{"title":"Diagnostic challenges in uterine tumor resembling ovarian sex cord tumor: Two case reports","authors":"Yunqi Liu, Dong Zhang, Linzhi Gao, Siqi Zhou, Yuan Shen","doi":"10.1111/jog.70000","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Uterine tumors resembling ovarian sex cord tumors (UTROSCTs) are rare neoplasms, with cervical involvement posing exceptional diagnostic challenges. We report two cases: Case 1: a 43-year-old woman presenting with abnormal uterine bleeding and a cervical mass. An initial biopsy misinterpreted the lesion as a perivascular epithelioid cell tumor (PEComa), resulting in modified radical hysterectomy, bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, and pelvic lymphadenectomy. Subsequent multi-institutional histopathological consultation confirmed cervical UTROSCT. Case 2: a 53-year-old postmenopausal woman underwent hysteroscopic resection for endometrial thickening revealing UTROSCT, prompting total hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy. Both patients remain disease-free at 72 and 3 months postoperatively. These cases highlight UTROSCT's non-specific imaging features and frequent histomorphologic overlap with other benign and malignant entities, particularly in the cervix, necessitating immunohistochemical differentiation. Case 1 underscores how diagnostic error can lead to overtreatment. Comprehensive immunohistochemical evaluation is critical for accurate diagnosis. Although total hysterectomy remains standard management, fertility-sparing options may be appropriate for select patients. Long-term surveillance is recommended due to the risk of recurrence.</p>","PeriodicalId":16593,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research","volume":"51 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jog.70000","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Uterine tumors resembling ovarian sex cord tumors (UTROSCTs) are rare neoplasms, with cervical involvement posing exceptional diagnostic challenges. We report two cases: Case 1: a 43-year-old woman presenting with abnormal uterine bleeding and a cervical mass. An initial biopsy misinterpreted the lesion as a perivascular epithelioid cell tumor (PEComa), resulting in modified radical hysterectomy, bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, and pelvic lymphadenectomy. Subsequent multi-institutional histopathological consultation confirmed cervical UTROSCT. Case 2: a 53-year-old postmenopausal woman underwent hysteroscopic resection for endometrial thickening revealing UTROSCT, prompting total hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy. Both patients remain disease-free at 72 and 3 months postoperatively. These cases highlight UTROSCT's non-specific imaging features and frequent histomorphologic overlap with other benign and malignant entities, particularly in the cervix, necessitating immunohistochemical differentiation. Case 1 underscores how diagnostic error can lead to overtreatment. Comprehensive immunohistochemical evaluation is critical for accurate diagnosis. Although total hysterectomy remains standard management, fertility-sparing options may be appropriate for select patients. Long-term surveillance is recommended due to the risk of recurrence.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research is the official Journal of the Asia and Oceania Federation of Obstetrics and Gynecology and of the Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology, and aims to provide a medium for the publication of articles in the fields of obstetrics and gynecology.
The Journal publishes original research articles, case reports, review articles and letters to the editor. The Journal will give publication priority to original research articles over case reports. Accepted papers become the exclusive licence of the Journal. Manuscripts are peer reviewed by at least two referees and/or Associate Editors expert in the field of the submitted paper.