Impact of the rotational speed and counter electrode configuration on the performance of a rotating disc bioelectrochemical reactor (RDBER) operated as microbial electrolysis cell
Zhizhao Xiao , Max Rümenapf , Max Hackbarth , Andrea Hille-Reichel , Harald Horn , Johannes Eberhard Reiner
{"title":"Impact of the rotational speed and counter electrode configuration on the performance of a rotating disc bioelectrochemical reactor (RDBER) operated as microbial electrolysis cell","authors":"Zhizhao Xiao , Max Rümenapf , Max Hackbarth , Andrea Hille-Reichel , Harald Horn , Johannes Eberhard Reiner","doi":"10.1016/j.biteb.2025.102208","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>A 10 L Rotating Disc Bioelectrochemical Reactor (RDBER) was operated as a microbial electrolysis cell (MEC) under different rotational speeds and counter electrode configurations. Increasing the anode's speed from 0.25 to 1 rpm raised the anodic current density from 0.55 ± 0.14 to 1.00 ± 0.07 A m<sup>−2</sup> while increasing hydrogen production rates from 0.05 ± 0.01 to 0.18 ± 0.01 L<sub>H₂</sub> L<sub>R</sub><sup>−1</sup> d<sup>−1</sup>. Higher speeds provided no further benefit. Moving the counter electrodes to the upper reactor half reduced observed hydrogen shuttling. The modified RDBER reached current densities of 1.98 ± 0.11 A m<sup>−2</sup> and 0.99 ± 0.03 L<sub>H₂</sub> L<sub>R</sub><sup>−1</sup> d<sup>−1</sup> hydrogen production. Optical coherence tomography confirmed biofilm morphology changes but no significant increase in biovolume or substratum coverage. Hydrogen recovery remained below 50 %. While the RDBER achieved high volumetric current densities and volumetric hydrogen production rates compared to other MEC pilots, improvements in anodic current density and cathodic hydrogen recovery are required for practical application.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8947,"journal":{"name":"Bioresource Technology Reports","volume":"31 ","pages":"Article 102208"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bioresource Technology Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589014X25001902","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Environmental Science","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
A 10 L Rotating Disc Bioelectrochemical Reactor (RDBER) was operated as a microbial electrolysis cell (MEC) under different rotational speeds and counter electrode configurations. Increasing the anode's speed from 0.25 to 1 rpm raised the anodic current density from 0.55 ± 0.14 to 1.00 ± 0.07 A m−2 while increasing hydrogen production rates from 0.05 ± 0.01 to 0.18 ± 0.01 LH₂ LR−1 d−1. Higher speeds provided no further benefit. Moving the counter electrodes to the upper reactor half reduced observed hydrogen shuttling. The modified RDBER reached current densities of 1.98 ± 0.11 A m−2 and 0.99 ± 0.03 LH₂ LR−1 d−1 hydrogen production. Optical coherence tomography confirmed biofilm morphology changes but no significant increase in biovolume or substratum coverage. Hydrogen recovery remained below 50 %. While the RDBER achieved high volumetric current densities and volumetric hydrogen production rates compared to other MEC pilots, improvements in anodic current density and cathodic hydrogen recovery are required for practical application.