Spirometry to predict dry powder inhaler performance: Insights from in-check DIAL

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
B.D. Ferraz , N. Faria , C. Lacerda , D. Mona , V. Almeida , P. Pinto , C. Martins , R. Lima , R. Marçôa , J. Gomes , M. Sucena , M. Guimarães
{"title":"Spirometry to predict dry powder inhaler performance: Insights from in-check DIAL","authors":"B.D. Ferraz ,&nbsp;N. Faria ,&nbsp;C. Lacerda ,&nbsp;D. Mona ,&nbsp;V. Almeida ,&nbsp;P. Pinto ,&nbsp;C. Martins ,&nbsp;R. Lima ,&nbsp;R. Marçôa ,&nbsp;J. Gomes ,&nbsp;M. Sucena ,&nbsp;M. Guimarães","doi":"10.1016/j.rmed.2025.108249","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) management involves pharmacologic therapy delivered via inhalers. Choosing the right inhaler can be challenging. The In-Check Dial G16®, designed as a training device, helps clinicians assess inspiratory capacity by simulating inhaler resistance but can be time-consuming. Spirometry quantitatively assesses lung function and is essential for COPD diagnosis. This study explores spirometry as a predictive tool for assessing the inspiratory flow required for dry powder inhalers (DPI).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We included COPD patients using inhalers for at least one month who underwent spirometry in two Portuguese hospitals. On the same day, patients' inhalatory capacity was evaluated with the In-Check DIAL G16®. Patients were considered able to use the DPI if they could achieve a flow higher than 30 L/min at least three times at the R3 resistance level.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Ninety-one patients enrolled, most using pressurized metered-dose inhaler/soft mist inhalers (37.4 %), low resistance (30.8 %), medium-low resistance (23.1 %), and medium resistance (8.8 %) inhalers. Peak inspiratory flow (PIF) best predicted DPI use, with a cut-off value of 3.10 L/s providing 69.2 % sensitivity and 76.9 % specificity. Forced inspiratory flow at 50% of FVC (FIF<sub>50</sub>) was the second-best predictor, with a cut-off value of 2.91 L/s, 63.7 % sensitivity, and 69.2 % specificity.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>PIF's strong correlation with inhalation capacity underlines spirometry's importance in COPD evaluations. Identified PIF and FIF<sub>50</sub> cut-off values assist clinicians in selecting appropriate inhalers. Spirometry offers a more accessible and time-efficient alternative to the In-Check Dial G16®, warranting further research to validate these findings and integrate spirometry-based assessments into COPD management.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":21057,"journal":{"name":"Respiratory medicine","volume":"246 ","pages":"Article 108249"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Respiratory medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0954611125003129","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) management involves pharmacologic therapy delivered via inhalers. Choosing the right inhaler can be challenging. The In-Check Dial G16®, designed as a training device, helps clinicians assess inspiratory capacity by simulating inhaler resistance but can be time-consuming. Spirometry quantitatively assesses lung function and is essential for COPD diagnosis. This study explores spirometry as a predictive tool for assessing the inspiratory flow required for dry powder inhalers (DPI).

Methods

We included COPD patients using inhalers for at least one month who underwent spirometry in two Portuguese hospitals. On the same day, patients' inhalatory capacity was evaluated with the In-Check DIAL G16®. Patients were considered able to use the DPI if they could achieve a flow higher than 30 L/min at least three times at the R3 resistance level.

Results

Ninety-one patients enrolled, most using pressurized metered-dose inhaler/soft mist inhalers (37.4 %), low resistance (30.8 %), medium-low resistance (23.1 %), and medium resistance (8.8 %) inhalers. Peak inspiratory flow (PIF) best predicted DPI use, with a cut-off value of 3.10 L/s providing 69.2 % sensitivity and 76.9 % specificity. Forced inspiratory flow at 50% of FVC (FIF50) was the second-best predictor, with a cut-off value of 2.91 L/s, 63.7 % sensitivity, and 69.2 % specificity.

Conclusion

PIF's strong correlation with inhalation capacity underlines spirometry's importance in COPD evaluations. Identified PIF and FIF50 cut-off values assist clinicians in selecting appropriate inhalers. Spirometry offers a more accessible and time-efficient alternative to the In-Check Dial G16®, warranting further research to validate these findings and integrate spirometry-based assessments into COPD management.
肺活量测定法预测干粉吸入器的性能:来自内检DIAL的见解
目的慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)的治疗包括通过吸入器进行药物治疗。选择合适的吸入器可能具有挑战性。In-Check Dial G16®是一种培训设备,通过模拟吸入器阻力来帮助临床医生评估吸气能力,但可能很耗时。肺活量测定法定量评估肺功能,对慢性阻塞性肺病的诊断至关重要。本研究探讨了肺量测定法作为评估干粉吸入器(DPI)所需吸入流量的预测工具。方法:我们纳入了在葡萄牙两家医院使用吸入器至少一个月并接受肺活量测定的COPD患者。在同一天,使用In-Check DIAL G16®评估患者的吸入量。如果患者在R3阻力水平下至少三次达到高于30l /min的流量,则认为可以使用DPI。结果共纳入91例患者,使用加压计量吸入器/软雾吸入器最多(37.4%),其次为低阻力(30.8%)、中-低阻力(23.1%)和中阻力(8.8%)吸入器。峰值吸气流量(PIF)最能预测DPI的使用,截止值为3.10 L/s,灵敏度为69.2%,特异性为76.9%。50% FVC时的强迫吸气流量(FIF50)是第二好的预测指标,临界值为2.91 L/s,敏感性为63.7%,特异性为69.2%。结论pif与吸入量相关性强,表明肺量测定法在COPD评价中的重要性。确定的PIF和FIF50临界值有助于临床医生选择合适的吸入器。肺活量测定法为In-Check Dial G16®提供了一种更方便、更省时的替代方法,需要进一步的研究来验证这些发现,并将肺活量测定法的评估整合到COPD管理中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Respiratory medicine
Respiratory medicine 医学-呼吸系统
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
199
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: Respiratory Medicine is an internationally-renowned journal devoted to the rapid publication of clinically-relevant respiratory medicine research. It combines cutting-edge original research with state-of-the-art reviews dealing with all aspects of respiratory diseases and therapeutic interventions. Topics include adult and paediatric medicine, epidemiology, immunology and cell biology, physiology, occupational disorders, and the role of allergens and pollutants. Respiratory Medicine is increasingly the journal of choice for publication of phased trial work, commenting on effectiveness, dosage and methods of action.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信