{"title":"Undersea cables, geoeconomics, and security in the Indo-Pacific: Risks and resilience","authors":"Kristi Govella","doi":"10.1016/j.marpol.2025.106809","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Undersea cables constitute the critical infrastructure of international data connectivity, transmitting over 95 % of global Internet traffic, and they have attracted increasing attention from policymakers recently. How are threats to undersea cable networks evolving, and why is cable competition intensifying in the Indo-Pacific region? How is the policy discourse around undersea cables changing, and what implications does this have for the physical realities of these networks and their resilience? This article introduces a framework for understanding recent developments and presents an analysis of cross-regional trends, providing the foundation for a Special Issue of <em>Marine Policy</em>. First, the article argues that risks to cable networks can be characterized along two dimensions—source and frequency—and that the fundamental risks to undersea cables have not changed dramatically. Instead, it is the understanding of these risks that has evolved due to securitization of the maritime and economic domains, driven partly by intensifying US-China rivalry. Second, although the extent to which the new discourse of cable securitization resonates varies across countries and companies, securitization is already reshaping the physical layout of regional cable architecture as investments are redirected to account for changing understandings of risk. Third, ensuring resilience requires a “whole life cycle” approach to cables that considers not only investment and construction but also licensing, regulation, maintenance, protection, and repair. By integrating undersea cables into broader discussions across marine policy, economics, and security, this article enables scholars and policymakers to more comprehensively assess risks and to formulate more effective solutions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48427,"journal":{"name":"Marine Policy","volume":"180 ","pages":"Article 106809"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Marine Policy","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308597X25002246","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Undersea cables constitute the critical infrastructure of international data connectivity, transmitting over 95 % of global Internet traffic, and they have attracted increasing attention from policymakers recently. How are threats to undersea cable networks evolving, and why is cable competition intensifying in the Indo-Pacific region? How is the policy discourse around undersea cables changing, and what implications does this have for the physical realities of these networks and their resilience? This article introduces a framework for understanding recent developments and presents an analysis of cross-regional trends, providing the foundation for a Special Issue of Marine Policy. First, the article argues that risks to cable networks can be characterized along two dimensions—source and frequency—and that the fundamental risks to undersea cables have not changed dramatically. Instead, it is the understanding of these risks that has evolved due to securitization of the maritime and economic domains, driven partly by intensifying US-China rivalry. Second, although the extent to which the new discourse of cable securitization resonates varies across countries and companies, securitization is already reshaping the physical layout of regional cable architecture as investments are redirected to account for changing understandings of risk. Third, ensuring resilience requires a “whole life cycle” approach to cables that considers not only investment and construction but also licensing, regulation, maintenance, protection, and repair. By integrating undersea cables into broader discussions across marine policy, economics, and security, this article enables scholars and policymakers to more comprehensively assess risks and to formulate more effective solutions.
期刊介绍:
Marine Policy is the leading journal of ocean policy studies. It offers researchers, analysts and policy makers a unique combination of analyses in the principal social science disciplines relevant to the formulation of marine policy. Major articles are contributed by specialists in marine affairs, including marine economists and marine resource managers, political scientists, marine scientists, international lawyers, geographers and anthropologists. Drawing on their expertise and research, the journal covers: international, regional and national marine policies; institutional arrangements for the management and regulation of marine activities, including fisheries and shipping; conflict resolution; marine pollution and environment; conservation and use of marine resources. Regular features of Marine Policy include research reports, conference reports and reports on current developments to keep readers up-to-date with the latest developments and research in ocean affairs.