In-vehicle multi-sensory experiences can reduce mental stress

IF 3.4 2区 工程技术 Q2 ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL
Jingkun Wang , Chiho Lim , Mansoor Nasir , Justine Nestorowich , Calandra Berry , Poushali Ray , Brandon J. Pitts , Denny Yu
{"title":"In-vehicle multi-sensory experiences can reduce mental stress","authors":"Jingkun Wang ,&nbsp;Chiho Lim ,&nbsp;Mansoor Nasir ,&nbsp;Justine Nestorowich ,&nbsp;Calandra Berry ,&nbsp;Poushali Ray ,&nbsp;Brandon J. Pitts ,&nbsp;Denny Yu","doi":"10.1016/j.apergo.2025.104592","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Daily stress is a widespread and growing concern that impacts both mental and physical well-being. Although many evidence-based strategies exist, including yoga, mindfulness, cognitive-behavioral techniques, and sensory approaches such as scent, massage, auditory, and visual stimulation, they often require time, training, or specialized environments, which limits their accessibility in everyday life. This study explores an alternative, practical approach by evaluating a multi-sensory in-vehicle relaxation system designed for use while the vehicle is stationary. Given that personal vehicles are central to daily routines, they present an underutilized yet promising space for passive stress recovery. Forty-eight participants engaged in three conditions following a stress-inducing cognitive task: a control (no relaxation), multi-sensory relaxation without scent, and multi-sensory relaxation with scent. Physiological responses were measured via EEG and ECG, and subjective stress ratings were collected to assess each condition's impact. Both multi-sensory relaxation experiences (with and without scent) significantly reduced stress compared to the control. The relaxation methods resulted in a 33 ms increase in mean RR, a 5 ms increase in RMSSD, and an increase in the alpha/beta ratio at frontal EEG channels. Ninety-eight percent of participants preferred the relaxation experience over the control experience, and 62 % indicated they would use it regularly in similar scenarios. These findings suggest that multi-sensory relaxation methods can reduce stress following a cognitively demanding task and are well-received by participants. Integrating such relaxation experiences into vehicles could reduce stress.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55502,"journal":{"name":"Applied Ergonomics","volume":"129 ","pages":"Article 104592"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Ergonomics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0003687025001280","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Daily stress is a widespread and growing concern that impacts both mental and physical well-being. Although many evidence-based strategies exist, including yoga, mindfulness, cognitive-behavioral techniques, and sensory approaches such as scent, massage, auditory, and visual stimulation, they often require time, training, or specialized environments, which limits their accessibility in everyday life. This study explores an alternative, practical approach by evaluating a multi-sensory in-vehicle relaxation system designed for use while the vehicle is stationary. Given that personal vehicles are central to daily routines, they present an underutilized yet promising space for passive stress recovery. Forty-eight participants engaged in three conditions following a stress-inducing cognitive task: a control (no relaxation), multi-sensory relaxation without scent, and multi-sensory relaxation with scent. Physiological responses were measured via EEG and ECG, and subjective stress ratings were collected to assess each condition's impact. Both multi-sensory relaxation experiences (with and without scent) significantly reduced stress compared to the control. The relaxation methods resulted in a 33 ms increase in mean RR, a 5 ms increase in RMSSD, and an increase in the alpha/beta ratio at frontal EEG channels. Ninety-eight percent of participants preferred the relaxation experience over the control experience, and 62 % indicated they would use it regularly in similar scenarios. These findings suggest that multi-sensory relaxation methods can reduce stress following a cognitively demanding task and are well-received by participants. Integrating such relaxation experiences into vehicles could reduce stress.
车内多感官体验可以减轻精神压力
日常压力是一个影响身心健康的广泛且日益增长的问题。尽管存在许多基于证据的策略,包括瑜伽、正念、认知行为技术和感官方法,如气味、按摩、听觉和视觉刺激,但它们通常需要时间、训练或专门的环境,这限制了它们在日常生活中的可及性。本研究通过评估一种多感官车内放松系统,探索了一种替代的、实用的方法,该系统专为车辆静止时使用而设计。鉴于私家车是日常生活的中心,它们为被动压力恢复提供了一个未被充分利用但前景广阔的空间。48名参与者在压力诱导的认知任务后参与了三种情况:控制(没有放松)、没有气味的多感官放松和有气味的多感官放松。通过脑电图和心电图测量生理反应,并收集主观应激评分来评估每种情况的影响。与对照组相比,两种多感官放松体验(有和没有气味)都显著减少了压力。放松方法导致平均RR增加33 ms, RMSSD增加5 ms,额叶脑电图通道α / β比增加。98%的参与者更喜欢放松体验而不是控制体验,62%的人表示他们会在类似的场景中经常使用放松体验。这些发现表明,多感官放松方法可以减轻认知要求高的任务后的压力,并受到参与者的欢迎。将这种放松体验融入车辆中可以减轻压力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Applied Ergonomics
Applied Ergonomics 工程技术-工程:工业
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
9.40%
发文量
248
审稿时长
53 days
期刊介绍: Applied Ergonomics is aimed at ergonomists and all those interested in applying ergonomics/human factors in the design, planning and management of technical and social systems at work or leisure. Readership is truly international with subscribers in over 50 countries. Professionals for whom Applied Ergonomics is of interest include: ergonomists, designers, industrial engineers, health and safety specialists, systems engineers, design engineers, organizational psychologists, occupational health specialists and human-computer interaction specialists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信