S C Voss, D Schwenke, J Hempel, P Mirtschink, A Wevelsiep, L Gaborini, N Robinson
{"title":"Determining the Compliance of the Sysmex XR-1000 Haematology Analyser With WADA Athlete Biological Passport Specifications.","authors":"S C Voss, D Schwenke, J Hempel, P Mirtschink, A Wevelsiep, L Gaborini, N Robinson","doi":"10.1002/dta.3926","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The athlete biological passport (ABP) has been established as an anti-doping tool based on the statistical analyses of an athlete's biological variables over a period of time. It was introduced in 2007. An important aspect to ensure interlaboratory comparability was to use only one analytical platform-the Sysmex XT-2000. When the new Sysmex XN-1000 platform replaced the XT-2000i in 2019, there was a bias for the reticulocyte percentage. Although clinically insignificant, it interfered with interpreting athletes' haematological profiles for anti-doping purposes; therefore, it was necessary to adjust the haematological module. With the introduction of the new Sysmex XR-Series in 2023, an implementation of this new instrument could become necessary in the future. While the analytical performance of the XR-Series for clinical purposes has been evaluated previously, data in the context of ABP requirements, which are defined in WADA's technical documents, are not available. Therefore, our goals were to compare the XR-series with the XN-1000 and to evaluate their performance within an anti-doping context. Over 300 samples were analysed on the two instruments following WADA's technical document TD2021BAR, which defines the analytical requirements. The results for all ABP parameters including the calculated OFF-Score (OFF-hr) and the Abnormal Blood Profile Score (APBS) showed excellent interplatform comparability. In conclusion, our study demonstrates that the Sysmex XR meets WADA's requirements for haematological analysis. It can confidently replace the Sysmex XN in anti-doping laboratories without compromising the integrity of WADA's ABP longitudinal profiles.</p>","PeriodicalId":160,"journal":{"name":"Drug Testing and Analysis","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Drug Testing and Analysis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/dta.3926","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The athlete biological passport (ABP) has been established as an anti-doping tool based on the statistical analyses of an athlete's biological variables over a period of time. It was introduced in 2007. An important aspect to ensure interlaboratory comparability was to use only one analytical platform-the Sysmex XT-2000. When the new Sysmex XN-1000 platform replaced the XT-2000i in 2019, there was a bias for the reticulocyte percentage. Although clinically insignificant, it interfered with interpreting athletes' haematological profiles for anti-doping purposes; therefore, it was necessary to adjust the haematological module. With the introduction of the new Sysmex XR-Series in 2023, an implementation of this new instrument could become necessary in the future. While the analytical performance of the XR-Series for clinical purposes has been evaluated previously, data in the context of ABP requirements, which are defined in WADA's technical documents, are not available. Therefore, our goals were to compare the XR-series with the XN-1000 and to evaluate their performance within an anti-doping context. Over 300 samples were analysed on the two instruments following WADA's technical document TD2021BAR, which defines the analytical requirements. The results for all ABP parameters including the calculated OFF-Score (OFF-hr) and the Abnormal Blood Profile Score (APBS) showed excellent interplatform comparability. In conclusion, our study demonstrates that the Sysmex XR meets WADA's requirements for haematological analysis. It can confidently replace the Sysmex XN in anti-doping laboratories without compromising the integrity of WADA's ABP longitudinal profiles.
期刊介绍:
As the incidence of drugs escalates in 21st century living, their detection and analysis have become increasingly important. Sport, the workplace, crime investigation, homeland security, the pharmaceutical industry and the environment are just some of the high profile arenas in which analytical testing has provided an important investigative tool for uncovering the presence of extraneous substances.
In addition to the usual publishing fare of primary research articles, case reports and letters, Drug Testing and Analysis offers a unique combination of; ‘How to’ material such as ‘Tutorials’ and ‘Reviews’, Speculative pieces (‘Commentaries’ and ‘Perspectives'', providing a broader scientific and social context to the aspects of analytical testing), ‘Annual banned substance reviews’ (delivering a critical evaluation of the methods used in the characterization of established and newly outlawed compounds).
Rather than focus on the application of a single technique, Drug Testing and Analysis employs a unique multidisciplinary approach to the field of controversial compound determination. Papers discussing chromatography, mass spectrometry, immunological approaches, 1D/2D gel electrophoresis, to name just a few select methods, are welcomed where their application is related to any of the six key topics listed below.