{"title":"When arable land is the limit: Paths for future livestock production – An example from Norway","authors":"Hanne Fjerdingby Olsen , Stine Samsonstuen , Lisbeth Mogensen , Elin Röös , Marie Trydeman Knudsen , Hanne Møller","doi":"10.1016/j.agsy.2025.104446","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Context</h3><div>The global food system contributes significantly to environmental degradation, with livestock production driving greenhouse gas emissions and feed-food competition. Norway, with only 3.5 % arable land, faces challenges balancing food security with reducing environmental impacts.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>This study examines future livestock production strategies in Norway to evaluate their environmental sustainability and resource efficiency. The focus is on three scenarios for 2040: <em>TrendProd</em> (baseline projection), <em>MoreProd</em> (increased productivity with circular bioeconomy initiatives), and <em>ChangeProd</em> (circular livestock production prioritizing food production over feed use).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Life cycle assessment was used to assess environmental impacts per kg of protein, complemented by resource efficiency evaluations through land use ratio (LUR) and nitrogen recycling index (NRI). Scenarios were analyzed at the national scale for their ability to supply animal-source foods (ASF) while reducing feed-food competition and enhancing biodiversity.</div></div><div><h3>Results and conclusions</h3><div><em>TrendProd</em> reflected current trends, resulting in significant overproduction of animal protein relative to population needs based on dietary recommendations, along with high environmental impacts. <em>MoreProd</em> achieved slightly lower climate impact per kg protein, reduced biodiversity loss, and neutral land use efficiency but increased overall land use. <em>ChangeProd</em> prioritized low-opportunity-cost biomass, enhancing biodiversity and resource efficiency while reducing total production. This would necessitate dietary shifts to maintain domestic production sufficiency. A combination of efficiency and sufficiency strategies, supported by comprehensive policies, is essential for sustainable livestock production.</div></div><div><h3>Significance</h3><div>The findings highlight the potential for Norway to develop sustainable livestock systems that address environmental challenges while maintaining food security. The <em>ChangeProd</em> scenario provides a model for balancing food production with sustainability goals, offering insights for other countries facing similar challenges.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7730,"journal":{"name":"Agricultural Systems","volume":"229 ","pages":"Article 104446"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agricultural Systems","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308521X25001866","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Context
The global food system contributes significantly to environmental degradation, with livestock production driving greenhouse gas emissions and feed-food competition. Norway, with only 3.5 % arable land, faces challenges balancing food security with reducing environmental impacts.
Objective
This study examines future livestock production strategies in Norway to evaluate their environmental sustainability and resource efficiency. The focus is on three scenarios for 2040: TrendProd (baseline projection), MoreProd (increased productivity with circular bioeconomy initiatives), and ChangeProd (circular livestock production prioritizing food production over feed use).
Methods
Life cycle assessment was used to assess environmental impacts per kg of protein, complemented by resource efficiency evaluations through land use ratio (LUR) and nitrogen recycling index (NRI). Scenarios were analyzed at the national scale for their ability to supply animal-source foods (ASF) while reducing feed-food competition and enhancing biodiversity.
Results and conclusions
TrendProd reflected current trends, resulting in significant overproduction of animal protein relative to population needs based on dietary recommendations, along with high environmental impacts. MoreProd achieved slightly lower climate impact per kg protein, reduced biodiversity loss, and neutral land use efficiency but increased overall land use. ChangeProd prioritized low-opportunity-cost biomass, enhancing biodiversity and resource efficiency while reducing total production. This would necessitate dietary shifts to maintain domestic production sufficiency. A combination of efficiency and sufficiency strategies, supported by comprehensive policies, is essential for sustainable livestock production.
Significance
The findings highlight the potential for Norway to develop sustainable livestock systems that address environmental challenges while maintaining food security. The ChangeProd scenario provides a model for balancing food production with sustainability goals, offering insights for other countries facing similar challenges.
期刊介绍:
Agricultural Systems is an international journal that deals with interactions - among the components of agricultural systems, among hierarchical levels of agricultural systems, between agricultural and other land use systems, and between agricultural systems and their natural, social and economic environments.
The scope includes the development and application of systems analysis methodologies in the following areas:
Systems approaches in the sustainable intensification of agriculture; pathways for sustainable intensification; crop-livestock integration; farm-level resource allocation; quantification of benefits and trade-offs at farm to landscape levels; integrative, participatory and dynamic modelling approaches for qualitative and quantitative assessments of agricultural systems and decision making;
The interactions between agricultural and non-agricultural landscapes; the multiple services of agricultural systems; food security and the environment;
Global change and adaptation science; transformational adaptations as driven by changes in climate, policy, values and attitudes influencing the design of farming systems;
Development and application of farming systems design tools and methods for impact, scenario and case study analysis; managing the complexities of dynamic agricultural systems; innovation systems and multi stakeholder arrangements that support or promote change and (or) inform policy decisions.