Exclusion-based exome sequencing in critically ill adults 18-40 years old has a 24% diagnostic rate and finds racial disparities in access to genetic testing.

IF 8.1 1区 生物学 Q1 GENETICS & HEREDITY
Jessica I Gold, Colleen M Kripke, Theodore G Drivas
{"title":"Exclusion-based exome sequencing in critically ill adults 18-40 years old has a 24% diagnostic rate and finds racial disparities in access to genetic testing.","authors":"Jessica I Gold, Colleen M Kripke, Theodore G Drivas","doi":"10.1016/j.ajhg.2025.06.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Despite the well-documented benefits of genome sequencing in critically ill pediatric patients, genomic testing is rarely utilized in critically ill adults, and data on its diagnostic yield and clinical implications in this population are lacking. We retrospectively analyzed whole-exome sequencing (WES) data from 365 adults ages 18-40 years with intensive care unit (ICU) admissions at the University of Pennsylvania Health System. For each participant, two medical genetics- and internal medicine-trained clinicians reviewed WES reports and patient charts for variant classification, result interpretation, and identification of genetic diagnoses related to their critical illness. We identified a diagnostic genetic variant in 24.4% of patients, with nearly half of these being unknown to patients and their care teams at the time of ICU admission. Of these genetic diagnoses, 76.6% conferred specific care-altering medical management recommendations. Importantly, diagnostic yield did not decrease with increasing patient age, and patients with undocumented diagnoses trended toward higher mortality rates compared to either patients with known diagnoses or patients with negative exomes. Significant disparities were seen by electronic health record-reported race, with genetic diagnoses known/documented for 63.1% of White patients at the time of ICU admission but only for 22.7% of Black patients. Altogether, the results of this study of broad, exclusion-based genetic testing in the critically ill adult population suggest that the broad implementation of genetic testing in critically ill adults has the potential to improve patient care and dismantle disparities in healthcare delivery.</p>","PeriodicalId":7659,"journal":{"name":"American journal of human genetics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of human genetics","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajhg.2025.06.007","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Despite the well-documented benefits of genome sequencing in critically ill pediatric patients, genomic testing is rarely utilized in critically ill adults, and data on its diagnostic yield and clinical implications in this population are lacking. We retrospectively analyzed whole-exome sequencing (WES) data from 365 adults ages 18-40 years with intensive care unit (ICU) admissions at the University of Pennsylvania Health System. For each participant, two medical genetics- and internal medicine-trained clinicians reviewed WES reports and patient charts for variant classification, result interpretation, and identification of genetic diagnoses related to their critical illness. We identified a diagnostic genetic variant in 24.4% of patients, with nearly half of these being unknown to patients and their care teams at the time of ICU admission. Of these genetic diagnoses, 76.6% conferred specific care-altering medical management recommendations. Importantly, diagnostic yield did not decrease with increasing patient age, and patients with undocumented diagnoses trended toward higher mortality rates compared to either patients with known diagnoses or patients with negative exomes. Significant disparities were seen by electronic health record-reported race, with genetic diagnoses known/documented for 63.1% of White patients at the time of ICU admission but only for 22.7% of Black patients. Altogether, the results of this study of broad, exclusion-based genetic testing in the critically ill adult population suggest that the broad implementation of genetic testing in critically ill adults has the potential to improve patient care and dismantle disparities in healthcare delivery.

在18-40岁的危重患者中,基于排除的外显子组测序的诊断率为24%,并发现在获得基因检测方面存在种族差异。
尽管基因组测序在危重儿科患者中的益处得到了充分的证明,但基因组检测很少用于危重成人患者,并且缺乏关于其诊断率和临床意义的数据。我们回顾性分析了365名年龄在18-40岁的宾夕法尼亚大学卫生系统重症监护病房(ICU)患者的全外显子组测序(WES)数据。对于每个参与者,两名医学遗传学和内科医学培训的临床医生审查WES报告和患者图表,以进行变异分类、结果解释和鉴定与其危重疾病相关的遗传诊断。我们在24.4%的患者中发现了一种诊断性遗传变异,其中近一半的患者和他们的护理团队在ICU入院时不知道。在这些基因诊断中,76.6%给出了具体的改变护理的医疗管理建议。重要的是,诊断率没有随着患者年龄的增加而下降,与已知诊断或阴性外显子组的患者相比,未记录诊断的患者有更高的死亡率趋势。电子健康记录报告的种族存在显著差异,在ICU入院时,63.1%的白人患者已知/记录了遗传诊断,而黑人患者只有22.7%。总之,这项在危重成人人群中广泛的、基于排他性的基因检测的研究结果表明,在危重成人人群中广泛实施基因检测有可能改善患者护理并消除医疗保健服务中的差距。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
14.70
自引率
4.10%
发文量
185
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Human Genetics (AJHG) is a monthly journal published by Cell Press, chosen by The American Society of Human Genetics (ASHG) as its premier publication starting from January 2008. AJHG represents Cell Press's first society-owned journal, and both ASHG and Cell Press anticipate significant synergies between AJHG content and that of other Cell Press titles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信