Biomechanical Impact of Recurrent Childbirth on the Female Pelvic Floor

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q3 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Diana Fonseca, Dulce Oliveira, Rita Moura, Catarina Rocha, Marco Parente, Renato Natal
{"title":"Biomechanical Impact of Recurrent Childbirth on the Female Pelvic Floor","authors":"Diana Fonseca,&nbsp;Dulce Oliveira,&nbsp;Rita Moura,&nbsp;Catarina Rocha,&nbsp;Marco Parente,&nbsp;Renato Natal","doi":"10.1002/cnm.70053","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Every year, millions of childbirths occur globally, yet the rate of maternal morbidity and mortality remains unacceptably high. This study investigates the biomechanical impact of multiple vaginal deliveries on pelvic floor dysfunction (PFD), a key contributor to maternal morbidity. While the effects of first childbirth on pelvic floor injuries have been widely studied, less is known about the impact of subsequent deliveries. Epidemiological data show that the risk of PFD increases with the number of births, making it crucial to understand how later deliveries exacerbate damage. Using a finite element model, this research simulates the biomechanical effects of first and second vaginal delivery. The model incorporates pelvic floor muscles and a fetal head, considering factors such as muscle recovery and fetal head size. Simulations were run for both first and second deliveries, with varying recovery rates of muscle damage and fetal head sizes (50th and 5th percentiles). Results indicate that muscle damage is most severe at the pubovisceral muscle's origin, which is consistent with previous studies. In second-birth simulations, more muscle damage was observed, particularly when no recovery occurred. Smaller fetal head sizes led to less muscle stretch and accumulated damage. The study supports existing literature linking subsequent childbirths to a higher risk of PFD and highlights the importance of muscle recovery in mitigating damage. It also provides valuable insights into the biomechanics of childbirth, offering a step forward in improving understanding of pelvic floor injuries.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":50349,"journal":{"name":"International Journal for Numerical Methods in Biomedical Engineering","volume":"41 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal for Numerical Methods in Biomedical Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cnm.70053","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Every year, millions of childbirths occur globally, yet the rate of maternal morbidity and mortality remains unacceptably high. This study investigates the biomechanical impact of multiple vaginal deliveries on pelvic floor dysfunction (PFD), a key contributor to maternal morbidity. While the effects of first childbirth on pelvic floor injuries have been widely studied, less is known about the impact of subsequent deliveries. Epidemiological data show that the risk of PFD increases with the number of births, making it crucial to understand how later deliveries exacerbate damage. Using a finite element model, this research simulates the biomechanical effects of first and second vaginal delivery. The model incorporates pelvic floor muscles and a fetal head, considering factors such as muscle recovery and fetal head size. Simulations were run for both first and second deliveries, with varying recovery rates of muscle damage and fetal head sizes (50th and 5th percentiles). Results indicate that muscle damage is most severe at the pubovisceral muscle's origin, which is consistent with previous studies. In second-birth simulations, more muscle damage was observed, particularly when no recovery occurred. Smaller fetal head sizes led to less muscle stretch and accumulated damage. The study supports existing literature linking subsequent childbirths to a higher risk of PFD and highlights the importance of muscle recovery in mitigating damage. It also provides valuable insights into the biomechanics of childbirth, offering a step forward in improving understanding of pelvic floor injuries.

反复分娩对女性骨盆底的生物力学影响
全球每年有数以百万计的分娩,但孕产妇发病率和死亡率仍然高得令人无法接受。本研究探讨了多次阴道分娩对盆底功能障碍(PFD)的生物力学影响,盆底功能障碍是产妇发病率的一个关键因素。虽然首次分娩对骨盆底损伤的影响已被广泛研究,但对后续分娩的影响知之甚少。流行病学数据显示,PFD的风险随着出生数量的增加而增加,因此了解晚分娩是如何加剧损害的至关重要。利用有限元模型,本研究模拟了第一次和第二次阴道分娩的生物力学效应。该模型结合了骨盆底肌肉和胎儿头部,考虑了肌肉恢复和胎儿头部大小等因素。对第一次和第二次分娩进行模拟,肌肉损伤的恢复率和胎头大小(第50和第5百分位数)各不相同。结果表明,耻骨内脏肌起源处的肌肉损伤最为严重,这与以往的研究结果一致。在二次分娩模拟中,观察到更多的肌肉损伤,特别是在没有恢复的情况下。较小的胎儿头尺寸导致较少的肌肉拉伸和累积损伤。该研究支持了现有文献中关于产后患PFD风险较高的观点,并强调了肌肉恢复对减轻损伤的重要性。它也为分娩的生物力学提供了有价值的见解,为提高对骨盆底损伤的理解提供了一步。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal for Numerical Methods in Biomedical Engineering
International Journal for Numerical Methods in Biomedical Engineering ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL-MATHEMATICAL & COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
9.50%
发文量
103
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: All differential equation based models for biomedical applications and their novel solutions (using either established numerical methods such as finite difference, finite element and finite volume methods or new numerical methods) are within the scope of this journal. Manuscripts with experimental and analytical themes are also welcome if a component of the paper deals with numerical methods. Special cases that may not involve differential equations such as image processing, meshing and artificial intelligence are within the scope. Any research that is broadly linked to the wellbeing of the human body, either directly or indirectly, is also within the scope of this journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信