Contrasting impacts of grassland restoration methods on soil greenhouse gases emissions under warming conditions in Northern Tibet

IF 5.4 1区 农林科学 Q1 GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Hao Shi , Fei Xia , Lin-ling Ran , Hao-yang Wu , Jun-qiang Wang , Yun-yin Xue , Wei Wei , Shai-kun Zheng , Shuang Yan , Cai-hong Yang , Yu Zhang , Xiao-qin Qiu
{"title":"Contrasting impacts of grassland restoration methods on soil greenhouse gases emissions under warming conditions in Northern Tibet","authors":"Hao Shi ,&nbsp;Fei Xia ,&nbsp;Lin-ling Ran ,&nbsp;Hao-yang Wu ,&nbsp;Jun-qiang Wang ,&nbsp;Yun-yin Xue ,&nbsp;Wei Wei ,&nbsp;Shai-kun Zheng ,&nbsp;Shuang Yan ,&nbsp;Cai-hong Yang ,&nbsp;Yu Zhang ,&nbsp;Xiao-qin Qiu","doi":"10.1016/j.catena.2025.109287","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In the context of climate warming, grassland restoration on Qinghai-Tibet Plateau (QTP) may have a significant impact on greenhouse gases (GHGs) emissions. However, the response of GHGs emissions, global warming potential (GWP) and temperature sensitivity coefficient (<em>Q<sub>10</sub></em>) from different restored grasslands on QTP to warming remains unclear. We adopted three restoration methods: natural-restoration (NR), no-till-replanting (S), and till-replanting (TS), using natural-degradation grassland (ND) as a control and an open top chamber (OTC) as a simulated warming (Ws) device to clarify the response mechanism of GHGs emissions to warming, and then we evaluated the GWP and <em>Q<sub>10</sub></em> of restored grasslands on the QTP. Under Wns conditions, S resulted in the lowest GHGs emissions (by 66.22 %) and the lowest GWP related to ND. Under Ws conditions, TS suppressed the emissions of CO<sub>2</sub> (by 23.43 %) and CH<sub>4</sub> (by 46.34 %), maintaining the lowest N<sub>2</sub>O increment and significantly reducing GWP compared to Wns (by 23.73 %). Under the Wns and Ws conditions, the contribution rate of CO<sub>2</sub> to GWP exceeded 93 % in all treatments, and Ws led to a decrease in the <em>Q<sub>10</sub></em> of GHGs. Structural equation model analysis showed that Ws and grassland restoration directly affected ROC, DOC, MBC and above-ground biomass (AGB), which in turn affected GWP. In summary, S effectively reduced GWP under Wns conditions, and GWP of TS was effectively alleviated under Ws conditions. Labile organic carbon and AGB are the preferred triggering factor for GWP under the conditions of Ws and grassland restoration. Our study offers a theoretical foundation and technical framework for advancing our comprehension of degraded grassland restoration and its implications for greenhouse gas dynamics on the QTP under climate warming scenarios.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":9801,"journal":{"name":"Catena","volume":"258 ","pages":"Article 109287"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Catena","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0341816225005892","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the context of climate warming, grassland restoration on Qinghai-Tibet Plateau (QTP) may have a significant impact on greenhouse gases (GHGs) emissions. However, the response of GHGs emissions, global warming potential (GWP) and temperature sensitivity coefficient (Q10) from different restored grasslands on QTP to warming remains unclear. We adopted three restoration methods: natural-restoration (NR), no-till-replanting (S), and till-replanting (TS), using natural-degradation grassland (ND) as a control and an open top chamber (OTC) as a simulated warming (Ws) device to clarify the response mechanism of GHGs emissions to warming, and then we evaluated the GWP and Q10 of restored grasslands on the QTP. Under Wns conditions, S resulted in the lowest GHGs emissions (by 66.22 %) and the lowest GWP related to ND. Under Ws conditions, TS suppressed the emissions of CO2 (by 23.43 %) and CH4 (by 46.34 %), maintaining the lowest N2O increment and significantly reducing GWP compared to Wns (by 23.73 %). Under the Wns and Ws conditions, the contribution rate of CO2 to GWP exceeded 93 % in all treatments, and Ws led to a decrease in the Q10 of GHGs. Structural equation model analysis showed that Ws and grassland restoration directly affected ROC, DOC, MBC and above-ground biomass (AGB), which in turn affected GWP. In summary, S effectively reduced GWP under Wns conditions, and GWP of TS was effectively alleviated under Ws conditions. Labile organic carbon and AGB are the preferred triggering factor for GWP under the conditions of Ws and grassland restoration. Our study offers a theoretical foundation and technical framework for advancing our comprehension of degraded grassland restoration and its implications for greenhouse gas dynamics on the QTP under climate warming scenarios.
增温条件下藏北草地恢复方式对土壤温室气体排放的影响对比
在气候变暖的背景下,青藏高原草地恢复对温室气体排放有显著影响。然而,不同恢复草地的温室气体排放、全球变暖潜势(GWP)和温度敏感系数(Q10)对气候变暖的响应尚不清楚。采用自然恢复(NR)、免耕复种(S)和耕复种(TS)三种恢复方式,以自然退化草地(ND)为对照,开放式顶室(OTC)为模拟增温(Ws)装置,明确温室气体排放对气候变暖的响应机制,并在QTP上评价恢复草地的GWP和Q10。在Wns条件下,S的温室气体排放量最低(减少66.22%),与ND相关的GWP最低。在Ws条件下,与Wns相比,TS抑制了CO2(23.43%)和CH4(46.34%)的排放,保持了最低的N2O增量,显著降低了GWP(23.73%)。在Wns和Ws处理下,CO2对GWP的贡献率均超过93%,wws导致ghg Q10的降低。结构方程模型分析表明,Ws和草地恢复直接影响ROC、DOC、MBC和地上生物量(AGB),进而影响GWP。综上所述,S在Wns条件下能有效降低GWP, TS在Ws条件下能有效降低GWP。在湿地和草地恢复条件下,稳定有机碳和AGB是全球潜能值的首选触发因子。本研究为进一步理解气候变暖情景下退化草地恢复及其对QTP温室气体动态的影响提供了理论基础和技术框架。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Catena
Catena 环境科学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
10.50
自引率
9.70%
发文量
816
审稿时长
54 days
期刊介绍: Catena publishes papers describing original field and laboratory investigations and reviews on geoecology and landscape evolution with emphasis on interdisciplinary aspects of soil science, hydrology and geomorphology. It aims to disseminate new knowledge and foster better understanding of the physical environment, of evolutionary sequences that have resulted in past and current landscapes, and of the natural processes that are likely to determine the fate of our terrestrial environment. Papers within any one of the above topics are welcome provided they are of sufficiently wide interest and relevance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信