{"title":"Multiscale dietary analysis of brown bears in Hokkaido, Japan","authors":"Jun Matsubayashi, Kazuki Miura, Eisuke Yamamori, Yuki Arimoto, Chikage Yoshimizu, Ichiro Tayasu, Hifumi Tsuruga","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.70047","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Understanding regional dietary differences in wildlife has traditionally focused on regional-scale comparisons. However, integrating individual- and intra-individual-scale analyses offers a more nuanced approach. In this study, we conducted a multiscale dietary analysis using stable isotope analysis to investigate spatial dietary patterns in brown bears (<i>Ursus arctos</i>) across mainland Hokkaido, Japan, with a particular focus on the Shibecha region in eastern Hokkaido, where significant livestock depredation has recently occurred. We measured isotope ratios in bone collagen from bears harvested in mainland Hokkaido, compared regional-scale diets through a mixing model, and assessed individual-scale isotopic variations using geostatistical models. Additionally, we conducted a retrospective isotope analysis of a single bear (OSO18) responsible for large-scale livestock damage in the Shibecha region, using samples of its humerus and body hair. Our results revealed that brown bears in the Shibecha region rely more heavily on sika deer (<i>Cervus nippon</i>) than do bears elsewhere in mainland Hokkaido. A subsequent individual-scale analysis indicated that elevated <i>δ</i><sup>15</sup>N values in the bears harvested from the Shibecha region were not strongly correlated with local deer density. Intra-individual analysis of OSO18 showed reliance on sika deer year-round, supplemented seasonally by anthropogenic dietary components such as dairy cattle and dent corn. Although the data were insufficient to provide a direct link between a highly carnivorous diet and the large-scale livestock predation by OSO18, it is possible that the increase in carnivorous bears in the Shibecha region represented a dietary shift caused by anthropogenic factors, such as mismanagement of sika deer carcasses left after harvest. Thus, investigations into how carnivory among brown bears may be affecting human–bear conflicts and what factors cause the high dependence of brown bears on sika deer are needed. This study demonstrates the utility of multiscale isotope analysis in elucidating regional dietary patterns and informing solutions to issues related to local wildlife management strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":17504,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Wildlife Management","volume":"89 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Wildlife Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://wildlife.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jwmg.70047","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Understanding regional dietary differences in wildlife has traditionally focused on regional-scale comparisons. However, integrating individual- and intra-individual-scale analyses offers a more nuanced approach. In this study, we conducted a multiscale dietary analysis using stable isotope analysis to investigate spatial dietary patterns in brown bears (Ursus arctos) across mainland Hokkaido, Japan, with a particular focus on the Shibecha region in eastern Hokkaido, where significant livestock depredation has recently occurred. We measured isotope ratios in bone collagen from bears harvested in mainland Hokkaido, compared regional-scale diets through a mixing model, and assessed individual-scale isotopic variations using geostatistical models. Additionally, we conducted a retrospective isotope analysis of a single bear (OSO18) responsible for large-scale livestock damage in the Shibecha region, using samples of its humerus and body hair. Our results revealed that brown bears in the Shibecha region rely more heavily on sika deer (Cervus nippon) than do bears elsewhere in mainland Hokkaido. A subsequent individual-scale analysis indicated that elevated δ15N values in the bears harvested from the Shibecha region were not strongly correlated with local deer density. Intra-individual analysis of OSO18 showed reliance on sika deer year-round, supplemented seasonally by anthropogenic dietary components such as dairy cattle and dent corn. Although the data were insufficient to provide a direct link between a highly carnivorous diet and the large-scale livestock predation by OSO18, it is possible that the increase in carnivorous bears in the Shibecha region represented a dietary shift caused by anthropogenic factors, such as mismanagement of sika deer carcasses left after harvest. Thus, investigations into how carnivory among brown bears may be affecting human–bear conflicts and what factors cause the high dependence of brown bears on sika deer are needed. This study demonstrates the utility of multiscale isotope analysis in elucidating regional dietary patterns and informing solutions to issues related to local wildlife management strategies.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Wildlife Management publishes manuscripts containing information from original research that contributes to basic wildlife science. Suitable topics include investigations into the biology and ecology of wildlife and their habitats that has direct or indirect implications for wildlife management and conservation. This includes basic information on wildlife habitat use, reproduction, genetics, demographics, viability, predator-prey relationships, space-use, movements, behavior, and physiology; but within the context of contemporary management and conservation issues such that the knowledge may ultimately be useful to wildlife practitioners. Also considered are theoretical and conceptual aspects of wildlife science, including development of new approaches to quantitative analyses, modeling of wildlife populations and habitats, and other topics that are germane to advancing wildlife science. Limited reviews or meta analyses will be considered if they provide a meaningful new synthesis or perspective on an appropriate subject. Direct evaluation of management practices or policies should be sent to the Wildlife Society Bulletin, as should papers reporting new tools or techniques. However, papers that report new tools or techniques, or effects of management practices, within the context of a broader study investigating basic wildlife biology and ecology will be considered by The Journal of Wildlife Management. Book reviews of relevant topics in basic wildlife research and biology.