Bears in North America: Habitats, hunting, and politics

IF 1.9 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ECOLOGY
Mark S. Boyce, Andrew E. Derocher
{"title":"Bears in North America: Habitats, hunting, and politics","authors":"Mark S. Boyce,&nbsp;Andrew E. Derocher","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.70057","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Populations of all 3 of North America's bear species have increased during the past 50 years, attributable to reduced persecution and improved management. Some actions consistent with the North American Model of Wildlife Conservation can explain these population increases, although conservation practices vary substantially among jurisdictions and species. Most management and conservation of North America's bear species is by state, provincial, or territorial agencies. However, federal engagement has occurred for grizzly bears (<i>Ursus arctos</i>), polar bears (<i>U. maritimus</i>), and some black bear (<i>U. americanus</i>) populations. Harvest has been the primary tool that agencies have used to manage bear populations. Increased focus on managing habitats and mitigating human–bear conflicts will help to ensure the long-term success of bear management in North America.</p>","PeriodicalId":17504,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Wildlife Management","volume":"89 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jwmg.70057","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Wildlife Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://wildlife.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jwmg.70057","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Populations of all 3 of North America's bear species have increased during the past 50 years, attributable to reduced persecution and improved management. Some actions consistent with the North American Model of Wildlife Conservation can explain these population increases, although conservation practices vary substantially among jurisdictions and species. Most management and conservation of North America's bear species is by state, provincial, or territorial agencies. However, federal engagement has occurred for grizzly bears (Ursus arctos), polar bears (U. maritimus), and some black bear (U. americanus) populations. Harvest has been the primary tool that agencies have used to manage bear populations. Increased focus on managing habitats and mitigating human–bear conflicts will help to ensure the long-term success of bear management in North America.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

北美的熊:栖息地、狩猎和政治
在过去的50年里,由于迫害的减少和管理的改善,北美所有三种熊的数量都有所增加。一些与北美野生动物保护模式相一致的行动可以解释这些种群的增长,尽管保护措施在不同的司法管辖区和物种之间存在很大差异。大多数对北美熊类的管理和保护是由州、省或地区机构负责的。然而,联邦政府已经对灰熊(Ursus arctos)、北极熊(U. maritimus)和一些黑熊(U. americanus)种群进行了干预。Harvest一直是各机构用来管理熊数量的主要工具。加强对栖息地管理和减少人熊冲突的关注,将有助于确保北美熊类管理的长期成功。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Wildlife Management
Journal of Wildlife Management 环境科学-动物学
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
13.00%
发文量
188
审稿时长
9-24 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Wildlife Management publishes manuscripts containing information from original research that contributes to basic wildlife science. Suitable topics include investigations into the biology and ecology of wildlife and their habitats that has direct or indirect implications for wildlife management and conservation. This includes basic information on wildlife habitat use, reproduction, genetics, demographics, viability, predator-prey relationships, space-use, movements, behavior, and physiology; but within the context of contemporary management and conservation issues such that the knowledge may ultimately be useful to wildlife practitioners. Also considered are theoretical and conceptual aspects of wildlife science, including development of new approaches to quantitative analyses, modeling of wildlife populations and habitats, and other topics that are germane to advancing wildlife science. Limited reviews or meta analyses will be considered if they provide a meaningful new synthesis or perspective on an appropriate subject. Direct evaluation of management practices or policies should be sent to the Wildlife Society Bulletin, as should papers reporting new tools or techniques. However, papers that report new tools or techniques, or effects of management practices, within the context of a broader study investigating basic wildlife biology and ecology will be considered by The Journal of Wildlife Management. Book reviews of relevant topics in basic wildlife research and biology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信