Risk, Inequality, and Support for Social Insurance Reform in China

IF 2.6 3区 管理学 Q1 POLITICAL SCIENCE
Xian Huang
{"title":"Risk, Inequality, and Support for Social Insurance Reform in China","authors":"Xian Huang","doi":"10.1111/gove.70039","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Building on the policy feedback literature and the risk-based perspective of the welfare state, this study examines the causal link between policy and opinion in a non-democratic setting. I argue that the distinct distributional profiles of social insurance benefits and risks in the current system generate different feedback effects on public demands for social insurance reform. Drawing on original individual-level survey data collected in China between 2022 and 2023, I find that high financial risk in social insurance significantly increases individuals' support for cross-region integration of social insurance. In contrast, high inequality in the current social insurance has no such effects. The findings suggest that, given the looming financial pressure in China's fragmented and stratified social insurance system, citizens' support for cross-region integration of social insurance aligns with the government's strategy of prioritizing cross-region redistribution over cross-group redistribution. This policy feedback explains why the Chinese government can engage in “hard redistribution” without causing significant political and social instability driven by distributive conflicts.</p>","PeriodicalId":48056,"journal":{"name":"Governance-An International Journal of Policy Administration and Institutions","volume":"38 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/gove.70039","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Governance-An International Journal of Policy Administration and Institutions","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/gove.70039","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Building on the policy feedback literature and the risk-based perspective of the welfare state, this study examines the causal link between policy and opinion in a non-democratic setting. I argue that the distinct distributional profiles of social insurance benefits and risks in the current system generate different feedback effects on public demands for social insurance reform. Drawing on original individual-level survey data collected in China between 2022 and 2023, I find that high financial risk in social insurance significantly increases individuals' support for cross-region integration of social insurance. In contrast, high inequality in the current social insurance has no such effects. The findings suggest that, given the looming financial pressure in China's fragmented and stratified social insurance system, citizens' support for cross-region integration of social insurance aligns with the government's strategy of prioritizing cross-region redistribution over cross-group redistribution. This policy feedback explains why the Chinese government can engage in “hard redistribution” without causing significant political and social instability driven by distributive conflicts.

Abstract Image

中国社会保险改革的风险、不平等与支持
基于政策反馈文献和福利国家基于风险的视角,本研究考察了非民主环境下政策与民意之间的因果关系。笔者认为,现行制度下社会保险收益和风险的不同分布特征对社会保险改革的公众需求产生了不同的反馈效应。利用中国2022 - 2023年的原始个人层面调查数据,我发现社会保险的高财政风险显著增加了个人对社会保险跨地区一体化的支持。相比之下,目前社会保险的高度不平等没有这种影响。研究结果表明,考虑到中国支离破碎和分层的社会保险体系所带来的财政压力,公民对跨地区社会保险一体化的支持与政府优先考虑跨地区再分配而不是跨群体再分配的战略是一致的。这种政策反馈解释了为什么中国政府可以进行“硬再分配”,而不会因分配冲突而导致重大的政治和社会不稳定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
10.30%
发文量
91
期刊介绍: Governance provides a forum for the theoretical and practical discussion of executive politics, public policy, administration, and the organization of the state. Published in association with International Political Science Association''s Research Committee on the Structure & Organization of Government (SOG), it emphasizes peer-reviewed articles that take an international or comparative approach to public policy and administration. All papers, regardless of empirical focus, should have wider theoretical, comparative, or practical significance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信