Household income modifies the association between social capital and gestational diabetes mellitus in Japan: Results from TMM BirThree Cohort Study.

IF 3.2 3区 医学
Koichi Sakakibara, Tomoki Kawahara, Nobutoshi Nawa, Keiko Murakami, Hisashi Ohseto, Ippei Takahashi, Akira Narita, Taku Obara, Mami Ishikuro, Masatsugu Orui, Aoi Noda, Genki Shinoda, Satoshi Nagaie, Soichi Ogishima, Junichi Sugawara, Shigeo Kure, Kengo Kinoshita, Atsushi Hozawa, Nobuo Fuse, Gen Tamiya, Wendy L Bennett, Shinichi Kuriyama, Takeo Fujiwara, Pamela J Surkan
{"title":"Household income modifies the association between social capital and gestational diabetes mellitus in Japan: Results from TMM BirThree Cohort Study.","authors":"Koichi Sakakibara, Tomoki Kawahara, Nobutoshi Nawa, Keiko Murakami, Hisashi Ohseto, Ippei Takahashi, Akira Narita, Taku Obara, Mami Ishikuro, Masatsugu Orui, Aoi Noda, Genki Shinoda, Satoshi Nagaie, Soichi Ogishima, Junichi Sugawara, Shigeo Kure, Kengo Kinoshita, Atsushi Hozawa, Nobuo Fuse, Gen Tamiya, Wendy L Bennett, Shinichi Kuriyama, Takeo Fujiwara, Pamela J Surkan","doi":"10.1111/jdi.70101","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>While social capital can prevent diabetes, these benefits can be heterogeneous with respect to socioeconomic status. We investigated the association between social capital and gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) while examining effect modification by household income.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We conducted a secondary data analysis using the Tohoku Medical Megabank Project Birth and Three-Generation Cohort Study carried out between July 2013 and March 2017. Social capital (mutual aid, social trust, informal social control, collective action) and covariates were self-reported, while GDM diagnosis and other medical and physiological information were obtained from medical records. To assess the association between social capital and GDM, we conducted logistic regression models. We further tested for interactions between social capital and household income as well as stratified the models by income.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 20,339 study participants, 700 (3.4%) were diagnosed with GDM. Multivariable logistic regression models found that social trust and collective action were associated with lower GDM prevalence, even after adjustment of covariates. When stratifying household income, however, social capital was significantly associated with the reduced risks of GDM only among participants with higher household income (OR: 0.90, 95% CI: 0.85-0.97). No significant association was observed among those with lower household income.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The health benefit of social capital on GDM prevalence was heterogeneous, and the protective effect of social capital on GDM was found only among women with higher household income. The differential impact of social capital on GDM highlights the need for targeted interventions addressing structural health inequities.</p>","PeriodicalId":190,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Diabetes Investigation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Diabetes Investigation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jdi.70101","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: While social capital can prevent diabetes, these benefits can be heterogeneous with respect to socioeconomic status. We investigated the association between social capital and gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) while examining effect modification by household income.

Materials and methods: We conducted a secondary data analysis using the Tohoku Medical Megabank Project Birth and Three-Generation Cohort Study carried out between July 2013 and March 2017. Social capital (mutual aid, social trust, informal social control, collective action) and covariates were self-reported, while GDM diagnosis and other medical and physiological information were obtained from medical records. To assess the association between social capital and GDM, we conducted logistic regression models. We further tested for interactions between social capital and household income as well as stratified the models by income.

Results: Among 20,339 study participants, 700 (3.4%) were diagnosed with GDM. Multivariable logistic regression models found that social trust and collective action were associated with lower GDM prevalence, even after adjustment of covariates. When stratifying household income, however, social capital was significantly associated with the reduced risks of GDM only among participants with higher household income (OR: 0.90, 95% CI: 0.85-0.97). No significant association was observed among those with lower household income.

Conclusions: The health benefit of social capital on GDM prevalence was heterogeneous, and the protective effect of social capital on GDM was found only among women with higher household income. The differential impact of social capital on GDM highlights the need for targeted interventions addressing structural health inequities.

日本家庭收入调节社会资本与妊娠期糖尿病的关系:来自TMM BirThree队列研究的结果。
虽然社会资本可以预防糖尿病,但这些益处可能因社会经济地位而异。本研究探讨了社会资本与妊娠期糖尿病(GDM)的关系,并考察了家庭收入对其影响的影响。材料和方法:我们使用2013年7月至2017年3月期间进行的Tohoku Medical Megabank Project出生和三代队列研究进行了二次数据分析。社会资本(互助、社会信任、非正式社会控制、集体行动)和协变量自述,GDM诊断和其他医疗生理信息从病历中获取。为了评估社会资本与GDM之间的关系,我们进行了逻辑回归模型。我们进一步测试了社会资本和家庭收入之间的相互作用,并按收入对模型进行了分层。结果:在20,339名研究参与者中,700人(3.4%)被诊断为GDM。多变量logistic回归模型发现,即使在协变量调整后,社会信任和集体行动也与较低的GDM患病率相关。然而,当对家庭收入进行分层时,社会资本仅在家庭收入较高的参与者中与GDM风险降低显著相关(OR: 0.90, 95% CI: 0.85-0.97)。在家庭收入较低的人群中没有观察到显著的关联。结论:社会资本对GDM患病率的健康效益存在异质性,社会资本对GDM的保护作用仅在家庭收入较高的女性中存在。社会资本对GDM的不同影响突出表明,需要采取有针对性的干预措施,解决结构性卫生不平等问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Diabetes Investigation
Journal of Diabetes Investigation Medicine-Internal Medicine
自引率
9.40%
发文量
218
期刊介绍: Journal of Diabetes Investigation is your core diabetes journal from Asia; the official journal of the Asian Association for the Study of Diabetes (AASD). The journal publishes original research, country reports, commentaries, reviews, mini-reviews, case reports, letters, as well as editorials and news. Embracing clinical and experimental research in diabetes and related areas, the Journal of Diabetes Investigation includes aspects of prevention, treatment, as well as molecular aspects and pathophysiology. Translational research focused on the exchange of ideas between clinicians and researchers is also welcome. Journal of Diabetes Investigation is indexed by Science Citation Index Expanded (SCIE).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信