Assessing Atopic Dermatitis Control in Chinese Patients: Validation of the Chinese Version of Recap of Atopic Eczema Questionnaire (RECAP) and an Investigation into Its Interpretability.

IF 3.5 4区 医学 Q1 DERMATOLOGY
Junfen Zhang, Shunmin Zhu, Liyan Yuan, Xiaoling Yu, Shiqi Ling, Jiao Zhang, Bin Yang
{"title":"Assessing Atopic Dermatitis Control in Chinese Patients: Validation of the Chinese Version of Recap of Atopic Eczema Questionnaire (RECAP) and an Investigation into Its Interpretability.","authors":"Junfen Zhang, Shunmin Zhu, Liyan Yuan, Xiaoling Yu, Shiqi Ling, Jiao Zhang, Bin Yang","doi":"10.2340/actadv.v105.43458","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The lack of a validated Chinese version of the Recap of Atopic Eczema questionnaire (RECAP) questionnaire limits its applicability. This prospective study, conducted at a Chinese tertiary hospital between April and November 2024, aimed to evaluate measurement properties of the Chinese RECAP. Participants completed RECAP and reference instruments at baseline, 1-3 days, and 4-6 weeks. Construct validity was evaluated through hypothesis testing, while reliability was assessed using standard error of measurement (SEMagreement) and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICCagreement). Interpretability of both single and change scores was examined using anchor-based methods. In total, 153 adults with atopic dermatitis (AD) (mean age 28.4 years, 51.0% male) were included, with approximately half having moderate-to-severe disease. Of the predefined hypotheses, 57.1% (single score) and 71.4% (change score) were confirmed. The SEMagreement was 1.99, and the ICCagreement was 0.96. Final RECAP bandings were established, with a binary cutoff of ≥ 11 defining uncontrolled AD. The Smallest Detectable Change was 5.5. while the Minimally Important Change was 3.5 using the receiver operating characteristics (ROC) method and 0.6 after adjustment via predictive modelling. Our finding confirmed that the Chinese RECAP is a valid, reliable, and responsive tool for evaluating eczema control. An improvement of ≥ 6 represents a real and clinically meaningful change.</p>","PeriodicalId":6944,"journal":{"name":"Acta dermato-venereologica","volume":"105 ","pages":"adv43458"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta dermato-venereologica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2340/actadv.v105.43458","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The lack of a validated Chinese version of the Recap of Atopic Eczema questionnaire (RECAP) questionnaire limits its applicability. This prospective study, conducted at a Chinese tertiary hospital between April and November 2024, aimed to evaluate measurement properties of the Chinese RECAP. Participants completed RECAP and reference instruments at baseline, 1-3 days, and 4-6 weeks. Construct validity was evaluated through hypothesis testing, while reliability was assessed using standard error of measurement (SEMagreement) and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICCagreement). Interpretability of both single and change scores was examined using anchor-based methods. In total, 153 adults with atopic dermatitis (AD) (mean age 28.4 years, 51.0% male) were included, with approximately half having moderate-to-severe disease. Of the predefined hypotheses, 57.1% (single score) and 71.4% (change score) were confirmed. The SEMagreement was 1.99, and the ICCagreement was 0.96. Final RECAP bandings were established, with a binary cutoff of ≥ 11 defining uncontrolled AD. The Smallest Detectable Change was 5.5. while the Minimally Important Change was 3.5 using the receiver operating characteristics (ROC) method and 0.6 after adjustment via predictive modelling. Our finding confirmed that the Chinese RECAP is a valid, reliable, and responsive tool for evaluating eczema control. An improvement of ≥ 6 represents a real and clinically meaningful change.

评估中国患者的特应性皮炎控制:中文版特应性湿疹问卷(Recap)的验证及其可解释性的研究。
由于缺乏经验证的中文版特应性湿疹问卷(Recap),限制了其适用性。这项前瞻性研究于2024年4月至11月在中国一家三级医院进行,旨在评估中国RECAP的测量特性。参与者在基线、1-3天和4-6周完成RECAP和参考工具。结构效度通过假设检验来评估,信度通过测量标准误差(SEMagreement)和类内相关系数(ICCagreement)来评估。使用基于锚点的方法检查了单一和变化分数的可解释性。总共纳入153名患有特应性皮炎(AD)的成年人(平均年龄28.4岁,51.0%为男性),其中约一半患有中度至重度疾病。在预先设定的假设中,57.1%(单一得分)和71.4%(变化得分)被证实。SEMagreement为1.99,ICCagreement为0.96。建立最终的RECAP分带,二元截止值≥11定义AD失控。最小可检测变化为5.5。使用受试者工作特征(ROC)方法的最小重要变化为3.5,通过预测模型调整后的最小重要变化为0.6。我们的发现证实了中国RECAP是一个有效、可靠和反应灵敏的评估湿疹控制的工具。≥6分的改善代表一个真实且有临床意义的改变。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acta dermato-venereologica
Acta dermato-venereologica 医学-皮肤病学
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
2.80%
发文量
210
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Acta Dermato-Venereologica publishes high-quality manuscripts in English in the field of Dermatology and Venereology, dealing with new observations on basic dermatological and venereological research, as well as clinical investigations. Each volume also features a number of Review articles in special areas, as well as short Letters to the Editor to stimulate debate and to disseminate important clinical observations. Acta Dermato-Venereologica has rapid publication times and is amply illustrated with a large number of colour photographs.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信