S. Puri, A. Syed, S. Saxena, B. Keshari, B.V. Madhuri, S. Saran
{"title":"Optimising and improving the quality of large joint radiographs: An educational interventional analysis","authors":"S. Puri, A. Syed, S. Saxena, B. Keshari, B.V. Madhuri, S. Saran","doi":"10.1016/j.radi.2025.103085","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Projection radiographs play a crucial role in diagnosing musculoskeletal conditions, particularly in major joints like the knee, shoulder, and pelvis with bilateral hips. However, poor-quality radiographs can result in misdiagnoses, unnecessary repeat imaging, radiation exposure, and treatment delays. This study aimed to evaluate and enhance radiographic adequacy through targeted interventions.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This study analysed 770 radiographs of the knee, shoulder, and pelvis, with 376 (48.83 %) from before the intervention and 394 (51.17 %) afterwards over 18-month period. A predefined adequacy scoring system was used, and radiographs were evaluated for adequacy pre-and post-intervention by a radiology resident in-training and an expert musculoskeletal radiologist with more than 10 years of experience. Interventions included a teaching session for radiographers on patient positioning, collimation, and exposure settings, along with instructional posters in radiography rooms. Adequacy rates and quality-influencing factors were statistically analysed, applying a significance threshold of p < 0.05.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Before the intervention, 64.9 % (244 out of a total of 376) pre-intervention radiographs were classified as adequate, while the remaining 35.1 % were inadequate, primarily due to improper positioning (79.3 %), poor collimation (12.1 %), or a combination of both (8.6 %). Post-intervention, adequacy rates significantly increased to 89.6 % (353 out of a total of 394) (χ<sup>2</sup> = 67.384, p < 0.001). The likelihood of obtaining an adequate radiograph rose substantially in the post-intervention group, with odds 4.66 times greater than in the pre-intervention group. Improvements were most pronounced in the lateral knee, external rotation view of the shoulder and frontal pelvic radiographs.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>This study demonstrates the effectiveness of targeted educational interventions in significantly enhancing radiographic adequacy.</div></div><div><h3>Implications for practice</h3><div>Implementing educational programs for radiographers can lead to improved imaging quality, ultimately enhancing patient care.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47416,"journal":{"name":"Radiography","volume":"31 5","pages":"Article 103085"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiography","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1078817425002299","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction
Projection radiographs play a crucial role in diagnosing musculoskeletal conditions, particularly in major joints like the knee, shoulder, and pelvis with bilateral hips. However, poor-quality radiographs can result in misdiagnoses, unnecessary repeat imaging, radiation exposure, and treatment delays. This study aimed to evaluate and enhance radiographic adequacy through targeted interventions.
Methods
This study analysed 770 radiographs of the knee, shoulder, and pelvis, with 376 (48.83 %) from before the intervention and 394 (51.17 %) afterwards over 18-month period. A predefined adequacy scoring system was used, and radiographs were evaluated for adequacy pre-and post-intervention by a radiology resident in-training and an expert musculoskeletal radiologist with more than 10 years of experience. Interventions included a teaching session for radiographers on patient positioning, collimation, and exposure settings, along with instructional posters in radiography rooms. Adequacy rates and quality-influencing factors were statistically analysed, applying a significance threshold of p < 0.05.
Results
Before the intervention, 64.9 % (244 out of a total of 376) pre-intervention radiographs were classified as adequate, while the remaining 35.1 % were inadequate, primarily due to improper positioning (79.3 %), poor collimation (12.1 %), or a combination of both (8.6 %). Post-intervention, adequacy rates significantly increased to 89.6 % (353 out of a total of 394) (χ2 = 67.384, p < 0.001). The likelihood of obtaining an adequate radiograph rose substantially in the post-intervention group, with odds 4.66 times greater than in the pre-intervention group. Improvements were most pronounced in the lateral knee, external rotation view of the shoulder and frontal pelvic radiographs.
Conclusion
This study demonstrates the effectiveness of targeted educational interventions in significantly enhancing radiographic adequacy.
Implications for practice
Implementing educational programs for radiographers can lead to improved imaging quality, ultimately enhancing patient care.
RadiographyRADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
34.60%
发文量
169
审稿时长
63 days
期刊介绍:
Radiography is an International, English language, peer-reviewed journal of diagnostic imaging and radiation therapy. Radiography is the official professional journal of the College of Radiographers and is published quarterly. Radiography aims to publish the highest quality material, both clinical and scientific, on all aspects of diagnostic imaging and radiation therapy and oncology.