Biostimulant or biological? The complexity of defining, categorizing, and regulating microbial inoculants

IF 3.6 4区 农林科学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Connor N. Sible, Juliann R. Seebauer, Frederick E. Below
{"title":"Biostimulant or biological? The complexity of defining, categorizing, and regulating microbial inoculants","authors":"Connor N. Sible,&nbsp;Juliann R. Seebauer,&nbsp;Frederick E. Below","doi":"10.1002/ael2.70027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Agronomic use of specialty products known as biostimulants to improve crop productivity is growing. Traditionally, biostimulants are defined as any substance or microorganism applied to plants to enhance nutrient use efficiency, tolerance to abiotic stress, and crop yield and/or quality. However, grouping non-living products with living microbial inoculants poses regulatory guideline challenges. Moreover, peer-reviewed literature and regulatory legislation utilize “biostimulants” while industry and farmers have recently adopted the term “biologicals,” confusing discussions related to product regulation and policy. To better understand the challenges associated with this input sector, we have focused on four critical aspects: (1) the current regulatory status, (2) terminology disparity of biostimulants and biologicals, (3) key attributes that distinguish microorganisms from non-living biostimulants, and (4) mechanism of action differences between plant growth-promoting microorganisms and plant growth regulators. Therefore, we propose that living beneficial microorganisms and non-living biostimulants be separated with distinct regulatory requirements.</p>","PeriodicalId":48502,"journal":{"name":"Agricultural & Environmental Letters","volume":"10 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ael2.70027","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agricultural & Environmental Letters","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://acsess.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ael2.70027","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Agronomic use of specialty products known as biostimulants to improve crop productivity is growing. Traditionally, biostimulants are defined as any substance or microorganism applied to plants to enhance nutrient use efficiency, tolerance to abiotic stress, and crop yield and/or quality. However, grouping non-living products with living microbial inoculants poses regulatory guideline challenges. Moreover, peer-reviewed literature and regulatory legislation utilize “biostimulants” while industry and farmers have recently adopted the term “biologicals,” confusing discussions related to product regulation and policy. To better understand the challenges associated with this input sector, we have focused on four critical aspects: (1) the current regulatory status, (2) terminology disparity of biostimulants and biologicals, (3) key attributes that distinguish microorganisms from non-living biostimulants, and (4) mechanism of action differences between plant growth-promoting microorganisms and plant growth regulators. Therefore, we propose that living beneficial microorganisms and non-living biostimulants be separated with distinct regulatory requirements.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

生物刺激素还是生物刺激素?微生物接种剂的定义、分类和调节的复杂性
在农艺学上,人们越来越多地使用生物刺激素等特殊产品来提高作物产量。传统上,生物刺激剂被定义为任何用于植物的物质或微生物,以提高养分利用效率,对非生物胁迫的耐受性,以及作物产量和/或质量。然而,将非活性产品与活微生物接种剂分组提出了监管指南的挑战。此外,同行评议的文献和监管立法使用“生物刺激物”,而工业界和农民最近采用了“生物制品”一词,混淆了与产品监管和政策相关的讨论。为了更好地理解与这一投入部门相关的挑战,我们关注了四个关键方面:(1)目前的监管状况,(2)生物刺激素和生物制剂的术语差异,(3)区分微生物与非活性生物刺激素的关键属性,以及(4)植物生长促进微生物和植物生长调节剂之间的作用机制差异。因此,我们建议将活的有益微生物和非活的生物刺激素分开,并提出不同的监管要求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
3.80%
发文量
28
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信