. Seven themes relating to the psychosocial impacts experienced by individuals living with an IPC were identified: anxiety, activities, relationships, independence and control, expectations and adjustments to IPC, acceptance and confidence. These evolved over time, with both positive and negative effects. The effects of the psychosocial impacts were further mediated by three modulatory factors: IPC mediated changes, challenges of IPC care and the overarching impact of cancer. These exerted varying degrees of influence on individuals' psychosocial wellbeing.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This qualitative study highlights for the first time the range of psychosocial impacts experienced by individuals living with an IPC. Identifying the modulatory factors and understanding how these impact patient experience can help to direct future interventions aiming to improve the psychosocial wellbeing for this population.</p><p><strong>Trial registration number: </strong>NCT05372055.</p>","PeriodicalId":9048,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open Respiratory Research","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12243593/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Open Respiratory Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjresp-2024-002993","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Breathlessness is a frequent and debilitating symptom experienced by patients with malignant pleural effusions (MPEs). Indwelling pleural catheters (IPCs) are a recommended first line treatment option, but the psychological and social impact of living with one is poorly understood.

Objectives: To determine the psychosocial impact of living with an IPC among patients with MPEs.

Methods: 18 adult English-speaking patients undergoing IPC management for MPEs were recruited at a single pleural centre in London, UK, between May 2022 and 2023. 23 semi-structured interviews were conducted at 2 weeks and 6-8 weeks post IPC insertion. Inductive thematic analysis of the interview transcripts was used to identify key psychosocial impacts and modulatory factors.

Results: 13 participants completed the semi-structured interviews, mean age 67, 54% female. Seven themes relating to the psychosocial impacts experienced by individuals living with an IPC were identified: anxiety, activities, relationships, independence and control, expectations and adjustments to IPC, acceptance and confidence. These evolved over time, with both positive and negative effects. The effects of the psychosocial impacts were further mediated by three modulatory factors: IPC mediated changes, challenges of IPC care and the overarching impact of cancer. These exerted varying degrees of influence on individuals' psychosocial wellbeing.

Conclusions: This qualitative study highlights for the first time the range of psychosocial impacts experienced by individuals living with an IPC. Identifying the modulatory factors and understanding how these impact patient experience can help to direct future interventions aiming to improve the psychosocial wellbeing for this population.

Trial registration number: NCT05372055.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

恶性胸腔积液患者留置胸膜导管的心理社会影响:专题分析。
背景:呼吸困难是恶性胸腔积液(MPEs)患者常见的虚弱症状。留置胸膜导管(IPCs)是一种推荐的一线治疗选择,但人们对留置胸膜导管的心理和社会影响知之甚少。目的:确定MPEs患者生活在IPC中的社会心理影响。方法:在2022年5月至2023年5月期间,在英国伦敦的一个胸膜中心招募了18名接受IPC管理的成年英语患者。在IPC插入后2周和6-8周进行了23次半结构化访谈。访谈记录的归纳专题分析用于确定关键的社会心理影响和调节因素。结果:13名参与者完成了半结构化访谈,平均年龄67岁,女性占54%。确定了与IPC患者所经历的社会心理影响相关的七个主题:焦虑、活动、关系、独立和控制、对IPC的期望和调整、接受和信心。这些随着时间的推移而演变,既有积极的影响,也有消极的影响。心理社会影响的影响由三个调节因素进一步介导:IPC介导的变化、IPC护理的挑战和癌症的总体影响。这些因素对个人的社会心理健康产生了不同程度的影响。结论:这项定性研究首次强调了IPC患者所经历的社会心理影响范围。确定调节因素并了解这些因素如何影响患者体验可以帮助指导未来的干预措施,旨在改善这一人群的社会心理健康。试验注册号:NCT05372055。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMJ Open Respiratory Research
BMJ Open Respiratory Research RESPIRATORY SYSTEM-
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
2.40%
发文量
95
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: BMJ Open Respiratory Research is a peer-reviewed, open access journal publishing respiratory and critical care medicine. It is the sister journal to Thorax and co-owned by the British Thoracic Society and BMJ. The journal focuses on robustness of methodology and scientific rigour with less emphasis on novelty or perceived impact. BMJ Open Respiratory Research operates a rapid review process, with continuous publication online, ensuring timely, up-to-date research is available worldwide. The journal publishes review articles and all research study types: Basic science including laboratory based experiments and animal models, Pilot studies or proof of concept, Observational studies, Study protocols, Registries, Clinical trials from phase I to multicentre randomised clinical trials, Systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信