Exclusion-based exome sequencing in critically ill adults 18-40 years old has a 24% diagnostic rate and finds racial disparities in access to genetic testing.
Jessica I Gold, Colleen M Kripke, Theodore G Drivas
{"title":"Exclusion-based exome sequencing in critically ill adults 18-40 years old has a 24% diagnostic rate and finds racial disparities in access to genetic testing.","authors":"Jessica I Gold, Colleen M Kripke, Theodore G Drivas","doi":"10.1016/j.ajhg.2025.06.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Despite the well-documented benefits of genome sequencing in critically ill pediatric patients, genomic testing is rarely utilized in critically ill adults, and data on its diagnostic yield and clinical implications in this population are lacking. We retrospectively analyzed whole-exome sequencing (WES) data from 365 adults ages 18-40 years with intensive care unit (ICU) admissions at the University of Pennsylvania Health System. For each participant, two medical genetics- and internal medicine-trained clinicians reviewed WES reports and patient charts for variant classification, result interpretation, and identification of genetic diagnoses related to their critical illness. We identified a diagnostic genetic variant in 24.4% of patients, with nearly half of these being unknown to patients and their care teams at the time of ICU admission. Of these genetic diagnoses, 76.6% conferred specific care-altering medical management recommendations. Importantly, diagnostic yield did not decrease with increasing patient age, and patients with undocumented diagnoses trended toward higher mortality rates compared to either patients with known diagnoses or patients with negative exomes. Significant disparities were seen by electronic health record-reported race, with genetic diagnoses known/documented for 63.1% of White patients at the time of ICU admission but only for 22.7% of Black patients. Altogether, the results of this study of broad, exclusion-based genetic testing in the critically ill adult population suggest that the broad implementation of genetic testing in critically ill adults has the potential to improve patient care and dismantle disparities in healthcare delivery.</p>","PeriodicalId":7659,"journal":{"name":"American journal of human genetics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of human genetics","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajhg.2025.06.007","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Despite the well-documented benefits of genome sequencing in critically ill pediatric patients, genomic testing is rarely utilized in critically ill adults, and data on its diagnostic yield and clinical implications in this population are lacking. We retrospectively analyzed whole-exome sequencing (WES) data from 365 adults ages 18-40 years with intensive care unit (ICU) admissions at the University of Pennsylvania Health System. For each participant, two medical genetics- and internal medicine-trained clinicians reviewed WES reports and patient charts for variant classification, result interpretation, and identification of genetic diagnoses related to their critical illness. We identified a diagnostic genetic variant in 24.4% of patients, with nearly half of these being unknown to patients and their care teams at the time of ICU admission. Of these genetic diagnoses, 76.6% conferred specific care-altering medical management recommendations. Importantly, diagnostic yield did not decrease with increasing patient age, and patients with undocumented diagnoses trended toward higher mortality rates compared to either patients with known diagnoses or patients with negative exomes. Significant disparities were seen by electronic health record-reported race, with genetic diagnoses known/documented for 63.1% of White patients at the time of ICU admission but only for 22.7% of Black patients. Altogether, the results of this study of broad, exclusion-based genetic testing in the critically ill adult population suggest that the broad implementation of genetic testing in critically ill adults has the potential to improve patient care and dismantle disparities in healthcare delivery.
期刊介绍:
The American Journal of Human Genetics (AJHG) is a monthly journal published by Cell Press, chosen by The American Society of Human Genetics (ASHG) as its premier publication starting from January 2008. AJHG represents Cell Press's first society-owned journal, and both ASHG and Cell Press anticipate significant synergies between AJHG content and that of other Cell Press titles.