Exploring suicidal behaviour through implicit identity and control biases: Findings from the Death-Implicit Association Test and its novel control-adaptation
Lara Marie Aschenbrenner , Adriana Frei , Thomas Forkmann , Dajana Schreiber , Heide Glaesmer , Juliane Brüdern , Maria Stein , Marie-Anna Sedlinská , Kristina Adorjan , Sebastian Walther , Anja Gysin-Maillart
{"title":"Exploring suicidal behaviour through implicit identity and control biases: Findings from the Death-Implicit Association Test and its novel control-adaptation","authors":"Lara Marie Aschenbrenner , Adriana Frei , Thomas Forkmann , Dajana Schreiber , Heide Glaesmer , Juliane Brüdern , Maria Stein , Marie-Anna Sedlinská , Kristina Adorjan , Sebastian Walther , Anja Gysin-Maillart","doi":"10.1016/j.comppsych.2025.152621","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>This study examined two <em>Death-Implicit Association Test</em> versions targeting associations between the self-concept (standard identity D-IAT; iD-IAT) and internal versus external control (adapted control D-IAT; cD-IAT) and death among suicide attempters. Additionally, correlations with explicit psychological variables and psychometrics were explored.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>116 psychiatric inpatients (58.1 % female; age <em>M</em> = 33.6, <em>SD</em> = 12.4) were classified as single versus multiple and recent versus lifetime suicide attempters. Implicit associations were measured using the iD-IAT and cD-IAT. Self-report measures included constructs relevant to suicidal behaviour.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Recent attempters showed weaker self-life (<em>t</em>(114) = 2.18, <em>p</em> = .016) and internal control-life (<em>t</em>(114) = 2.26, <em>p</em> = .013) associations than lifetime attempters. Multiple attempters exhibited weaker internal control-life associations than single attempters (<em>t</em>(114) = 2.25, <em>p</em> = .007). The iD-IAT correlated with suicidal ideation (<em>r</em><sub>s</sub>(114) = 0.20, <em>p</em> = .032), depression (<em>r</em><sub>s</sub>(114) = 0.20, <em>p</em> = .033) and external control (<em>r</em><sub>s</sub>(114) = 0.21, <em>p</em> = .021), the cD-IAT with suicidal ideation (<em>r</em><sub>s</sub>(114) = 0.25, <em>p</em> = .006) and depression (<em>r</em><sub>s</sub>(114) = 0.26, <em>p</em> = .006). The cD-IAT predicted multiple attempts (χ<sup>2</sup>(1116) = 3.88, <em>p</em> = .049), showed higher internal consistency (<em>r</em><sub>sb</sub> =. 31, <em>p</em> = .001) and predictive validity in detecting multiple (AUC = 0.64; <em>p</em> = .013) and recent (AUC = 0.62; <em>p</em> = .028) attempters than the iD-IAT.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The cD-IAT shows preliminary potential to differentiate suicidal behaviour based on recency and frequency, offering a tentative step toward understanding cognitive vulnerabilities of at-risk subgroups, warranting further refinement, validation and prospective analyses.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10554,"journal":{"name":"Comprehensive psychiatry","volume":"142 ","pages":"Article 152621"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Comprehensive psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0010440X25000495","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective
This study examined two Death-Implicit Association Test versions targeting associations between the self-concept (standard identity D-IAT; iD-IAT) and internal versus external control (adapted control D-IAT; cD-IAT) and death among suicide attempters. Additionally, correlations with explicit psychological variables and psychometrics were explored.
Method
116 psychiatric inpatients (58.1 % female; age M = 33.6, SD = 12.4) were classified as single versus multiple and recent versus lifetime suicide attempters. Implicit associations were measured using the iD-IAT and cD-IAT. Self-report measures included constructs relevant to suicidal behaviour.
Results
Recent attempters showed weaker self-life (t(114) = 2.18, p = .016) and internal control-life (t(114) = 2.26, p = .013) associations than lifetime attempters. Multiple attempters exhibited weaker internal control-life associations than single attempters (t(114) = 2.25, p = .007). The iD-IAT correlated with suicidal ideation (rs(114) = 0.20, p = .032), depression (rs(114) = 0.20, p = .033) and external control (rs(114) = 0.21, p = .021), the cD-IAT with suicidal ideation (rs(114) = 0.25, p = .006) and depression (rs(114) = 0.26, p = .006). The cD-IAT predicted multiple attempts (χ2(1116) = 3.88, p = .049), showed higher internal consistency (rsb =. 31, p = .001) and predictive validity in detecting multiple (AUC = 0.64; p = .013) and recent (AUC = 0.62; p = .028) attempters than the iD-IAT.
Conclusions
The cD-IAT shows preliminary potential to differentiate suicidal behaviour based on recency and frequency, offering a tentative step toward understanding cognitive vulnerabilities of at-risk subgroups, warranting further refinement, validation and prospective analyses.
期刊介绍:
"Comprehensive Psychiatry" is an open access, peer-reviewed journal dedicated to the field of psychiatry and mental health. Its primary mission is to share the latest advancements in knowledge to enhance patient care and deepen the understanding of mental illnesses. The journal is supported by a diverse team of international editors and peer reviewers, ensuring the publication of high-quality research with a strong focus on clinical relevance and the implications for psychopathology.
"Comprehensive Psychiatry" encourages authors to present their research in an accessible manner, facilitating engagement with clinicians, policymakers, and the broader public. By embracing an open access policy, the journal aims to maximize the global impact of its content, making it readily available to a wide audience and fostering scientific collaboration and public awareness beyond the traditional academic community. This approach is designed to promote a more inclusive and informed dialogue on mental health, contributing to the overall progress in the field.