Determining the Compliance of the Sysmex XR-1000 Haematology Analyser With WADA Athlete Biological Passport Specifications.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS
S C Voss, D Schwenke, J Hempel, P Mirtschink, A Wevelsiep, L Gaborini, N Robinson
{"title":"Determining the Compliance of the Sysmex XR-1000 Haematology Analyser With WADA Athlete Biological Passport Specifications.","authors":"S C Voss, D Schwenke, J Hempel, P Mirtschink, A Wevelsiep, L Gaborini, N Robinson","doi":"10.1002/dta.3926","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The athlete biological passport (ABP) has been established as an anti-doping tool based on the statistical analyses of an athlete's biological variables over a period of time. It was introduced in 2007. An important aspect to ensure interlaboratory comparability was to use only one analytical platform-the Sysmex XT-2000. When the new Sysmex XN-1000 platform replaced the XT-2000i in 2019, there was a bias for the reticulocyte percentage. Although clinically insignificant, it interfered with interpreting athletes' haematological profiles for anti-doping purposes; therefore, it was necessary to adjust the haematological module. With the introduction of the new Sysmex XR-Series in 2023, an implementation of this new instrument could become necessary in the future. While the analytical performance of the XR-Series for clinical purposes has been evaluated previously, data in the context of ABP requirements, which are defined in WADA's technical documents, are not available. Therefore, our goals were to compare the XR-series with the XN-1000 and to evaluate their performance within an anti-doping context. Over 300 samples were analysed on the two instruments following WADA's technical document TD2021BAR, which defines the analytical requirements. The results for all ABP parameters including the calculated OFF-Score (OFF-hr) and the Abnormal Blood Profile Score (APBS) showed excellent interplatform comparability. In conclusion, our study demonstrates that the Sysmex XR meets WADA's requirements for haematological analysis. It can confidently replace the Sysmex XN in anti-doping laboratories without compromising the integrity of WADA's ABP longitudinal profiles.</p>","PeriodicalId":160,"journal":{"name":"Drug Testing and Analysis","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Drug Testing and Analysis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/dta.3926","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The athlete biological passport (ABP) has been established as an anti-doping tool based on the statistical analyses of an athlete's biological variables over a period of time. It was introduced in 2007. An important aspect to ensure interlaboratory comparability was to use only one analytical platform-the Sysmex XT-2000. When the new Sysmex XN-1000 platform replaced the XT-2000i in 2019, there was a bias for the reticulocyte percentage. Although clinically insignificant, it interfered with interpreting athletes' haematological profiles for anti-doping purposes; therefore, it was necessary to adjust the haematological module. With the introduction of the new Sysmex XR-Series in 2023, an implementation of this new instrument could become necessary in the future. While the analytical performance of the XR-Series for clinical purposes has been evaluated previously, data in the context of ABP requirements, which are defined in WADA's technical documents, are not available. Therefore, our goals were to compare the XR-series with the XN-1000 and to evaluate their performance within an anti-doping context. Over 300 samples were analysed on the two instruments following WADA's technical document TD2021BAR, which defines the analytical requirements. The results for all ABP parameters including the calculated OFF-Score (OFF-hr) and the Abnormal Blood Profile Score (APBS) showed excellent interplatform comparability. In conclusion, our study demonstrates that the Sysmex XR meets WADA's requirements for haematological analysis. It can confidently replace the Sysmex XN in anti-doping laboratories without compromising the integrity of WADA's ABP longitudinal profiles.

确定Sysmex XR-1000血液分析仪符合WADA运动员生物护照规格。
运动员生物护照(ABP)是在对运动员一段时间内的生物变量进行统计分析的基础上建立的一种反兴奋剂工具。它于2007年推出。确保实验室间可比性的一个重要方面是只使用一个分析平台——Sysmex XT-2000。当新的Sysmex XN-1000平台在2019年取代XT-2000i时,存在对网状细胞百分比的偏见。尽管临床意义不显著,但它干扰了为反兴奋剂目的解释运动员血液学资料;因此,有必要调整血液学模块。随着2023年新Sysmex xr系列的推出,这种新仪器的实施可能在未来成为必要。虽然xr系列用于临床目的的分析性能之前已经进行了评估,但在WADA技术文件中定义的ABP要求背景下的数据是不可用的。因此,我们的目标是比较xr系列和XN-1000,并在反兴奋剂背景下评估它们的性能。根据世界反兴奋剂机构的技术文件TD2021BAR,在这两种仪器上分析了300多个样本,该文件定义了分析要求。所有ABP参数的结果,包括计算的OFF-Score (OFF-hr)和异常血谱评分(APBS),显示出良好的平台间可比性。综上所述,我们的研究表明Sysmex XR符合WADA的血液分析要求。它可以自信地取代Sysmex XN在反兴奋剂实验室,而不影响WADA的ABP纵向剖面的完整性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Drug Testing and Analysis
Drug Testing and Analysis BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS-CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
24.10%
发文量
191
审稿时长
2.3 months
期刊介绍: As the incidence of drugs escalates in 21st century living, their detection and analysis have become increasingly important. Sport, the workplace, crime investigation, homeland security, the pharmaceutical industry and the environment are just some of the high profile arenas in which analytical testing has provided an important investigative tool for uncovering the presence of extraneous substances. In addition to the usual publishing fare of primary research articles, case reports and letters, Drug Testing and Analysis offers a unique combination of; ‘How to’ material such as ‘Tutorials’ and ‘Reviews’, Speculative pieces (‘Commentaries’ and ‘Perspectives'', providing a broader scientific and social context to the aspects of analytical testing), ‘Annual banned substance reviews’ (delivering a critical evaluation of the methods used in the characterization of established and newly outlawed compounds). Rather than focus on the application of a single technique, Drug Testing and Analysis employs a unique multidisciplinary approach to the field of controversial compound determination. Papers discussing chromatography, mass spectrometry, immunological approaches, 1D/2D gel electrophoresis, to name just a few select methods, are welcomed where their application is related to any of the six key topics listed below.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信