Is There Any Correlation Between Diffusion-Weighted Imaging and Histopathologic Findings of Meningioma? A Retrospective Study

IF 2.1 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Mahrokh Sadat Vaziri, Fahimeh Zeinalkhani, Soroush Alaeddini, Vahid Soleimani, Jayran Zebardast, Peyman Kamali Hakim, Hadise Zeinalkhani, Fahime Azizinik, Sina Delazar
{"title":"Is There Any Correlation Between Diffusion-Weighted Imaging and Histopathologic Findings of Meningioma? A Retrospective Study","authors":"Mahrokh Sadat Vaziri,&nbsp;Fahimeh Zeinalkhani,&nbsp;Soroush Alaeddini,&nbsp;Vahid Soleimani,&nbsp;Jayran Zebardast,&nbsp;Peyman Kamali Hakim,&nbsp;Hadise Zeinalkhani,&nbsp;Fahime Azizinik,&nbsp;Sina Delazar","doi":"10.1002/hsr2.71025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background and Aims</h3>\n \n <p>Meningiomas are common CNS tumors, with grading critical for treatment. This study aimed to determine if diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) correlates with histopathologic findings in meningioma, focusing on tumor grade, subtype, and Ki-67 index.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>This retrospective study included 68 patients with meningioma who underwent preoperative MRI with DWI. Tumor grade was determined using the WHO classification. DWI intensity was categorized as hyperintense, isointense, or hypointense relative to normal brain tissue. ADC values were measured, and diffusion restriction was defined as high signal intensity on DWI with low signal intensity on the ADC map. Histopathologic analysis assessed the Ki-67 proliferation index. Statistical analysis used ANOVA, Chi-square, univariable linear regression (β), and odds ratios (OR) via SPSS 17.0, with <i>p </i>&lt; 0.05 as significant.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The study included 68 patients with a mean age of 52.1 ± 15.6 years, mostly females (67.65%). Most tumors were grade 1 (73.5%) with male patients having higher tumor grades than females. Meningothelial was the most common subtype. DWI intensity correlated with tumor grade, with higher grades more likely to be hypointense. ADC values varied with tumor grades, being significantly higher in grade 1 tumors. Diffusion restriction was more common in higher-grade tumors. Ki-67 was higher in males (<i>p</i> = 0.01) and inversely linked to ADC (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Both qualitative DWI features and quantitative ADC values reflect meningioma grade and proliferative activity, with notable sex and subtype differences, underscoring the clinical utility of preoperative DWI.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":36518,"journal":{"name":"Health Science Reports","volume":"8 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/hsr2.71025","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Science Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hsr2.71025","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and Aims

Meningiomas are common CNS tumors, with grading critical for treatment. This study aimed to determine if diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) correlates with histopathologic findings in meningioma, focusing on tumor grade, subtype, and Ki-67 index.

Methods

This retrospective study included 68 patients with meningioma who underwent preoperative MRI with DWI. Tumor grade was determined using the WHO classification. DWI intensity was categorized as hyperintense, isointense, or hypointense relative to normal brain tissue. ADC values were measured, and diffusion restriction was defined as high signal intensity on DWI with low signal intensity on the ADC map. Histopathologic analysis assessed the Ki-67 proliferation index. Statistical analysis used ANOVA, Chi-square, univariable linear regression (β), and odds ratios (OR) via SPSS 17.0, with p < 0.05 as significant.

Results

The study included 68 patients with a mean age of 52.1 ± 15.6 years, mostly females (67.65%). Most tumors were grade 1 (73.5%) with male patients having higher tumor grades than females. Meningothelial was the most common subtype. DWI intensity correlated with tumor grade, with higher grades more likely to be hypointense. ADC values varied with tumor grades, being significantly higher in grade 1 tumors. Diffusion restriction was more common in higher-grade tumors. Ki-67 was higher in males (p = 0.01) and inversely linked to ADC (p < 0.001).

Conclusion

Both qualitative DWI features and quantitative ADC values reflect meningioma grade and proliferative activity, with notable sex and subtype differences, underscoring the clinical utility of preoperative DWI.

Abstract Image

脑膜瘤的弥散加权成像与组织病理表现是否相关?回顾性研究
背景和目的脑膜瘤是常见的中枢神经系统肿瘤,分级对治疗至关重要。本研究旨在确定扩散加权成像(DWI)是否与脑膜瘤的组织病理学表现相关,重点关注肿瘤分级、亚型和Ki-67指数。方法回顾性研究68例脑膜瘤患者术前行MRI和DWI检查。肿瘤分级采用WHO分级。相对于正常脑组织,DWI强度分为高、等或低。测量ADC值,将扩散限制定义为DWI上的高信号强度和ADC图上的低信号强度。组织病理学分析Ki-67增殖指数。统计学分析采用方差分析、卡方分析、单变量线性回归(β)和比值比(OR),采用SPSS 17.0进行统计分析,p <; 0.05为差异有统计学意义。结果共纳入68例患者,平均年龄52.1±15.6岁,女性居多(67.65%)。大多数肿瘤为1级(73.5%),男性患者的肿瘤级别高于女性。脑膜炎是最常见的亚型。DWI强度与肿瘤分级相关,分级越高越可能呈低信号。ADC值随肿瘤分级而变化,在1级肿瘤中明显更高。弥散限制在高级别肿瘤中更为常见。Ki-67在男性中较高(p = 0.01),与ADC呈负相关(p < 0.001)。结论DWI定性特征和ADC定量值均反映脑膜瘤分级和增殖活性,且性别和亚型差异显著,强调术前DWI的临床应用价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Health Science Reports
Health Science Reports Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
458
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信