Modelling 18650-type lithium-ion battery fires using surrogate fuels

IF 3.3 3区 工程技术 Q2 ENGINEERING, CIVIL
Hosein Sadeghi , Francesco Restuccia
{"title":"Modelling 18650-type lithium-ion battery fires using surrogate fuels","authors":"Hosein Sadeghi ,&nbsp;Francesco Restuccia","doi":"10.1016/j.firesaf.2025.104464","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study proposes a simplified combustion modelling approach for 18650-type lithium-ion battery fires in thermal runaway by using surrogate fuels instead of the complex fuel mixture of the vent gases. Twelve different fuels were compared through 1-D premixed and counterflow diffusion flame simulations to identify the most suitable surrogate fuel for batteries with LCO, LFP, and NMC cathodes. The investigation focused on batteries at 100% state of charge (SOC), which pose a higher risk of thermal runaway and greater subsequent hazards compared to lower SOCs. For 1-D flames, CH<span><math><msub><mrow></mrow><mrow><mn>4</mn></mrow></msub></math></span>/CO<span><math><msub><mrow></mrow><mrow><mn>2</mn></mrow></msub></math></span>/CO showed the best performance for all the battery chemistries studied. The battery flame was further validated with 3-D simulations and it was shown that the use of surrogate fuel significantly reduced CPU time by at least 55% compared to the two-step kinetic modelling of the vent gas, which is the common approach used in the literature. This efficiency was achieved while maintaining acceptable levels of accuracy, with maximum errors of 12.2% and 9.5% in flame scalar fields and radiative heat flux, respectively. These findings demonstrate that this approach holds promise for improving computational efficiency in CFD simulations of lithium-ion battery fires in thermal runaway, potentially enhancing the prediction of such events.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50445,"journal":{"name":"Fire Safety Journal","volume":"156 ","pages":"Article 104464"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fire Safety Journal","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0379711225001286","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study proposes a simplified combustion modelling approach for 18650-type lithium-ion battery fires in thermal runaway by using surrogate fuels instead of the complex fuel mixture of the vent gases. Twelve different fuels were compared through 1-D premixed and counterflow diffusion flame simulations to identify the most suitable surrogate fuel for batteries with LCO, LFP, and NMC cathodes. The investigation focused on batteries at 100% state of charge (SOC), which pose a higher risk of thermal runaway and greater subsequent hazards compared to lower SOCs. For 1-D flames, CH4/CO2/CO showed the best performance for all the battery chemistries studied. The battery flame was further validated with 3-D simulations and it was shown that the use of surrogate fuel significantly reduced CPU time by at least 55% compared to the two-step kinetic modelling of the vent gas, which is the common approach used in the literature. This efficiency was achieved while maintaining acceptable levels of accuracy, with maximum errors of 12.2% and 9.5% in flame scalar fields and radiative heat flux, respectively. These findings demonstrate that this approach holds promise for improving computational efficiency in CFD simulations of lithium-ion battery fires in thermal runaway, potentially enhancing the prediction of such events.
使用替代燃料模拟18650型锂离子电池火灾
本研究提出了一种简化的18650型锂离子电池热失控火灾的燃烧建模方法,使用替代燃料代替排气的复杂燃料混合物。通过一维预混和逆流扩散火焰模拟,比较了12种不同的燃料,以确定最适合LCO、LFP和NMC阴极电池的替代燃料。此次调查的重点是100%充电状态(SOC)的电池,与低SOC相比,这种电池存在更高的热失控风险和更大的后续危害。对于一维火焰,CH4/CO2/CO在所有研究的电池化学物质中表现出最好的性能。通过3d模拟进一步验证了电池火焰,结果表明,与文献中常用的两步排气动力学建模方法相比,使用替代燃料可显着减少至少55%的CPU时间。在保持可接受的精度水平的同时实现了这种效率,火焰标量场和辐射热通量的最大误差分别为12.2%和9.5%。这些发现表明,这种方法有望提高热失控锂离子电池火灾CFD模拟的计算效率,并有可能增强此类事件的预测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Fire Safety Journal
Fire Safety Journal 工程技术-材料科学:综合
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
9.70%
发文量
153
审稿时长
60 days
期刊介绍: Fire Safety Journal is the leading publication dealing with all aspects of fire safety engineering. Its scope is purposefully wide, as it is deemed important to encourage papers from all sources within this multidisciplinary subject, thus providing a forum for its further development as a distinct engineering discipline. This is an essential step towards gaining a status equal to that enjoyed by the other engineering disciplines.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信