Comparative Neuroplasticity in Frontal- and Lateral-Eyed Mammals With Induced-Binocular Vision Dysfunction: Insights From Monocular Deprivation Models

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q3 NEUROSCIENCES
Fábio Leite do Amaral Júnior, Thalyta Alves Rodrigues, Nonata Lúcia Trévia da Silva, Izabela Negrão Almeida Diniz, Luciana Negrão Almeida de Morais, Daniel Guerreiro Diniz, Dora Brites, Daniel Clive Anthony, Cristovam Wanderley Picanço Diniz
{"title":"Comparative Neuroplasticity in Frontal- and Lateral-Eyed Mammals With Induced-Binocular Vision Dysfunction: Insights From Monocular Deprivation Models","authors":"Fábio Leite do Amaral Júnior,&nbsp;Thalyta Alves Rodrigues,&nbsp;Nonata Lúcia Trévia da Silva,&nbsp;Izabela Negrão Almeida Diniz,&nbsp;Luciana Negrão Almeida de Morais,&nbsp;Daniel Guerreiro Diniz,&nbsp;Dora Brites,&nbsp;Daniel Clive Anthony,&nbsp;Cristovam Wanderley Picanço Diniz","doi":"10.1111/ejn.70179","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Visual cortical plasticity during early postnatal life is profoundly shaped by species-specific ocular anatomy and ecological demands. This review synthesizes comparative evidence on how monocular deprivation (MD)—a classical model of amblyopia—affects visual system development in frontal- versus lateral-eyed mammals. Frontal-eyed species, including cats and primates, exhibit extensive binocular field overlaps and columnar architecture in the primary visual cortex (V1), making them highly susceptible to MD-induced shifts in ocular dominance and synaptic remodeling. In contrast, lateral-eyed species such as rodents and ungulates possess limited binocular overlaps and lack well-defined ocular dominance columns yet still demonstrate significant MD-induced plasticity involving callosal reorganization, glial activation, and extracellular matrix remodeling. We examine shared and divergent cellular mechanisms underpinning these responses, including the role of parvalbumin-expressing interneurons, perineuronal nets, and neuromodulators like BDNF and NRG1. Rodent models support the notion that even in the absence of classical columnar organization, lateral-eyed species can undergo region-specific structural remodeling in V1 following MD. These distinctions underscore how binocular integration circuits are fine-tuned through extended critical periods in frontal-eyed species, whereas plasticity in lateral-eyed species is more diffusely distributed. The integration of cross-species data revealed conserved principles of visual cortical plasticity and identified mechanisms potentially targetable for amblyopia therapy. Understanding the ecological and anatomical context of plasticity allows for a more accurate interpretation of animal models and supports the development of precision strategies for visual rehabilitation. This comparative framework expands the scope of amblyopia research and offers new avenues for translational interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":11993,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Neuroscience","volume":"62 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ejn.70179","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ejn.70179","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Visual cortical plasticity during early postnatal life is profoundly shaped by species-specific ocular anatomy and ecological demands. This review synthesizes comparative evidence on how monocular deprivation (MD)—a classical model of amblyopia—affects visual system development in frontal- versus lateral-eyed mammals. Frontal-eyed species, including cats and primates, exhibit extensive binocular field overlaps and columnar architecture in the primary visual cortex (V1), making them highly susceptible to MD-induced shifts in ocular dominance and synaptic remodeling. In contrast, lateral-eyed species such as rodents and ungulates possess limited binocular overlaps and lack well-defined ocular dominance columns yet still demonstrate significant MD-induced plasticity involving callosal reorganization, glial activation, and extracellular matrix remodeling. We examine shared and divergent cellular mechanisms underpinning these responses, including the role of parvalbumin-expressing interneurons, perineuronal nets, and neuromodulators like BDNF and NRG1. Rodent models support the notion that even in the absence of classical columnar organization, lateral-eyed species can undergo region-specific structural remodeling in V1 following MD. These distinctions underscore how binocular integration circuits are fine-tuned through extended critical periods in frontal-eyed species, whereas plasticity in lateral-eyed species is more diffusely distributed. The integration of cross-species data revealed conserved principles of visual cortical plasticity and identified mechanisms potentially targetable for amblyopia therapy. Understanding the ecological and anatomical context of plasticity allows for a more accurate interpretation of animal models and supports the development of precision strategies for visual rehabilitation. This comparative framework expands the scope of amblyopia research and offers new avenues for translational interventions.

诱发双目视力障碍的额眼和侧眼哺乳动物的比较神经可塑性:来自单眼剥夺模型的见解
出生后早期的视觉皮质可塑性是由物种特异性的眼解剖和生态需求深刻塑造的。本文综述了单眼剥夺(MD) -弱视的经典模型-如何影响前眼和侧眼哺乳动物的视觉系统发育的比较证据。包括猫和灵长类动物在内的额眼物种,在初级视觉皮层(V1)中表现出广泛的双眼视野重叠和柱状结构,这使它们极易受到md诱导的眼优势转移和突触重塑的影响。相比之下,侧眼物种,如啮齿动物和有蹄类动物,双眼重叠有限,缺乏明确的眼优势柱,但仍表现出显著的md诱导的可塑性,包括胼胝体重组、胶质细胞激活和细胞外基质重塑。我们研究了支持这些反应的共同和不同的细胞机制,包括表达小蛋白的中间神经元,神经周围网络和神经调节剂如BDNF和NRG1的作用。啮齿类动物模型支持这样的观点,即即使在没有经典柱状组织的情况下,侧眼物种也可以在MD后的V1中经历特定区域的结构重塑。这些区别强调了双眼整合电路是如何通过延长的关键时期进行微调的,而侧眼物种的可塑性则更为分散。跨物种数据的整合揭示了视觉皮质可塑性的保守原理,并确定了弱视治疗的潜在靶向机制。了解可塑性的生态和解剖学背景可以更准确地解释动物模型,并支持视觉康复的精确策略的发展。这一比较框架扩大了弱视研究的范围,并为翻译干预提供了新的途径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Journal of Neuroscience
European Journal of Neuroscience 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
5.90%
发文量
305
审稿时长
3.5 months
期刊介绍: EJN is the journal of FENS and supports the international neuroscientific community by publishing original high quality research articles and reviews in all fields of neuroscience. In addition, to engage with issues that are of interest to the science community, we also publish Editorials, Meetings Reports and Neuro-Opinions on topics that are of current interest in the fields of neuroscience research and training in science. We have recently established a series of ‘Profiles of Women in Neuroscience’. Our goal is to provide a vehicle for publications that further the understanding of the structure and function of the nervous system in both health and disease and to provide a vehicle to engage the neuroscience community. As the official journal of FENS, profits from the journal are re-invested in the neuroscientific community through the activities of FENS.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信