Risk metrics vs. rat metrics: An alternative approach to measuring and managing urban rat infestations

IF 1.9 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ECOLOGY
Chelsea G. Himsworth, Kaylee A. Byers
{"title":"Risk metrics vs. rat metrics: An alternative approach to measuring and managing urban rat infestations","authors":"Chelsea G. Himsworth,&nbsp;Kaylee A. Byers","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.70052","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Urban Norway rats (<i>Rattus norvegicus</i>) and black rats (<i>R. rattus</i>) can have diverse and significant negative impacts on urban landscapes and residents. A variety of different approaches have been developed for measuring rat populations to support management efforts. However, the utility of these approaches has been limited, as they account for the magnitude but not the consequences of infestations and thus may not reflect the harm that cities are ultimately seeking to mitigate. We propose an alternative approach through the development of a rat risk index, which would add novel measures of rat-related impacts to existing measures of rat abundance. Such an index would be particularly useful for goal setting, program evaluation, and prioritization in the context of municipal rat management programs.</p>","PeriodicalId":17504,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Wildlife Management","volume":"89 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jwmg.70052","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Wildlife Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jwmg.70052","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Urban Norway rats (Rattus norvegicus) and black rats (R. rattus) can have diverse and significant negative impacts on urban landscapes and residents. A variety of different approaches have been developed for measuring rat populations to support management efforts. However, the utility of these approaches has been limited, as they account for the magnitude but not the consequences of infestations and thus may not reflect the harm that cities are ultimately seeking to mitigate. We propose an alternative approach through the development of a rat risk index, which would add novel measures of rat-related impacts to existing measures of rat abundance. Such an index would be particularly useful for goal setting, program evaluation, and prioritization in the context of municipal rat management programs.

Abstract Image

风险度量与老鼠度量:测量和管理城市老鼠侵扰的另一种方法
城市褐家鼠(Rattus norvegicus)和黑鼠(R. Rattus)会对城市景观和居民产生多种且显著的负面影响。已经开发了各种不同的方法来测量老鼠种群,以支持管理工作。然而,这些方法的效用有限,因为它们只考虑了虫害的规模,而不是后果,因此可能无法反映城市最终寻求减轻的危害。我们提出了另一种方法,即通过开发大鼠风险指数,在现有的大鼠丰度测量方法中增加新的大鼠相关影响测量方法。这样的指标对于目标设定、项目评估和城市鼠害管理项目的优先排序特别有用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Wildlife Management
Journal of Wildlife Management 环境科学-动物学
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
13.00%
发文量
188
审稿时长
9-24 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Wildlife Management publishes manuscripts containing information from original research that contributes to basic wildlife science. Suitable topics include investigations into the biology and ecology of wildlife and their habitats that has direct or indirect implications for wildlife management and conservation. This includes basic information on wildlife habitat use, reproduction, genetics, demographics, viability, predator-prey relationships, space-use, movements, behavior, and physiology; but within the context of contemporary management and conservation issues such that the knowledge may ultimately be useful to wildlife practitioners. Also considered are theoretical and conceptual aspects of wildlife science, including development of new approaches to quantitative analyses, modeling of wildlife populations and habitats, and other topics that are germane to advancing wildlife science. Limited reviews or meta analyses will be considered if they provide a meaningful new synthesis or perspective on an appropriate subject. Direct evaluation of management practices or policies should be sent to the Wildlife Society Bulletin, as should papers reporting new tools or techniques. However, papers that report new tools or techniques, or effects of management practices, within the context of a broader study investigating basic wildlife biology and ecology will be considered by The Journal of Wildlife Management. Book reviews of relevant topics in basic wildlife research and biology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信